China Today

1244 Words3 Pages

The path of economic development can take many alternate routes and contain frequent detours, however, as each nation develops they must confront the root causes of their poverty and past failures. Economist Daron Acemoglu of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology argues that inclusive political and economic institutions aggregate to form an argument based in historical antecedents of countries throughout the world. Moreover, University of Stanford economist Barry Weingast’s argument relies on the idea of a strong, but never too strong federalist system acting as a catalyst for economic success. While both authors contain numerous historical examples, neither set a precedent that is fully applicable to the current state of affairs economically nor politically in the People’s Republic of China. In order to understand the failings in Weingast’s argument, it is essential to examine his findings and how they compare to Acemoglu’s findings. Weingast examines the role of decentralization in the federalist system and how political foundations of markets are crucial to the process of economic development. “China has more than 900,000 laws and regulations in addition to hundreds of thousands of judicial decisions. Many Chinese citizens are aware of laws and policies and think government should take them more seriously” (Diamant). The idea that a nation must make a credible commitment to the preservation of markets relies on limiting the power of the political officials through self-enforcing mechanisms, however it is apparent when you talk to many Chinese nationals or read any non-state run media that rampant corruption is one of the pressing issues of modern China (Weingast 2). This phenomenon has arisen from the Chinese inst... ... middle of paper ... ...nist Party officials room to breathe before making the critical decision of choosing between “what is good for China and what is good for the CCP?” and whichever path they choose it will impact the economic well-being of the entire world (Branstetter 2013). China’s old economic model, which rewarded both the country and the elite very handsomely, must now be transformed into a model that will continue to reward the country, but at the relative expense of the elite. Recent political turmoil in China is not a coincidence, and it has not ended. History has made it very clear that the next ten years will be a political challenge for China even more so than it will be an economic one. As the 3rd Plenary Session of the 18th CCP concluded more than a week ago, we are left to speculate whether the suggested reforms will be the panacea for any of China’s political ills.

Open Document