Many people view college athletics as a pastime, not a profession, and paying athletes would make these sports seem like a profession, not just a representation of the school (Sobocinski 289). The NCAA, and others who oppose compensation, believe in amateurism, the idea that college students should focus on academics first and athletics second (Amateurism 1). Also, they think student athletes are already receiving fair compensation for their work. College athletes receive full scholarships that cover tuition, fees, and books (How 1). Furthermore, these scholarships are granted for at least one year, in case a student suffers a sports injury, the student does not play as well as expected, or the coaching staff is changed (How 1). Some people argue that full athletic scholarships are enough ...
Throughout the long history of college sports, football in particular, athletes have played squarely off of scholarships or as walk-ons. The NCAA generates millions without paying the athletes a dime. Recent years have caused huge problems in the country with paying athletes for playing. Scandal after scandal has rocked the image of college football and doesn’t appear to be getting better. The NCAA prohibits student-athletes from receiving improper benefits and selling memorabilia for a profit when they should be paying its athletes.
In recent years, the argument about whether or not to pay athletes playing at the college level has become a matter of national debate. Currently, the ruling is that college athletes cannot be paid. This is a stance that should be maintained. Paying athletes to compete at the collegiate level is unfeasible because it would cost colleges too much, influence student’s educational decisions and create an unfair financial atmosphere between athletes and non-athletes.
There are many aspects to an NCAA players eligibility, most of them are disputed against. One of these topics is players getting paid. Numerous questions are raised by this topic. The largest of these questions is “Should NCAA players get paid?.” Surprisingly, the pros for paying the athletes outnumber the reasons for not paying them. The athletes are basically workers for their school, they devote hours to their sport, they take time out of their classes, thus making their scholarships less valuable, and the NCAA teams would be more successful.
First, some people think the college athletes should get salary paid by the college affiliates because they make enormous amounts of money. These people are mistaken sorely. The NCAA r other college affiliates actually put a great amount of money into the student football athletes. Things such as scholarships, financial living assistance and financial benefits from the NCAA all come out of them money they bring in each year. Salary would just replace the working system that is already in place for the college football players. Second, some people think that if college athletes receive gifts from the NCAA and/or gifts from other people in the form of money they should be paid salary instead. If the NCAA gives college football ot college athletes in general salary they are actually committing a crime. Accoring to the NCAA, “Pursuant to NCAA Bylaw 15.01.6.2, member institutions and conferences shall not use monies received from the fund for the following. Salaries and benefits...”(NCAA, 1). This is saying that anyone who receives money from the NCAA or anyone else and uses it for a salary is a punishable crime. If the players receive salary then, rules would have to be changed enormously because of the huge restrictions of receiving money for playing and for salary. The gifts that the NCAA give are not salary they are the equivalent to a bonus a few hundred dollars for reaching a high achievement. Lastly, some people think that the college players risk their lives every game. According to the NCAA, “The NCAA provides all student-athletes at all active member institutions coverage under the catastrophic program, and the NCAA pays 100 percent of the current $13.5 million premium. This program provides $20 million in
This has led many athletes to take things into their own hands such as the athletes at Northwestern University who have decided to create the first union in college sports history. Consequently to me this proves that the NCAA has failed as an organization. Thus, I have come to the conclusion that the NCAA should pay college athletes and they should also provide better benefits such as insurance policies because college athletes are left to suffer when they are injured, for many college athletes school work usually comes second when compared to sports, the competition in college sports is already unbalanced, and it would be best for the organization to keep its athletes in good spirits.
There are many different reasons why college athletes should be paid. I think that they should be paid for what they do because they work really hard and they are risking getting serious injuries from playing
One major topic of controversy in today’s society is whether or not the NCAA should allow college athletes to get paid. As of right now, the closest thing to payment athletes can receive for playing sports is an athletic scholarship. Although some people believe that an athletic scholarship is enough compensation for college athletes, the NCAA should start allowing colleges to pay athletes for playing sports at their school because it would help control the salaries of college coaches, athletics are a major source of revenue for schools, and it could help keep athletes on the right track.
For several years many have determined whether or not college athletes should be paid. There are two sides of the equation and a lot of supportive evidence to support both arguments. My personal opinion is that college athletes should be paid. College athletes should be paid by the NCAA because some of them need extra money to pay off college expenses and injuries, academics, and training and hard work.
The NCAA and other organizations will even put a college player’s name on a jersey, hat or other sportswear and never send money to the player. Student athletes should be not only be able to receive a percentage of revenue generated on their account, but also be able to pursue business deals and endorsement opportunities. Many college athletes are kept back from pursuing these types of deals by their school, and the NCAA, even though there’s nothing in regulations that should bar it. College athletes deserve financial recognition for the merchandise profit they generate, as well as the opportunity to pursue their own financial gains.
In summary college athletes should be paid because they are too busy to have a job, the NCAA has enough money and they can put in salary caps so everybody get paid
Imagine working for a billion dollar business, working more than 40 hours a week to complete the job asked of you. Imagine that while having to do your duties for this job, that you are also asked to be a full-time student and put under restrictions to be allowed to keep your status of employment for this same organization. That is the current plight of an NCAA student athlete. They are asked all of this by the NCAA, all while not being allowed to enjoy any of the rewards brought in from their expertise in the sport they compete in. There is no other organization that could get away with this kind of situation, and the NCAA should not be the outlier.
Pay or no Pay for College Athletes The debate on whether college- athletes should be paid or not has formed the main agenda in discourse that relate to college games. There is a growing call among many stakeholders for the introduction of a compensation program that would remunerate college athletes who participate in various sporting activities. There are numerous credible arguments as to why college athletes should be paid, but a majority of such arguments fail due to the reason that the fundamental duty of the university is not to entertain but to educate. Proponents for payment of college athlete bases their argument on the ground that because announcers and coaches are paid, athletes should also be paid.
The argument for not paying athletes is simple and easy to understand. If athletes are getting paid it is unfair for the students that are not athletes. They put up with different struggles that could be potentially harder for them as opposed to the student athletes. Another argument, which is the argument of the NCAA, is athletes in college still fall under the umbrella of “amateurism”. This is because they are in a “self bettering” league that students are participating in voluntary, therefore they should not be
The reason why the NCAA takes advantage of college athletes is because sports tend to make the most money in college , according to t a financial statement by the NCAA on Aug 31, 2017, the NCAA announced $1.045 billion in total income. The NCAA itself declared that it’s a billion dollar per year corporation. Meanwhile college athletes struggle by having to deal with School and keeping their degree also while conserving their sport. Leaving the athletes with little to nun options on how to make money.