Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflecrion on peloponnesian war
Reflecrion on peloponnesian war
Reflecrion on peloponnesian war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflecrion on peloponnesian war
I have gone to the future, and I have seen the vast changes that will be made to the world in the next twenty-four centuries. The political nature of the current situation between Athens and Sparta of absolute power and security will be replaced by a more complex system because of technology and globalization. With the knowledge I have learned in the twenty-first century, the war would have a very different outcome. Power will still play a role in politics, but its role is very different.
War between Athens and Sparta under the current system was inevitable, as both were competing for absolute power, or to become hegemons. Because the concern was for absolute gains, the Peloponnesian War was one of limited cooperation. This is demonstrated by the violent incident in Melos. Because the Melians were neutral and not directly on the side of the Athenians, it was in the Athenians’ interest for absolute power gains to outright destroy the Melians. I have learned in the twenty-first century that such a demonstration of power is not always efficient. Instead of using hard power, Athenians could have used soft power like diplomacy, cultural exchanges, and political leadership to gain the Melians trust and support. Instead of being seen as a large power bullying a small power but as a compromiser that would gain other countries’ respect. The use of soft power is also generally much cheaper than using force. Though soft power is less tangible, it is more useful to Athens in the long run. Though Athens is at the brink of losing the Peloponnesian War against Sparta, if it had built up a repository of goodwill through its use of soft power, it would still have a lasting and important influence in world affairs.
A benefit that the twenty-first ...
... middle of paper ...
... than a small one. When the peacekeeping presence is limited, the priority is more about the safety of the forces than the safety of the citizens of the country, and unlike the limited forces, it is difficult to back a large contingent into a corner, which is what occurred for the Belgian UNAMIR troops.
The best way to solve humanitarian crises is not to send peacekeepers at all, but to send peace enforcers instead. Peace enforcers have the power to protect the oppressed victims in a way that peacekeepers do not, since peace enforcers do not have the same obligation to remain neutral. The peace enforcers can also survive with limited forces because they have the ability to overwhelm the other side and stop the conflict. Ultimately, sending peace enforcers in any number is the best option, as peacekeeping operations generally put more people at risk than they help.
Imagine two countries, so different from each other, that conflicts were inevitable. Athens and Sparta were not countries, however, they were city-states of Greece with many contrasting values. Athens was the city of the arts, reading, and writing. Meanwhile, military was the only thing the on the Spartans’ minds. Athens and Sparta differ in many ways due to their governments, economies, and cultures.
Ancient Greece today is most known for the culture: the gods, the dramas, how people lived. What most people do not realize is that there were hundreds, maybe even thousands, of different civilizations spread throughout Greece that all had different forms of government. The three main ones were Athens, Sparta, and Miletus. Each was very different from the other. The most powerful out of all three was Sparta: a military based society. The Spartan government had a strong foundation that was all torn down by one bad leader.
In the book, Hanson presents how the Peloponnesian war was started and so savagely pursued by Sparta and her allies due to their fear of Athens’ military strength and idealism. This fear caused the cataclysmic collapse of the Greek world. Athens lost the war and all ideas of the Athenian culture were destroyed. Hanson spends very little time addressing the true purpose of writing the book.
The arrival of multinational troops could bring more violence, destruction, and chaos to East Timor. On the other hand it could also bring protection to the many people who have fled the violence from the Indonesian Militia. Force should not have to be used to make or keep peace in any country; therefore it is not necessary for American troops to have to risk there lives trying to make peace in a country that won’t make peace until they get what they want, INDEPENDENCE. Sending troops into Dili, East Timor may help persuade the people to make peace, but it is not necessary to send all of those troops. Just a few mediators would be sufficient to help make peace. If the nations at battle would just talk they might be able to negotiate a peace treaty and there would be cooperation without more violence.
...on people face a similar fate in Darfur….” says one website. They say that America made promises to prevent any more bloodshed in the country, but never held up that promise. “The Khartoum government has systematically obstructed access to Darfur and blocked international efforts to establish a relief program,” says the web page. Because of the lack of effort Darfur suffers from the worst humanitarian crisis in the world today. In all of these events the UN will take steps after to rectify the situation and prevent it in the future. There is little to no way to guarantee that these kinds of tragedies will never happen again, however the UN can make steps to improve the world’s response and overall international and national laws to prevent future case as best as possible. Which is why the UN continues to update policies to keep up with the ever changing times.
Sparta and Athens - Explain and Contrast Both Sparta and Athens were Greek city-states. Sparta was a strict military ruled city-state where the people established themselves as a military power early. However Athens was more of a political city-state that was more involved with their economical stature than their military forces. Still changes from the Persian wars would change the powers of the city-state and somewhat unite them.
When examining the causes for the Peloponnesian War, which was between 431-404 B.C., there are a number of causes that factored into the cause of this war. However, one of the most important causes to this war was largely due to the fact that the Spartans feared the growing power and success of Athens. The Spartans were “particularly alarmed at the growing power of Athens” (Cartwright, “Peloponnesian War”). During the Persian war in 479 BC, Athens grew fiercely strong with power with help of its many allies and continued with their no mercy attacks on Persian territories. When the Persians left Greece, Athens further enraged Sparta when they built large and tall walls around its empire in the event of an attack, which was mostly thought to be from Sparta if it happened.
Athens and Sparta were both city-states in Classical Greece. While Athens embraced democracy, Sparta was a dictatorial fierce warrior state. Sparta was a militaristic community, Athens was a freethinking, and commerce minded city-state. Modern societies have modeled their government organizational structure and military discipline practices from lessons learned of these ancient city-states. There is much is to be praised regarding Classical Greece for their courage, their progressive thinking and the birth of democracy. However, I think it is important to remember that in both cases, Athens and Sparta were able to sustain their lifestyle on the backs of countless slaves, non-citizens and women and that there is a darker and less romantic side to the past.
Dating back to 449 B.C., Sparta and Athens always had an alliance, but as time grew that balance slowly began to fall as one felt threatened by another. Before any sight of unsteadiness the Spartans and Athenians had a bound partnership. Beginning after their domination of the Persian war, the two states slowly became aware of one another’s growing power. More time went by, and the Spartans began to grow conscious of the other states, feeling wary and paranoid around them (Fox, 170). No state was particularly to blame for the strain on their peace treaty, nor for the war, it came as the two states developed. Eventually the two states had clashed enough and declared war. Although the Spartans gave the Athenians a chance to back down and temporarily stall war, the two states would never be equal, their allies resented one another far too much. The growing urge for power was bound to take over sooner or later. Finally, after 7 years of uneasy tension, Sparta could wait no longer and declared war against Athens (Fox, 167). Although the Athenians and Spartans lived together in peace for so long, they existed in a fragile balance that was bound to eventually lead to war.
The human condition and its significance to International Relations have been in debate for centuries. Classical Realist thought has focused on the inherently aggressive and selfish nature of man and assumed that it is these qualities that ensure war and conflict are inevitable aspects of human society. Alternatively, neo-realism emphasises the system structure of international politics. R.J. McShea discusses the significance of the human nature tradition throughout the study of international relations. The endeavour to rid the world of the evil of war and the advancement of the conditions for peace have been developed from the assumption that the interaction of the states, and the way they ought to conduct relations among themselves, are dependent upon the nature of man. Thucydides' "History of the Peloponnesian War" is such a study of international relations. Not a philosophical work, it is considered of great importance within political and philosophical enquiry. In the "History," Thucydides attempts to disclose the underlying causes of the war between Athens and Sparta. He looks beyond the explicit clash of interest and Imperialist gains and endeavours to outline the implicit human motivations of fear, glory, and honour. The explicit motivations made war a continual threat; the implicit motivations and human interactions made it inevitable. It is this discussion within Thucydides' "history" that realists have taken as proof of his status as a founding father of realism; indeed, casual reading of the "History" may suggest this to be the case. However, it is my hypothesis that Thucydides was more optimistic of man, society and the possibility for peace. It is my intention to discuss Thucydides' assumptions of war and human na...
The UN was formed for the principle of advocating and maintaining international peace and security, which combines many responsibilities to re- picture the world in a new reasonable way. Tim Dunne describes United Nations as “a multi-purpose agency directed to specific goals including collective security, peace-keeping, health, environmental and human rights concerns” (Dunne, 2007, p.103). Provided that the UN is a ‘multi-purpose’ organization, it will be improper to explain its contribution to the international scene centered on a specific objective; therefore this paper will present a description of UN and its activities, followed by an empirical assessment of Realism in United Nations peacekeeping. The closing section will portray a perspective of the IR theory that is relevant to the UN role in maintaining peace and security.
One change they wish to fulfill is how they communicate locally and globally. They believe that communication is essential in achieving strategic plans effectively. In the past, ineffective communication has negatively impacted the peace keeping for a number of reasons including limited understanding of a culture or diverse views of the population. This has resulted in failures of expectations along with being unable to to sustain local support. Global communication is just as important as local communication because global communication builds public support internationally. If the media shows the conflict happening abroad, there is a better chance that the people of the world will intervene. In the documentary film, “Hotel Rwanda,” a journalist named Jack says to Paul Rusesabagina that it is not likely that people will intervene in the conflict because no one will care enough, “I think if people see this footage they 'll say, ‘Oh my God that 's horrible,’ and then go on eating their dinners.” Without global communication, people will not intervene or help out with the conflict, which is why the DPKO and DFS are aiming to develop public information activities to guarantee the awareness of information that has to do with peace keeping operations. Training and equipment is another factor in peace keeping that must be improved. Under-prepared personnel deploys to the field all the time, and as a result it often shows in challenging and remote environments. The Member States are trying to strengthen UN peace keeping’s training strategies by having experienced personnel to help. Equipment can be just as important in the field as well, it is essential to be fully equipped for building future capacity. Examples of equipment that could better the UN peace keeping strategies would be night vision equipment and naval vessels. Setting mission objectives and strategy is another change the UN plans
UN peacekeeping forces are facing huge challenges through history and this has the major reflection of UN performance we viewed through history. 1. Un doesn`t have a base location around the world (except one in the USA), and this reflects the relation and perspective with the rest of the world. 2. UN doesn’t have their own military, so they have to request military forces different countries after they get the approval from the UN representative. 3. The military they gather
The Melian Dialogue bears a host of political interpretations as the Melians and Athenians negotiate the reality of power and rights of countries on the scale of empires. Though Cleomedes eventually relied on the heavy handed realist course of action in the Peloponnesian War, ideally, he could have cultivated a healthy respect for differing universal truths of political theories and the fluidity of interpretation in every text available to us today.
” Pluralist approach would include something we call the "garbage-can" model. Cohen, M.D., March, J.D. and Olsen, J.P(cited Hansen, H 2011) defines that the Garbage-can model is a combination of possible solutions and a string of problems all mixed together for a decision. Hayes, S. L., & McGee, P. B. (1998) also agreed that garbage-can are issues, feelings, problems and opportunities tossed together for a decision. However the problem and solution may not be related and therefore ultimately the decision might not solve the problem but create others. Dallaire came up with decisions that were forced for solutions, solutions that he did not wanted to come up with. He faced a large number of unresolved issues or problems which eventually still went unsolved and led to the genocide. Driver et al (cited Eberlin, R. J., & Tatum, B. C 2008) show that individuals who look for minimal amount of information or resources can be categorized as "satisfiers. Peacekeeping in the UN was under the charge of DKPO. Dallaire knew he needed to win over the Security Council’s approval, but he could only recommend a solution that was small and inexpensive due to budgetary concerns. Being restricted and limited to the criteria, although Dallaire wanted a much larger peacekeeping force but