While in the 4th century, Mediterranean there was a lot turmoil. Philip of Macedon, Alexander the Great’s father, wanted to conquer the city-states of Greece. He was able to fulfill his dream and conquer them, then Philip of Macedon was killed and his dream wasn’t fully finished. Alexander wanted to follow in his father’s footsteps, but to do it bigger and better. So, Alexander was able to conquer the Persian Empire in 331 B.C. by facing off with the Persian army and when he took over, he was able to spread the Greek culture and their language. The Jews were also able to spread the word about the Greek culture in the Diaspora. By doing this Alexander the Great was able to make the Greek culture the most common culture in the region.
Philip
…show more content…
he achieved another one of his goals, but this one was right at the top of all his other accomplishments, Alexander the Great led his army and were able to defeat the Persian army and conquer the Persian Empire. Alexander dad’s name was Philip who was married to Cleopatra. The war began about 334 B.C. and Darius, Macedonian leader, was twenty-two years old, but was very intelligent because he has been ready for this war and was prepared. Darius prepared himself and his army by selecting the spot of the battle so that they would know where everything was at, know exactly when and where to go, and just made everything else perfect for his army that would give them edge to winning the war. The Persian seemingly already had the edge to winning before it all even got started. “The Persian army possibly had about 200,000 soldiers to Alexander’s 35,000 soldiers.”(Eye Witness) Darius had created the area of the battle’s ground to be flat, but Darius ordered his army to shift right hoping that Alexander’s army wouldn’t have any kind of advantage but attacking from the flat land and hopefully shift them to the rugged part of the land. But, Darius’s army ended up in the rugged, rocky terrain because they shifted right too much and they were forced to flee and Alexander the Great came out on top with the …show more content…
Alexander then returned as king and won Porus’ trust. In 325 B.B., Alexander wanted to keep moving so he decided to head north by the Persian Gulf. But many of Alexander’s army members were unable to keep some had illness, some were too tired, some were injured, and some had already died by this point in time. Many soldiers told him that great leaders have to quit some times, so Alexander did what they said. He knew it was the end, so he wanted a very large quantity of Macedonians to marry Persian princesses. Alexander did end up making the Macedonians very mad because recruited a lot of Persian soldiers, so he could dismiss the Macedonian soldiers and some of them were still willing to fight. They later convicted Alexander for adopting Persian customs and manners. “Alexander appeased the Macedonian soldiers by killing 13 Persian military leaders. The Thanksgiving Feast at Susa, which had been geared towards solidifying the bond between Persians and Macedonians, shaped up to be quite the opposite.”
Alexander adopted Persian governing practices, but he had little use for Persian culture. According to his Greek biographer Plutarch, he considered himself "a governor from God and a reconciler of the world." He hoped that Greek culture would, through his actions, permeate all of Asia, inspiring its peoples to pursue virtue, excellence, and truth. This heroic idealism blended with practicality in his plan to develop the Tigris, Euphrates, and Indus rivers as commercial waterways linking all of Asia These undertakings promised to be long and difficult, however, and Alexander was an impatient man. His soldiers' unwillingness to proceed past the Indus was a great disappointment to him, for which he compensated by throwing his own festivals and celebrations. Alexander showed early leadership qualities. When King Phillip invaded Thrace, he left Alexander in charge of Macedonia at the age of 16. During his father's absence, one of the Thracian tribes, the Maedi, rebelled. Alexander was able to mobilize an army and put down the rebellion. In 336 B.C, Alexander's father was assassinated, putting Alexander on the throne at the age of 20. Shortly after this, Alexander left Macedonia with his armies to put down rebellions in the countries of Illyria, Thrace and Greece, all of which had previously been conquered by King Phillip. Alexander then moved his armies into Asia Minor and began to conquer the peoples there. Among the countries conquered by Alexander were Syria, Phoenicia and
The statue of a man who resembles the physical appearance of God leaves many to wonder the power and strength of such a person. Who can this god-like person be? What did he do to deserve to be portrayed in such an honorable way in the Greek society in the fourth century B.C? This statue is of a man named Alexander III of Macedon or more commonly known as, Alexander the Great. His father, King Phillip II, took the throne of Macedonia in 359 B.C.E and was able to turn Macedonia into the strongest military power in the entire Greek world. Macedonia was a state in the north eastern region of Greece. Alexander III of Macedon was born in 356 B.C.E in Pella; the ancient capital of Macedonia, Alexander grew up in the shadow of his father’s success in transforming Macedonia into a great military power. As his father tried to end the rivalries between city-states in Greece in order to unite in a war against Persia, Alexander was being tutored by Aristotle and had been a part of military campaigns. His father, more so, raised his son to become a great leader which is no wonder why when King Phillip II was assassinated and Alexander III of Macedon took the throne. Alexander the Great was able to succeed by his military strategies which change the demographics of the conquered nations during his reign in 336-323 B.C.E.
Alexander began his military campaign and his rule much where his father left off. Whether or not it was his aim, this created a sense of normality for the men that was part of his father’s regime. Alexander’s position as a warrior-king who stood side-by-side among his men also served to create respect among his peers. Gradually, as Alexander conquered more Persian land, he began to adopt the policies of Persian rulers. Alexander’s change in policy extended beyond just political roles, he gave consideration to the local gods in many of the lands that he conquered. Eventually, Alexander brought people in from the conquered nations to serve under him.
Darius had an advantage over Alexander the Great, he had more troops, better resources, and he chose the battle field. Although Darius had the advantage he was not as smart as Alexander. Alexander had good communication with his troops; he planned according, in addition he was well organized before the battled. He did not stray away from his plan he stuck to it. Alexander troops were heavily armed they moved in formation, and they were shield with their long spears they stayed close together and moved in formation. In addition he did not have all his troops engaged in the battle at once he planned an awesome attack strategy that won him and his troops the war.
...ath the spread of Greek culture, language and art continued to modern day China, where Alexander never step foot on. This is a testament to how involved Greek culture was in Alexander’s vast empire . The universal language in Alexander’s empire was Greek, which lead to easy trading and easily fixed problems. Alexander dreamed to have a massive empire and to bring man together. Both of these were achieved in a decade. Even after his death the Greek language carried on and so did many other customs.
Alexander the Great was only 20 years when his father Philip of Macedon died. Even though he was a young man, he had an unusual talent for politics and military tactics. After his father’s death, Alexander moved to continue Philip’s invasion of Persia. In the ten years of his war campaigns, Alexander conquered a large portion of the then-known world. (Judge & Langdon, 2012.)
This was a warning to all other cities that questioned his leadership. When he went to Athens few opposed him. He made a deal with them. Athens' rulers gave him war supplies and soldiers so that they would destroy the Persian empire. In 335. B.C. Alexander had an army of 35,000 Macedonians and Greeks marching towards Persia. When he met the Persian ruler Darius III and his forces, Alexander had found victory at the battle of Gaugamela. Even though Alexander's army was smaller, war tactics won the battle. After that battle he was known as the Lord of Asia in Asia Minor. The battle also earned him the title of Pharaoh in Egypt. Like the people in Asia Minor the Egyptians had suffered years of being ruled by Persia. After conquering many empires he founded his own city at the banks of the Nile called Alexandria. Throughout his campaign Alexander had adopted many cultures. He wore Barbarian clothes and ordered those approaching him to bow in the Persian manor. This had angered his soldiers. It was at the age of 25 when he became the ruler of Greece, Persia, and western Asia.After the many battles he had fought, Alexander's soldiers could take no more
The year is 329 B.C. Alexander the Great is leading his army on a quest to conquer the known world. As he is preparing his army to cross the Indus River to attack the Indian Army, Alexander and all his troops watch in awe as two “great shining silvery shields spitting fire around the rims” seem to emerge from the heavens. These two “shields” dive repeatedly at his army until the war elephants, horses, and men all panicked and refused to cross the river where the horrendous incident occurred. The two “flying shields” disappeared into the sky as quickly as they had appeared. Seven years later, while attacking a Venetian city in the eastern Mediterranean, Alexander and both armies on either side of the conflict witness two objects materialize in the sky. Suddenly, one of the objects shot a beam of light at the city wall crumbling it to dust. The objects disappeared and Alexander’s army easily took the city with the wall gone (Sitchin 4-10). Most historians would consider these two incidents as false and dismiss them completely. But why would the ancients go through the trouble of documenting these events if they never actually happened? The answer is: they would not. The truth is, the events that Alexander the Great and his armies went through were not unique. There are countless accounts from the ancient world of objects appearing and disappearing in the sky (Sitchin 21). A lot of these accounts mirror modern day reports of UFO sightings. Obviously, extraterrestrial encounters are not a modern phenomenon. They have been around since the time of the earliest civilizations on Earth (Sitchin 58). All recorded accounts of extraterrestrial encounters throughout human history can be classified into one of eight categories.
Have you heard of a man named Alexander the Great, the famous historical figure? There are many amazing stories about him explaining the courageous things he had accomplished. However, if you learn more about him and his accomplishments you will soon realized the real person Alexander was. Alexander the Great, ruler of his empire was in fact not great as his title states. The definition of great is a person who shows concern for others, has leadership and shows intelligence. Alexander didn’t show any of these characteristics therefore he doesn’t deserve the title of “great”.
Alexander the Great (July 356BC – June 323BC) was King of the ancient Greek Kingdom of Macedon. By the age of thirty he had created one of the largest empires of the ancient world. He remained undefeated in battle and is considered one of history’s most successful Military commanders. Historians’ have offered theories which could explain Alexander’s motivation to conquer so much of the known world. Some suggest that Alexander was an idealistic visionary who sought to unite the world, whereas others argued that he was a fascist whose hunger for power drove him. The Ancient Greeks were driven by love of honour (philotimaea) and their desire for greatness. They were competitive, always striving to better one another.
“In 331 b.c., Alexander crushed the Persian king’s main army….. He subsequently proclaimed himself king of Asia in place of the Persian king” (Ancient Greece, 247) Alexander automatically appointed himself ruler and gave no option to the captured of whether or not they wanted to become citizens and pay his taxes, they were forced to. How Alexander treated the conquered and how he ruled the empire he built were very similar. He cared more about the land and overall size of his empire more than the people in it. Alexander allowed the basic structure of the local government and taxation to stay the same, “His policy seems to have been to create strength and stability by mixing ethnic traditions and personnel. As he had learned from Aristotle.” (Ancient Greece, 247) The way Alexander ruled this ever-growing empire seemed to be more hands off. Keeping their original internal structure allowed Alexander to continue his rule but from afar, but still wanted to be the most important, and he does this by having people address him as a god. (Ancient Greece, 249) This kind of superiority and imperialism was also continued in the Mediterranean rule, this began to worry the republic that they may see backlash from the concurred
Alexander the Great is hailed, by most historians, as “The Great Conqueror” of the world in the days of ancient Mesopotamia. “Alexander III of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great, single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in little more than a decade. Alexander was born in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia in July 356 BCE. His parents were Philip II of Macedon and his wife Olympias. Philip was assassinated in 336 BCE and Alexander inherited a powerful yet volatile kingdom. He quickly dealt with his enemies at home and reasserted Macedonian power within Greece. He then set out to conquer the massive Persian Empire” (Web, BBC History). It is important to note, which will maybe explain his brutal actions, that Alexander was only twenty years old when he became the king of Macedonia. “When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature and stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life” (Web, Project of History of Macedonia). “In, 340, when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 years old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, but as the Macedonian army advanced deep into Thrace, the Thracian tribe of Maedi bordering north-eastern Macedonia rebelled and posed a danger to the country. Alexander assembled an army, led it against the rebels, and with swift action defeated the Maedi, captured their stronghold, and renamed it after himself to Alexandropolis. Two years later in 338 BC, Philip gave his son a commanding post among the senior gener...
Spread of the Koine Greek language was rapid and provided a means of communication and power for indigenous peoples who learned the language. The New Testament of the Bible was also written in Koine Greek. Alexander brought Greek culture to the world in a way that was not achieved during the Hellenic era. The idea of the universal culture of the Hellenistic era similarly influenced the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire also assimilated conquered peoples into the empire, and attempted to establish Roman influence in conquered lands. Hellenic Greece was also valuable in the amount of philosophical ideas, art, and culture. However, in the Hellenistic era, the spread of Greek influence was important and led to the greatest impact on the future. Without the spread of Greek influence the ideas of Cleisthenes, Aristotle, Alexander, and of Greek scientists would have remained in Athens as well as the Grecian peninsula. Also, Alexander revived the declining progress in Athens and all of Greece due to war and internal conflict, and united Greece, for the most part, against a common foe, the Persians. The impact of the Hellenic age would not have been realized without the assistance from Alexander’s
Alexander II has been considered “a great historical figure without being a great man, that what he did was more important than what he was.” ( W.E Mosse) For 26 years, Czar Alexander II ruled russia. During his reign, he made his mark on history by stepping outside of the box and going to extreme measures to help his people. He has been labeled as the “Liberator of tsar” for the ending of serfdom. Czar Alexander II of Russia has made an impact on history because of his interesting background, fatal assassination, and the changes made after his assassination.
There are many leaders in the world, but a great ruler is passionate, honorable and one who can inspire even in the most hopeless circumstances. Alexander the Great was a great ruler. Alexander the Great was a ruler that was not only inspiring, but he was fearless, smart, bold and courageous. Alexander the Great inspired his soldiers to crave more. He has inspired people since the day he started ruling. What is inspirational about Alexander the Great is that he inspired his troops to the point that they did not question him when they were outnumbered three to one in a battle, they trusted him with their lives and were willing to die for him (Alexander the Great: man behind the legend).