Consultation Case Study

1406 Words3 Pages

Ethical Consultation, Decision-Making, and Self-Awareness in Clinical Practice The American Psychiatric Association (APA) Code of Ethics (2002) is the foundation for psychology’s professional practice and ethical responsibility. Although it is important to know the ethical standards, professionals must also apply them into practice. The current case example examines the importance of professional consultation, when faced to identify ethical dilemmas in clinical practice, make ethical decisions, and gain insight into self-awareness. This case also highlights the importance of implementing self-care in clinical practice, especially when treating patients who present with severe symptomatology. Ethical Dilemma An ethical dilemma occurs when moral obligations clash, and may pose a challenge when faced to define which course of action is right or wrong. In the current case, Ashley, an advanced doctoral student is faced with a challenging ethical dilemma at her current practicum site. The ethical dilemma became complex and multi-layered, prompting Ashley to seek peer consultation in efforts to make sound and professional decision making when faced to determine the course of action. Specifically, Ashley who is treating two teenage adolescents (patient A, patient B) from the same H.S. is made aware of private information concerning patient B, from patient A. Patient A is considered to be more “high-risk” due to the recent tragic death of her parents, suicide attempts, and chronic suicidal ideation with plan. Ashley fears that the information she holds may trigger patient A into depression and suicidal ideation. In addition, Ashley is conflicted that withholding the information from her patient may do equal damage, and sever their relat... ... middle of paper ... ...s that may contribute to VT: • Personal victimization history that is unresolved. • Lack of experience/novice. • Lack of coping skills, excessive demands from self, others and/or work. • Current personal stress experience. • Low level of subjective personal accomplishments/low fulfillment of goals. • Unrealistic expectations about patient recovery. • Excessive time in the same job. Linehan (1993) states that working with high-risk patients, and/ Axis II symptomatology can cause frustration, disappointment, and other negative reactions in therapists. Linehan (1993) emphasizes the importance to elicit peer supervision and professional consultation for overall support. In addition, the mindfulness of one’s reactions to challenging patients is crucial. Furthermore, it is important to maintain an objective and scientific approach to clinical care (Linehan, 1993).

Open Document