Animal Liberation Rhetorical Analysis

180 Words1 Page

In Singer's first chapter, Animal Liberation, he addresses many arguments against and for speciesism though his opinions and other philosophers. Singer explains speciesism as a prejudice or an attitude of bias against the interests a species that is not your own species. Singer quotes Jeremy Bentham who introduces the idea of suffering being a factor to consider the rights of slaves and animals. Singer further explains that the capacity to feel enjoyment and the ability to suffer "is a prerequisite for having interests at all." Additionally, another example of speciesism that Singer missed, when a nonhuman species is discriminated against in comparison to another nonhuman species. Specifically, responding to the interests of domestic dogs versus

Show More
Related

  • Camels Rhetorical Analysis

    642 Words  | 2 Pages

    From the beginning of the advertisement, we are shown the success of the doctor. The initial shot zooms out from the medical bag which we presume to carry supplies or tools of the medical trade. The doctor then gets into a nice automobile with an “M.D.” addition to his license plate. These signifiers reminds us of his success and authority. During the doctor’s “time out” that is few and far between, he chooses to smoke a Camel cigarette. According to a nationwide survey, more doctors smoke Camels than any other brand. Camels are reported as mild and good tasting. The final shot shows a

    Read More

  • Elephants Can Lend A Helping Trunk Rhetorical Analysis

    1179 Words  | 3 Pages

    Have you ever wondered how animals interact and work together to get a job done? Many times, animals put their minds together to complete a task. But what many people do not realize is that animals interact with one another just as humans would. In many instances, people don’t realize the amount of intelligence and common sense that animals, such as the elephant, possess. The study of elephant’s thoughts and thinking were explained and backed up through three different mediums. This information was explained through articles, videos, and passages. Combined, these pieces of work clarified what the experiment was, what it was testing, the purpose behind it, and how the different pieces were

    Read More

  • The Case for Animal Rights

    850 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, I agree with Tom Regan’s perspective of the rights view, as it explores the concept of equality, and the concept of rightful treatment of animals and humans. If a being is capable of living, and experiencing life, then they are more than likely capable of feeling pleasure and pain, except in a few instances. If humans are still treated in a respectable and right way even if some cannot vote, or think for themselves, then it is only fair that animals who also lack in some of these abilities be treated as equals. As Regan puts it, “pain is pain, wherever it occurs” (1989).

    Read More

  • The Omnivore's Dilemma Rhetorical Analysis

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    During this chapter of The Omnivore’s Dilemma Pollan talks about fast food. This means that he is speaking to people who regularly eat fast food and those who are wondering what is in their food when they order out. As a part of this he asks biologist Todd Dawson to run fast food items through a spectrometer to see how much corn is in the food. His analyses concluded that “soda (100 percent corn), milk shake (78 percent), salad dressing (65 percent), chicken nuggets (56 percent), cheeseburger (52 percent), and French fries (23 percent)” (p. 117). This is part of Pollan educating his audience of what is in their food when they go through the drive through. Speaking of his audience, his main demographic is to the people that are truly wonder

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of The Aspca's Animal Cruelty Commercial

    1876 Words  | 4 Pages

    Upon first receiving this assignment I was honestly not sure what I would do it on. Then I remember a very well done commercial from 2006. If you’re not sure what commercial I am referencing it is the ASPCA commercial with all the injured animals and "arms of an angel" playing in the background; furthermore, Sarah McLachlan voices over and stars in the commercial. The commercial does a good job of appealing to animal lovers sense of emotion (Pathos) through the photos and videos of helpless and beaten animals. Sarah McLachlan also appeals to animal lovers through the fact that she has been a longtime supporter of the ASPCA (Ethos). Also, the video includes statistics that can easily be proven these statistics help to support the commercials cause (logos). Finally, the commercial itself appeared on television which is a great medium to get a message across; in addition, this commercial is valid in any year and will always appeal to a

    Read More

  • The Environmental Issue From Hell Rhetorical Analysis

    573 Words  | 2 Pages

    Bill McKibben's "The Environmental Issue from Hell" argues that climate change is a real and dire concern for humanity. His essay deals with the methods and persuasive arguments needed to spur American citizens and the government on to change to more eco-friendly choices. The arguments he proposes are based largely upon emotional appeals calling for empathy and shame, and examples of what in our daily lives is adding to the changes we're seeing in the climate.

    Read More

  • The Greatest Good Peter Singer Summary

    806 Words  | 2 Pages

    Singer argues that as a society, we must not inflict pain or eat animals to increase social welfare. He also suggests that animals are just as important in society as humans are. Although

    Read More

  • Peter Singer, And Tom Regan, Peter Singer And Aldo Leopold

    1133 Words  | 3 Pages

    Within the guidelines of utilitarianism, Singer’s approach appears to harmonize, as he believed the goal in life should be to attain happiness and when the desirable level is reached, one should pay it forward. However, to the dismay of many, he believed that one born to pain and suffrage could not reach such pleasure therefore, had nothing to contribute to the environment and hence, such a life need not be continued and such a life furthered, would only be a strain on happiness. Singer’s judgement on moral behavior was that bringing pain into the world would only consume positive energy and could not further the benefits of happiness as, it is absent. In thinking that one’s existence should benefit environmental ethics as a whole or to those who need it most, Singer has said, “It is not enough that an environmental policy conform to the principles of some or other environmental ethic, it should conform to the correct, or best justified, one.” (p.285) Singer is also inclusive to animals within his statement as he considered animals just as equal in nature as humans. Essentially, he had a vision of animals being free from cruelties and exploitations such as factory farming. Extending happiness, to him, was meant only for people and creatures that could share it and, in accordance to his philosophy, deserved it in efforts to amplify well-being. Singer’s morally confusing ethics have added a unique wing in the developments of environmental ethics that, if anything, indulge in daring thoughts and help refine the purpose of

    Read More

  • Animal Farm Rhetorical Analysis

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    Manipulation of language can be a weapon of mind control and abuse of power. The story Animal Farm by George Orwell is all about manipulation, and the major way manipulation is used in this novel is by the use of words. The character in this book named Squealer employs ethos, pathos, and logos in order to manipulate the other animals and maintain control.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Animal Liberation By Peter Singer

    1464 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animals have been treat as if they are less equal in the moral sense. Over the recent years, the public has been more aware of the animal liberation movement. This movement opposes factory farms and animal experimentation; the movement demands animal equality. The animal liberation movement demands for the people to expand their moral capabilities, to recognize that animals should be treated as equals. However, it is hard for one to recognize that the moral inequality until it is forcibly pointed out to them. Peter Singer, author of “Animal Liberation,” has written about various ethical issues; widely known for his compassion and work on animal welfare. According, to Singer animals should not be held under immoral treatment by humans.

    Read More

  • Animal Farm Rhetorical Analysis

    1351 Words  | 3 Pages

    “The pen is mightier than the sword.” This is a popular saying that explains that, sometimes, in order to persuade or convince people, one should not use force but words. In Animal Farm, by George Orwell, animals overthrow the human leader and start a new life, but some animals want to become the new leaders. To make the other animals obey the pigs, they first have to persuade the farm’s population. Squealer is the best pig for this job because he effectively convinces the animals to follow Napoleon by using different rhetorical devices and methods of persuasion.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Argumentation In The Reality Of Zoos By Michelle Carr

    1034 Words  | 3 Pages

    Michelle Carr uses the rhetorical mode of argumentation for the purpose of persuasion in her article, “The Reality of Zoos.” Carr focuses on the issue of the imprisonment and maltreatment of zoo animals in her article. She effectively presents her points by using the persuasive methods of pathos and logos. Carr establishes an emotional connection with the reader by recalling an occasion she noticed how unhappy zoo animals were during a childhood memory. Carr also uses logic and reasoning; she appeals to the reader by using facts and figures about the suffering zoo animals experience, for instance, the animals developing “zoochosis” and the animals being forcibly inseminated for money-making purposes. By establishing an emotional connection

    Read More

  • Equality in Peter Singer´s All Animals are Equal

    2024 Words  | 5 Pages

    Singer makes a three-part argument for why “All Animals Are Equal”, or at the very least should be granted equal consideration. Firstly, he argues that, assuming all humans are awarded equal rights, there is no single characteristic apart from being human that grants them such rights. Secondly, he argues that awarding rights by virtue of humanity is arbitrary and speciesist. Lastly, he argues that sentience is the only characteristic that should be considered in terms of granting animal rights. This leads him to the conclusion that “if a being suffers, there can be no moral justification for refusing to take that suffering into consideration… The principle of equality requires that its suffering be counted equally with the like suffering – insofar as rough comparisons can be made – of any other being”.

    Read More

  • Animal Liberation by Peter Singer

    1078 Words  | 3 Pages

    Singer believes animals should have their rights considered. He is trying to point out how we should care about their interests regardless of the type of animal. The only difference between humans and an animal is that we are different species and we should have respect to one another because we are both living. Singer talks about how do we know if animals feel pain and basically says we feel pain but react differently unless you are born with no pain receptor which is dangerous. He later gives an example of a rat and rock getting kicked along the road, if you kick a rock nothing will happen because it's a rock and does not have feelings; however, kicking a rat is bad because it will suffer. This brings a good point such as how we humans kill animals for fun a...

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis: PETA

    937 Words  | 2 Pages

    The animal rights group, PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), is known for their forthright method of promoting vegetarianism. PETA has mainly used celebrities in slightly sexualized advertisements to advocate their claim that vegetarianism is the healthiest and best lifestyle. However, widespread outrage erupted in 2009 after the animal rights organization launched their “Save the Whales” campaign. The introductory campaign ad featured a billboard presumably shaming a woman for being obese, due to her meat-eating. As a result, the activist group was accused of “fat shaming”. PETA’s advertisement uses pathos to shame people into vegetarianism, ethos to support their claims that vegetarianism is a healthier lifestyle, and images

    Read More

More about Animal Liberation Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document