Dual Behavior Summary

1179 Words3 Pages

Throughout the second half of this semester, dual relationships have been emphasized as one of the most frequently encountered ethical dilemmas faced by behavior analysts in the field today. According to the class lectures, assigned text, and other articles that we have read, this is due to the fact that we interact with our clients and those caring for them in their natural settings. As a result, those we provide services to, and interact with, are in the places in which they feel the most comfortable, their homes or regular classrooms. This is in stark contrast to a formal office setting, which projects an atmosphere with both expected standards of acceptable behavior, and clear boundaries between client and the service provider. In an effort …show more content…

Prior to the beginning of the school year, she was assigned to work with two of a retiring analyst’s clients, including an 8 year old girl, named Jody, with ASD who had a history of multiple behavior problems. Jody spent the school day in a special education “resource room” with only 8 other children. Carol worked with Jody in her home, as well as at school. She adhered to all protocol in assessing, analyzing, and developing a behavior plan to address Jody’s problem behavior of throwing pencils when a demand was placed on her to complete schoolwork, and homework. Escape was identified as the function of the behavior, and the differential reinforcement procedure (DRO) was achieving the desired result of reducing the pencil throwing, and increasing the frequency of the replacement behavior of raising her hand instead. Carol was confident that she would be able to markedly reduce or eliminate Jody’s other problem behaviors as well, but it was likely that she would be working with Jody for at least half of the school year to eliminate them …show more content…

At the end of the previous school year, Carol, and her daughter’s teachers noticed that Carol’s daughter was not progressing in her studies, and an evaluation conducted by the child study team revealed that she had a specific learning disability. An IEP meeting was scheduled, and conducted. The determination was made to place Carol’s daughter in the same resource room as Carol’s client Jody, for half of the day. Carol instantly realized that this decision put her in a predicament where a dual relationship would be created. She would then cross a clear boundary, and become a parent of a classmate, as well as the professional she has already established herself as to Jody and her parents. This would undoubtedly lead to instances in which both her client, and the client’s family would be interacting with her at both school functions and on class trips. She knew that allowing this to happen was against the BACB Guidelines for Responsible Conduct for Behavior Analysts. Carol voiced her opposition and explained the ethical quandary to those attending the IEP meeting, and what would occur if her daughter was placed in the same room with her client. Carol stated that she would speak with her supervisor, but it was probable that he would determine that she would not be able to continue working with Jody. Carol felt that having to become accustomed to another behavior analyst

Open Document