Women and the Draft
Men have always been looked upon as the leading sex. Looking back through history women have been the ones who take care of the home and children, while men are the ones who work and go to war. However in recent years there’s no doubt that women have become much more equal in the work force. Nevertheless men are still the ones who are forced to fight our wars when the time calls for it. Many think that women should be entirely equal to men having their choice to be drafted taken away but the fact is that they are physically at a disadvantage, too emotionally oriented, and the increase of female presence would have a more negative impact in the military in the way of social interactions.
The United States has made it very obvious that women have a hard time in the military with gender discrimination while serving their country. According to McSally (2011), “women now make up 14.6 percent of the U.S. military” (p. 1). Women are restricted from serving in more than 220,000 of those positions in the military. Some of these positions are artillery, tanks, Special Forces, and combat engineering. Since 2001, more than 255,000 women have been deployed to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, where more than 120 have been killed and 700 wounded (McSally, 2011, p. 2). The biggest problem with women being in the military is that they’re viewed as sexual prey. Also, women are paid lesser than men no matter what position they have.
On January 3, 2013 women were being considered for roles in ground-combat operations, causing a debate, can women effectively participate in combat? Some men and women are ready for the change and feel women can do anything a man can do. Others feel that it will affect unit cohesion and morale. Training standards being lowered to allow women to join more elite combat groups is another concern.
Just recently, the military lifted its ban on women in combat positions in the U.S. military. Many people think this is a good thing because it gets rid of the barriers between genders and shows fairness, but these people may not know the facts. It is not about fairness. It’s about effectiveness. It’s about having the deadliest military the world will ever see.
In late 1990 and early 1991, thousands of American women marched off to the desert sands of the Middle East to serve in a war that brought women closer to combat than ever before. Although restricting women from occupying military jobs that would put them into direct contact with the enemy can be interpreted as a form of sex discrimination, as a female veteran of Operation Desert Storm, I believe that the restriction should remain as it is. Lifting this ban would not be a strategic move for the United States. Socially, our country is unprepared to allow women on the "front lines" because of situations involving sexual harassment, prisoners of war, mothers marching off to combat, and female draftees.
The points stated by the author are something that can be agreed with. She introduces different viewpoints that would convince people that women should be allowed to go into combat. When considering the situation sexual harassment, talent, and gender; it doesn't really matter considering there are guys that are weaker and less athletic. Points that are talked about in the report lead to something in that are dealing with females not being strong enough but mostly the gender.
Why Women Should Not Fight on the Frontlines
What happened to men putting women and children first? Our society has always heard and grown up around men going to war to keep women and children safe, but now there is talk about letting women fight on the frontlines with men. This contradicts what our society has grown up knowing. There are women in the military helping out with many things like cooking, cleaning, tending to men with injuries, etc. Our nation needs women for all these important jobs but do we really need them to fight in combat?
Historically, only men have fought in wars. Other than a few exceptions, such as Joan of Arc, this has largely remained true to this day. However, in 2013, the Pentagon announced that by 2016, the ban preventing women from entering combat will be fully revoked. This means that women in the United States military will be placed into combat roles, such as Army and Marine infantry units, artillery, armor, Special Operations Forces, and the Navy SEALs. This shift, which will open more than 250,000 combat-related jobs to women in the military, has generated mixed feelings from those in the armed forces. A large number of female soldiers believe that this ban removal is simply a formalization. This is because women have been deployed at or near the front lines on many occasions (Memmott). However, according to a survey conducted by the Army on its 170,000 female soldiers, only a small handful are interested in combat jobs (Chappell). These mixed feelings may cause trouble among the ranks of female soldiers. Regardless, some people say that this will be a good change, and that woman should have the opportunity to fight in combat like their male counterparts. However, others argue that once the ban removal is in full effect, many significant problems will arise on both the battlefield and in the states.
According to Dictionary, “Feminism [is]: the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men.” Throughout history, women have fought the traditional viewpoints of the roles of women and have pushed past an abounding amount of boundaries. However, one blistering topic that is still being fought over today is, if women should be allowed in every aspect of the military. Since being allowed to join the military during World War 1, females have progressed through the ranks until being forced to stop when it comes to joining the elite groups of every branch. The controversial question that many military women face is, “If they wish to join these elite groups and meet the qualifications, why should we stop
Women have fought decades to be seen as equal as men. Women have to fit an image that is held for them. Women play male roles in the twenty first century. Setting women front line in combat is setting them up in a field full of grenades that represent distress emotion and the lack of physical strength that in the end will have a negative effect on females and their fellow soldiers they are fighting with. There are specific roles that only a male should take. For example, protecting and serving our country. Although some people believe that women should have equal rights, women have the disadvantage of fighting in combat where their safety is on the line and their physical and emotional restrictions will hold them back.