Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Cloning Will Have a Negative Effect Society
The definition of a clone is an organism that has the same genetic information as
another organism or organisms. Scientific and ethical studies of cloning, prove that,
cloning will have a negative rather than a positive effect on society.
The goals and purposes for cloning range from making copies of those who have
died, to bettering the engineering of offspring in humans and animals (Hawley, 1998).
Cloning could also directly offer a means of curing diseases or could offer a technique that
could extend means to acquiring new data for the sciences of embryology and how
organisms develop as a whole over time.
Currently, the agricultural industry demands nuclear transfer to produce better
livestock, and cloning could massively improve the agricultural industry as the technique
of nuclear transfer improves (Hawley, 1998). Nuclear transfer takes the nucleus of a cell
from one individual and places it in the egg or another individual, from which the nucleus
has been removed (Wertz, 1998b). The change in phenotype, the observable physical and
biochemical characteristics of an organism, of livestock is accomplished by bombarding
embryos of livestock with genes that produce "super" livestock traits; however, this
technique is not efficient because only five percent of the offspring express these "super"
traits that would guarntee a more productive industry. Scientists can easily genetically
alter adult cells; therefore, cloning from an adult cell would make it easier to alter the
genetic material. The goal of transgenic livestock1 is to produce livestock with ideal
characteristics for the agricultural industry and to be able to manufacture biological
products such as proteins for humans.
Farmers are attempting to produce transgenic livestock already, but not efficiently,
due to the minimal ability to alter embryos genetically. Researchers can harvest and grow
adult cells in large amounts unlike embryos; scientists can then genetically alter the adult
cells, find which ones transformed, and clone only those cells. Scientists also ponder the
idea of cloning endangered species to increase their population.
The possibilities of cloning are endless, however as suggested by (Hawley, 1998) we are
actually doing much of this research for the improvement of life for humans.
Cloning provides better research capabilities for finding cures to many diseases.
Livestock can produce biological proteins that help people who have diseases including
Diabetes, Parkinson's, and Cystic Fibrosis. There are also possibilities that nuclear
transfer could provide benefits to those who would like to have children. For example,
couples who are infertile, or have genetic disorders, could use cloning to produce a child.
Farrell, Courtney. "Cloning: An Overview. By: Farrell, Courtney, Carson-Dewitt, Rosalyn, Points of View: Cloning, 2013." Ebscohost.com. Mackinvia.com, 2013. Web. 21
As the years pass by, research is continually uncovering new methods to improve efficiency of domestic breeding programs for commercially farmed animals. Within every one of these methods there are advantages, disadvantages, limitations and ethical issues which must be investigated and addressed. Still, with the use of these realised technologies, there have been significant advances already, that indicate a more genetically focused, and technology based farming life for future years. Procedures including Embryo Transfer (ET) and Artificial Insemination (AI) are already being employed, with widespread use on commercial cattle properties. While at the same time, technologies such as Cloning, and Genetic Engineering although seemingly already developed to some degree, are just the tip of the iceburg as researchers strive to create a genetically perfect, nation wide, breeding program for cattle, pigs, sheep, goats and poultry.
Human cloning research has once been the subject of terrifying science-fiction films and novels, science experiments gone wrong, accomplished only by the evil scientists twirling their moustaches. However, ideas presented on page and screen are rarely accurate. The possibility of cloning an exact copy of another human with one already fully developed is almost impossible, but through meticulous research, scientists have discovered the numerous benefits of cloning humans, either with individual cells or an embryo.
Cloning is a procedure of creating genetically indistinguishable organisms through nonsexual means (Devolder 2008). After years of countless research and experimenting, scientists successfully cloned their first mammal using a technique called somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). In Devolder’s paper she states, “Somatic cells are any cells other than the reproductive system cells” (Devolder 2008). Scientists realized they could take fully developed somatic cells from any part of the body and, through the SCNT system, use the cells to make a genetic copy of the cell. This growth in cell research is binding scientists in a race to establish their findings so they could be the first in the finish line. This pressure to be renowned has driven scientists to attempt to control the very natural process of life. Our world is plagued by disease, an increase in population and poverty with limited resources to satisfy the basic needs of mankind, so cloning is often regarded as the solution. Cloning for reproduction and therapy has improved drastically displaying a lot of potential uses but is vastly outweighed with larger risks.
clone is a genetic copy or a replica of an living organism. But, when you gear
techniques in their laboratory to make copies of cells or organisms with a valuable trait.
Cloning (asexual reproduction) is the production of individuals who are genetically identical to an already existing individual. The procedure is called somatic cell nuclear transfer. Scientists take a mature, unfertilized egg and remove its nucleus. Next, they, introduce a nucleus obtained from a specialized (somatic) cell of an adult organism. Once the egg begins to divide, they transfer the embryo into woman's uterus to initiate a pregnancy. Since almost all the hereditary material of a cell is contained within its nucleus, the re-nucleated eggs are genetically identical to the organism that was the source of the transferred nucleus (Kass, 2001). The genetically identical individual is called the clone and could be produced by nuclear transfer. Any person, living or deceased could be cloned, and in any number. Due to the fact that cloning requires no personal involvement on the part of the person whose genetic material is used, cloning could be completed without a person’s consent. This would be a threat to reproductive freedom, according to Kass.
Gene cloning works by first isolating the desired gene and ‘cutting’ it from the original chromosome using restriction enzymes. The piece of DNA is ‘pasted’ into a vector and the ends of the DNA are joined with the vector DNA by ligation. The vector is introduced into a host cell, often a bactera or yeast, by a process called transformation. The host cells copy the vector DNA along with their own DNA, creating multiple copies of the inserted DNA. The vector DNA is separated from the host cells’ DNA and purified. Gene cloning is used to create a large number of copies of a gene. The cloned DNA can be used to decipher the function of the gene, Investigate a gene’s characteristics like size, or expression, look at how mutations may affect a gene’s function or make large concentrations of the protein coded for by the gene.
Automatically when people talk about human cloning that tend to be negative. Most reaction is people shouldn't play god or interfere with nature. Of course there are negative consequences that could come from cloning. On the other hand there is so many positive things that could save more lives than it would cost. Yes Cloning involves risky techniques that could result in premature babies and some deaths. That is why public policy needs to be changed on cloning. The medical possibilities are endless if federal money is given to research and develop cloning techniques.
In the world today, issues such as Global Warming and the War in Iraq take the front cover on any newspaper, but in the world tomorrow, the concept of cloning will become an ever-more pressing issue. How do you define the term cloning? Well, in the words of Jac...
Spearmann thought of cloning as a way to study cell differentiation. Briggs and King used the technique of nuclear transfer on amphibians and it was successful (Campbell). “Subsequently John Gurdon demonstrated the potential to reprogram differentiated cells by producing adult Xenopus using epithelial cells from developing tadpole intestine as nuclear donors,” says Alberio Campbell. Unfortunately, later studies show that this method of cloning tadpoles didn’t allow them to develop to the adult stage of life (Campbell). “The use of enucleated metaphase II oocytes as recipient cytoplasts proved more successful and in 1986 resulted in the production of live lambs using blastomeres from 8 to 16-cell stage embryos as nuclear donors,” says Campbell. This success in sheep was also used on other mammals such as cattle and swine. There were limitations to the technology. First, the “frequency development was very low”...
It allows researchers and scientists to continue to conduct in-depth research, which could lead to vast advancements in cloning methods. Works Cited Brake, Elizabeth. The "Parenthood and Procreation" Stanford University. Stanford University, 2012 -. Web.
Perhaps cloning is not the answer and our society should leave reproduction up to the natural ways. But then one must ask themselves the question of 'why not'. Is there some horrible outcome that will back fire due to the aberrant ways of creating a child? Is bring...
Imagine yourself in a society in which individuals with virtually incurable diseases could gain the essential organs and tissues that perfectly match those that are defected through the use of individual human reproductive cloning. In a perfect world, this could be seen as an ideal and effective solution to curing stifling biomedical diseases and a scarcity of available organs for donation. However, this approach in itself contains many bioethical flaws and even broader social implications of how we could potentially view human clones and integrate them into society. Throughout the focus of this paper, I will argue that the implementation of human reproductive cloning into healthcare practices would produce adverse effects upon family dynamic and society due to its negative ethical ramifications. Perhaps the most significant conception of family stems from a religious conception of assisted reproductive technologies and cloning and their impact on family dynamics with regard to its “unnatural” approach to procreation. Furthermore, the broader question of the ethical repercussions of human reproductive cloning calls to mind interesting ways in which we could potentially perceive and define individualism, what it means to be human and the right to reproduction, equality and self-creation in relation to our perception of family.
d for nuclear verses cytoplasmic factors. * Commercial Endeavours: Noting that no live dog clones have yet been reported, the company PerPETuate, Inc. (Connecticut) is freezing tissue from family pets for the future. Researchers have had little success in the steps required to make a dog clone, such as development after nuclear transfer and embryo implantation into the womb. * Treatment for Human Disease: Cells could be harvested from early embryos to provide cell and tissue replacement without the hazards of transplantation rejection.