There are many aspects to an NCAA players eligibility, most of them are disputed against. One of these topics is players getting paid. Numerous questions are raised by this topic. The largest of these questions is “Should NCAA players get paid?.” Surprisingly, the pros for paying the athletes outnumber the reasons for not paying them. The athletes are basically workers for their school, they devote hours to their sport, they take time out of their classes, thus making their scholarships less valuable, and the NCAA teams would be more successful. Student athletes deserve a payroll because of the vast amount of money they earn for their school. Schools like Texas, Alabama, and Oklahoma all make over $150 million dollars a year. The players should get a small amount of the profit added to their scholarships. It’s only fair that the players make some of that money. This is also one of the big reasons players are upset at the NCAA. They feel as though they should get paid for their efforts. …show more content…
They work day in and day out to win for their schools. This subsequently earns their schools money. And yet the players have nothing to show for it. Also, most of the players that won’t make it pro will have worked all of their lives and not have a dime to show for it. They should get rewarded for their hard work. Also, the players who will go professional after their college careers just view college as one year for them to get hurt and lose their draft stock. Paying the players could possibly get players to stay one or two years longer in an attempt to make more money going pro. This would cause a ripple effect that would make the schools, leagues, and the NCAA to make
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote regards a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid for playing for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Should college athletes receive pay for what they do? You’ve probably seen this pop-up a million times, and thought about it. You’ve probably figured why should they? Aren’t they already receiving benefits from a full-ride scholarship? But then an athlete will get caught up in a scandal like Johnny Manziel, where he signed footballs for money.. then you think well why shouldn’t he receive that money? And you then contradict yourself. But shouldn’t they receive money from outside sources, and then the benefits from the school. Not get a salary from the school just the benefits they’re already receiving, and money from sponsors. Wouldn’t that make sense considering the money they’re making the school? According to an ESPN report Alabama University makes $123,769,841 in total revenue from sports. (College Athletics Revenue) Yes ONE HUNDRED & TWENTY THREE MILLION. Yet an athlete from Alabama can only receive benefits from a scholarship.. That doesn’t seem right. You would want to be payed when the opportunity arises. It should only be fair these players get a piece of the revenue pie, after all they are the ones creating the revenue. The players should be getting benefits to allow them to pay for basic college needs, grow up to be responsible adults, and allow the NCAA to thrive. This would allow for the NCAA to truly thrive as a sporting association.
College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.
Many problems exist in college sports today. One of the major problems in college athletics today is the issue of athletes receiving impermissible benefits from colleges and their boosters. It seems as if players and universities are constantly under NCAA investigation for impermissible benefits. College athletics today and the perceptions of them are changing. Some people are just plain sick of the NCAA and their old-fashioned rules. There are many different opinions of what the NCAA should do regarding payment for players. Currently, all the NCAA is doing is nothing. Most people believe that rules need to be changed and updated, however varying opinions exist on what changes should be made. Many assume the only solution is to allow players to be paid by colleges. Contrary to popular belief, allowing colleges to pay athletes will not solve the problem of impermissible benefits; it will create other big problems People will break those rules no matter what, and there is no way to ensure fairness. Therefore, the NCAA needs to change its rules to allow stipends for college athletes but not payments.
College sports have grown over the years, earning billions of revenue every year. However, what may seem surprising is that the athletes involved do not get a single penny earned from the revenue. These college sports require tremendous time and determination due to long hard practices along with rigorous course works. And due to the lack of time, athletes don’t often have the time for part time jobs that allow them to earn money to buy things they need or want for their personal life. Therefore, college athletes have every right to be paid for their hard work.
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
Today there are over 450,000 college athletes and the National College Athletics Association (NCAA) faces a difficult decision on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many people believe that they should and many believe they should not. There are several benefits that college’s athletes receive for being a student athlete. Why should they receive even more benefits than their scholarship and numerous perks?
Should college athletes get paid an additional salary? They are an important assets to universities and colleges, so why should they not? How else would universities justify taking advantage of these young men and women? These are questions that arise when pondering the issue. This has been a large controversy over the years of rather or not college athletes should be paid, more specifically football and basketball players. However, they fail to mention that colleges are only considering paying a select few, the stars of the sports. Every single sport in colleges is making revenue for those campuses, making colleges money hungry. Thus, if they decide to only pay a select few, would that leave out women sports all together? Why pay college athletes more on top of everything they already receive? Most college athletes receive free tuition, medical care, meal plans and room and board, which can acquaint to more than a quarter million dollars for their entire college career (Scoop, 2013). Why ask for more? What is this teaching our youth? They should appreciate their chance to do what they love and value the education they are receiving, because that education is far more valuable than a potential sports salary. Even though colleges and college athletes have a few good points on why they believe they should get paid, over all the issue is larger than that, college athletes already make their share of “money” through free education and much more.
Recently the NCAA has been under a lot of pressure over the issue of paying college athletes in return for the extreme amount of revenue and wealth brought to the university by being successful on national television. The dispute has brought up issues on both sides of the controversy as to what should happen with the millions of dollars student athletes generate through the highly publicized and money making games and tournaments in college sports. The major money making sports in college athletics are undoubtedly football and men’s basketball. These two sports combined have year round ESPN and national television coverage which creates multi-billion dollar revenues that the schools rake in. So the question remains, why should high profile student athletes not be paid for their accomplishments on the field or court? There is a strict line between an amateur and a pro which
...it off of their likeness. No we should not be paid millions of dollars, or even hundreds of thousands, but I do believe that student-athletes should receive a small amount of money .It is only fair to the student-athletes because they are the ones out there putting in work on the field, weight room, film room, and traveling half the time to represent the university on top of trying to maintain a grade point average. I feel that it does not only deserve, but I also believe that getting a stipend would help student-athletes learn to manage their money. There is a reason so many athletes that make it to the professional level end up broke. It’s not fair to the players that they cannot make a profit off of their god given talents and their likeness. In a certain aspect college athletics is sort of like slavery, the university controls almost every aspect of your life.
College sports attract thousands of fans to games every weekend. This used to just be the people who bought tickets to view the game from the stadium. Recently, the amount of fans that can view games has dramatically increased due to television deals that allow games to be broadcasted all over the nation. These deals generate lots of revenue for the NCAA and its members. In 2012, the NCAA generated $797,598,000 of revenue. Television and marketing rights made up 90% of that amount and that doesn’t include the money that individual universities made from ticket and apparel sales. With all of the money that college sports generate, the question arises, “Should the athletes be paid?” This question has caused great controversy because of all of the differing views on the subject. Many believe that athletes are already fairly compensated through scholarships and don’t deserve to be paid but there are many others, especially outside of the NCAA, that believe college athletes should be paid in some way.
College athletes have gained a lot of popularity among Americans in the past few decades. This has resulted with an increasing revenues for National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and not just NCAA but the colleges as well. However, one side is not getting any profit, and that side is college athletes. College and basketball programs earn billions of dollars each year through marketing, broadcast contracts, ticket sales and merchandising. The March Madness basketball tournament alone earns more than $1 billion each year in ad revenues, far more than the Superbowl. Schools and the (NCAA) both benefit tremendously from the windfall, as do coaches, many of whom are paid more than a million dollars each year. But the athletes themselves? They do not get a penny. The question becomes, why should they get paid? Reasons for they are; they spent tremendous time on practices, they struggle to earn
The question about if college athletes should be paid has an unknown answer to many. There are two sides, the athletes should get paid and they shouldn’t. College athletes should and deserve to get paid because they bring money to the university when or if they win, with all their hard work and dedication, they already can be paid with scholarships, the NCAA pays for clothing expenses, medical and emergency travel, so why can’t they give some of that money to the athletes.
College athletes should be paid! College athletes are often considered to be some of the luckiest students in the world. Most of them receiving all inclusive scholarships that cover all the costs of their education. They are also in a position to make a reputation for themselves in the sporting world preparing them for the next step. The ongoing debate whether student athletes should be paid has been going on for years. These athletes bring in millions of dollars for their respective schools and receive zero in return. Many will argue that they do receive payment, but in reality it is just not true. Costs associated with getting a college education will be discussed, information pertaining to the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and benefits student athletes receive. First, I’ll start with costs associated with college and most of all why student athletes should be paid!
College athletes should be paid because they are basically working for the school. When a student gets a scholarship to a college for a sport they are expected to practice with the team and without the team, so on their free time. College athletes go way over the maximum amount of hours they are allowed to practice with the team. A 2011 survey, from the article Should College Athletes Be Paid?, states “The NCAA has a limit of 20 hours of training per week, D1 football players on average practice 43 hours a week, baseball 42.1 hours a week, and men’s basketball 39.2 hours a week”(Walch). With