Analysis: What Does Laurie Paul Mean By Transformative Experience

1348 Words3 Pages

Hewson Ju Philosophy of the Mind Prompt: What does Laurie Paul mean by ‘transformative experience’? Explain with the help of an example. Why does she think there are special problems in deciding whether to undergo such experiences? Do you agree that there are these problems? Why or why not? Laurie Paul came up with the notion of a “transformative experience” to describe a set of experience that transforms you both epistemically and personally. She uses this idea to argue that it is almost impossible to make decisions both rationally and authentically in the face of a transformative experience. In this essay, I will argue that the all experiences are transformative experiences, and that our decisions for those experiences are still based from …show more content…

There are three different kinds of transformative experience: epistemically transformative, personally transformative, and transformative. An experience is epistemically transformative if the only way to know what it is like is to have it yourself. Examples of this would be trying a new fruit or seeing a new color. There is no way to convey this sensation to a person except through personal experience. Next, we have personally transformative experiences. A experience is personally transformative if it dramatically alters your point of view and preferences. Examples of this would be reading a powerful literature or volunteering in the homeless shelter. These experiences offer new perspectives and change your point of view. Lastly, an experience is transformative if it is both epistemically and personally transformative. Examples of this would be going to college or fighting in a war. There is no way for you to understand the experience or the person you will become until you embark on that …show more content…

This conclusion sounds pretty unlikely. After all, most our decisions are made after some thoughts and efforts. A more plausible explanation is that all decisions are made rationally and authentically. What Paul fail to realize is that even in a big transformative decision, an individual still uses the same decision model as before. While it may be harder since the experience is more abstract. An individual can still translate what they know of the experience into terms that they could understand. With this in mind, they could compare and contrast their utilities of different outcomes, and make genuine and rational decisions despite their uncertainty. In the vampire example, while I may not know how being a vampire would feel like, I do know scientifically that they have certain traits such as immortality and super strength. Thus, depending on how I value these traits, I can compare my current utility with my potential utility and maximize it based on my preferences. While it does require some thinking, you can still come to a rational and authentic decision like any other experience. This decision making process has become so streamlined in simple decisions that we don’t even realize we are participating in this analysis. It is only in the cases of big decisions that we have to think and carefully consider the outcome of each situation.

More about Analysis: What Does Laurie Paul Mean By Transformative Experience

Open Document