Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on Alexander the great
An essay on Alexander the great
An essay on Alexander the great
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on Alexander the great
Alexander II was the oldest son of his father Emperor Nicholas I. Alexander II was born in Moscow, Russia on April 29, 1818 and died on March 13, 1881. From a young age, Alexander was being prepared for when he becomes emperor. Alexander had a private teacher by the name of Vasili Zhukovski, a famous Russian poet. Alexander learned how to speak four new languages other than Russian. Alexander gained a lot of knowledge through a broad and thorough education; he also worked in rigorous military training which permanently damaged his health. At the age of nineteen, was ready to finish school, but he had to do one more thing before that which was to tour Russia and Europe. Alexander went to Siberia, which was in northern Russia, a place that no one part of the royal family has ever been. During his travels Alexander met his future wife, Princess Marie of Hesse, they got married soon after that and had eight children. Throughout his younger days, Alexander had a variety of military and government jobs, unlike his father. During the time Nicholas was absent, Alexander was given the duties of the Russian emperor, or czar.
Alexander II ascended the throne after the death of his father. Alexander got the throne in the middle of the Crimean War, where there was a military conflict for Russia. Soon after, Alexander signed the Treaty of Paris which brought the war to an end. This war made Alexander realize that Russia was no longer a great military power. Some said that Russia’s serf based economy could no longer compete with industrialized nations such as Britain and France. Alexander was debating on whether he should bring an end to serfdom in Russia, or not. Alexander said “It is better to abolish serfdom from above than to ...
... middle of paper ...
... by making them pay more than the lands worth they are still losing valuable land they could use more productively.
The country’s feeling about Alexander II after his reign would be a mix of happiness and sorrow. Some would be happy that they don’t have to deal with Alexander II anymore, while others will be sad that their emperor died. Alexander II could’ve been a better emperor to his citizens if he listened to their advice rather than doing what he desires (Divine Right).
Works Cited
1. http://russiapedia.rt.com/prominent-russians/the-romanov-dynasty/alexander-ii-liberator/
2. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/14059/Alexander-II
3. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/RUSalexander2.htm
4. http://www.dromo.info/alexanderiibio.htm
5. http://www.notablebiographies.com/A-An/Alexander-II.html
6. http://www.alexanderpalace.org/palace/AlexIIbio.html
Borza, Eugene N. "Alexander the Great: History and Cultural Politics." Journal of the Historical Society 7.4 (2007): 411-442. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 17 May 2011.
Alexander began his military campaign and his rule much where his father left off. Whether or not it was his aim, this created a sense of normality for the men that was part of his father’s regime. Alexander’s position as a warrior-king who stood side-by-side among his men also served to create respect among his peers. Gradually, as Alexander conquered more Persian land, he began to adopt the policies of Persian rulers. Alexander’s change in policy extended beyond just political roles, he gave consideration to the local gods in many of the lands that he conquered. Eventually, Alexander brought people in from the conquered nations to serve under him.
This meant that Alexander II would need to somehow release the serfs from their owner’s land. Another reason for emancipation was made clear in a quote from Alexander II in March 1856: “It is better to abolish serfdom from above than to await the time when it will begin to abolish itself from below”. This shows that emancipation was going to be used as a tool to solve two problems facing Alexander II. However, in order for emancipation to succeed another reform had to occur which was land reforms. However, Alexander II did not want the political system of Russia to change whilst the economic transformation was occurring.
People might know Czar Nicholas as the last emperor of Russia. He was born near St. Petersburg in May of 1868, the eldest son of Tsar Alexander III. He married Princess Alexandra of Hesse- Darmstadt (a duchy in Germany). He and his wife had four daughters and one son together. They were all executed by the Bolsheviks in 1918.
After the crippling defeat in the Crimean War, Alexander II knew that Russia could not be allowed to lag behind the Western world any longer if it was to maintain its independence. The reform of the state had been advisable for a long time, but for Alexander III it was necessary. He knew that before any real changes could be achieved, the main problem had to be solved: the problem of serfdom. However many limits and imperfections his edict of Emancipation carried with it, most importantly it allowed for further modernizing reforms in the legal, government, education and military spheres.
Q8. After a hard loss during the Crimean War, the previous Czar Nicholas I position was taken over by his son Alexander II. This brought new change and hope to the people of Russia. Russians were hoping for change at the time, and that is exactly what the driven new Czar had brought to the table. Alexander II came along with the idea of modernization and social change for Russia. In order to do this, Alexander II created his reforms which he thought would be Russia's best interest in order to compete with other nations powers.
Alexander The Great was a very influential person in history. The reason that he is so recognized is because of how much he achieved at a young age. When he was a child, his father, Philip II of Macedon employed Aristotle, the famous philosopher to teach Alexander strategy, math and art as well as chess. By the time he was 20 he was extremely educated and really good at chess. When his Father was assassinated in 336 B.C.E, Alexander took his place in the army and started his conquest of much of the early world. Alexander was great because of his leadership, Integrity and courage.
Even though Alexander III of Macedonia, more commonly known as Alexander the Great, only lived to be 32 years old, his accomplishments were so vast it would be impossible to capture them all in a 3-hour Hollywood film. The well-known director, Oliver Stone, spent years studying Alexander and dreaming of making an epic film about his life. Stone's 2004 film, Alexander, was met with reviews that made it sound as if it was mediocre or disappointing, but the problem with it is that in the era of exciting action-driven Hollywood films, Alexander asks viewers to go deeper than they are accustomed. The length of the film was considered too long, but the history of Alexander is so huge that it is actually too short. Since Alexander lived more than 2300 years ago, and much of the information on Alexander's life has been lost over time, it seems to me that Alexander accurately depicts the historical era, Alexander's relationships, battle scenes and the different cultures involved in Alexander's conquests.
Alexander is the son of King Philip of Macedonia and Queen Olympias. We see Alexander's daily life and the strained relationship between his parents. Alexander grows up with his mother Olympias and his tutor Aristotle, where he finds interest in love, honor, music, exploration, poetry, and military combat. Young Alexander impresses his father by taming an intractable horse, but both mother and son are banished from the kingdom, Olympias advising her son to seize the throne before Philip has him murdered. As things work out, Philip is murdered, and Alexander rules Macedonia. (BBC)
Many small government officials took pieces of land, changing the laws and affecting the citizens in big ways. Ten years later, the empire fell apart, leaving people with many burdens. Alexander left his empire after he died in a big mess, hoping someone could help him. This was unsmart because even though death might not be expected, it is always important to create a will with as much at stake as there was in Alexander’s situation. In summary, Alexander was not smart because he wasn’t able to think ahead to help his empire stay strong.
Alexander the Great (July 356BC – June 323BC) was King of the ancient Greek Kingdom of Macedon. By the age of thirty he had created one of the largest empires of the ancient world. He remained undefeated in battle and is considered one of history’s most successful Military commanders. Historians’ have offered theories which could explain Alexander’s motivation to conquer so much of the known world. Some suggest that Alexander was an idealistic visionary who sought to unite the world, whereas others argued that he was a fascist whose hunger for power drove him. The Ancient Greeks were driven by love of honour (philotimaea) and their desire for greatness. They were competitive, always striving to better one another.
First, Alexander the Great is a villain because he caused the destruction of his own empire. Throughout his reign as king, he was constantly asked to name a successor to take over the empire if something happened to him, but Alexander always refused. Alexander needed to name a successor to keep his empire going, but he “both refused to provide one, and killed off any man who could be seen as one…” (The John Maxwell Company). Alexander was so determined to stay in control of his empire that he killed any man who he thought could be seen as his successor. He cared more about himself and his power than his empire and it’s success. When
Few historical figures stand out in the same degree as that of Alexander the Great. He was a warrior by 16, a commander at age 18, and was crowned King of Macedon by the time he was 20 years old. He did things in his lifetime that others could only dream about. Alexander single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in just over a decade. There were many attributes that made Alexander “Great.” He was a brilliant strategist and an inspired leader; he led by example and was a conqueror at heart. In looking at his early childhood, accession to the throne, conquests, marriage, and death one can see why Alexander the Great is revered in historical contexts as one of the greatest figures of all time.
Alexander II has been considered “a great historical figure without being a great man, that what he did was more important than what he was.” ( W.E Mosse) For 26 years, Czar Alexander II ruled russia. During his reign, he made his mark on history by stepping outside of the box and going to extreme measures to help his people. He has been labeled as the “Liberator of tsar” for the ending of serfdom. Czar Alexander II of Russia has made an impact on history because of his interesting background, fatal assassination, and the changes made after his assassination.
In conclusion, I believe Alexander is one of the best political leader and the best general in the history. He managed to conquer and govern a huge territory with his wisdom. He didn’t win wars with soldiers, he won with strategy. Without a question, he was the most successful leader in the history. He knew how t rule and how to make people obedient and it is the main reason that he was very influential. These qualities made him live forever in stories, epics, and