Client Assessment

696 Words2 Pages

On 9/172015, CM did a visual to locate the client. The client was located and CM completed Bi-Weekly ILP Review. The client was not seeing by this worker on 9/15.2016, because this worker was absent. In the meeting the client was dressed in a black long floral dress. She was well groomed. Client has a high stomach. CM is concern that the client might be pregnant. CM referred the client numerous times to the onsite medical staff and urine test was done with negative pregnancy. CM also inquires if the client is sexually active. Client reports “she is not sexually active. She mentioned her high stomach is due to fibroids”. CM also provided the client with two metro cards on 9/11/2015, to go to Woodhull Emergency Room because client stated she …show more content…

She has a mandated visitation with her son every Monday and Wednesday. Client sometimes is not complaint with ACS visitations, Court Hearing and Judge Recommendation. CM mentioned and gave client Bilingual Parenting Classes beginning 9/22/2015. CM advises the client to contact Edwing Gould Case Planner Ms. Caryn McCarthy and Ms. Gomez/Legal Aide.

Client is non complaint with the shelter rule and regulation. She has numerous Infractions from Security stating that the client does not vacate the dorm at 9am. CM addresses this issue with the client numerous times but client doesn’t grasp the information. CM will reiterate the shelter rule and regulation. Client must comply with curfew and maintained a clean area in her bed area clean. Client must adhere to 10PM Curfew.

CM observation: In the meeting client appeared her stated. She was cooperative and appropriate in the meeting. She sometimes made eye contact. She appears to have the intellectual cognitive and functioning disorder. She doesn't grasp information like everyone else and her conversation is always one side geared towards her son. She continues blamed everyone, including her lawyer, LHMC and Case Planner of doing anything to help her get her son back. Client needs to be re-evaluated for intellectual learning disability. She must seek alternative

Open Document