Alexander Hamilton’s First Federalist Paper

Both Thoreau and Emerson argue that asserting one’s opinions is crucial to attaining a better society. Emerson decries the danger of societal conformity and challenges the reader to “speak what you think now in hard words” in order to remedy it (Emerson 367). Likewise, Thoreau speculates that if “every man make known what kind of government would command his respect” it would be “one step toward obtaining it” (Thoreau 381). With these remarkably similar statements, both transcendentalists appeal to the reader’s patriotism by using language evocative of the agitated and outraged colonial Americans who demanded the people’s voice be heard in government. Although published roughly a half century later, “Self-Reliance” and “Civil Disobedience” mirror the sentiments of famous Revolution-era leaders such as Thomas Paine and Patrick Henry.

“To ignore good, evil, religion, morality and immortality”. Machiavelli said you have to adjust to his actions in order to strengthen his state One thing that stood out to me was the question weather it is better to be loved more then feared. That is a great question he bought up. I think every politician wants to to be loved more then feared but, it is much safer for a leader to be feared then loved. As he talked about rather being feared he knows what decisions are going to be okay to make and not decide to harsh on one.

“The government is best which governs least.” This is Henry David Thoreau’s motto which points out the importance of men having the will to take action in right time, to break law, and to be an extremist which enable the least government to be existed. However, ironically, Martin Luther King Jr. once imprisoned for being untimelyness, willing to break law, being an extremist when he takes non-violent resistance against racism. Through their writings, they prove the importance of taking action which is inevitable against lopsided justice. For Martin Luther King Jr., the government and the white church leaders abuse the God-given human rights, and for Henry David Thoreau, the government disrupts human conscience by holding slavery and Mexican War. Through their writings, they define the right time, just law, and an extremist.

Hamilton appeals not only to society’s desire to escape “the abyss” of anarchy that awaits them if they do not respond quickly to the fundamental disparities of the Articles, but also to “make a firm stand for our safety, our tranquility, our dignity, our reputation”(102). By expressing the urgency of the situation, Hamilton is attempting to compel the Anti-federalists to compromise some of their beliefs in order to save the Union. The significance of Federalist Paper 15 to the ratification of the United States Constitution was immense in that it provided a thorough evaluation of the deficits of the Articles of Confederation and promoted a sense of urgency to the American people in the direction of adopting a new centralized government to prevent the United States from falling into the feared state of

This dialogue personalizes his article to include consequences and responsibilities for both himself and his reader. As the article cont... ... middle of paper ... ... critical it is to understand the consequences of improperly managing national power. Without question, William J. Fulbright validates his claim of America moving beyond its ability to execute policy and influence the international community in an effective manner. Establishing pureness in his motivation for writing, invoking internationally held perceptions, and by creating a highly emotional article, Fulbright succeeds in creating awareness in the potential demise of American society. If America fails to heed the warning presented by Fulbright, the nation is destined to repeat, rather than re-write, the end of other great nations; nations whose existence now resides only in the thin pages of the annals of history.

To protect against the caprices of wicked men, the number of representatives of the people will be a quantity that stymies the influence of the few but is able to, as Madison states, “guard against the confusion of a multitude”. Madison then references his belief in the common sense and good will of men in that “the suffrages of the people” is likely to result in the election of men most deserving and fit for their roles as representatives and lawmakers. Madison presents an avowal that counters one of the Anti-Federalists’ major grievances: “[t]he federal Constitution forms a happy combination” with “the great and aggregate interests being referred to the national, the local and particular to the State legislatures”; Anti-Federalists feared that a stronger

He clearly points out towards man’s poor behavior in politics and accepts it as a fact, saying that law is a type of combat. He does not look up to god or any other divine authority for the political morality, like Augustine in his book ‘the city of god’ or try and look at things the way they should have been in the ideal state, but instead probes into the individual. He aims straight at the reality of politics. Machiavelli In his vision, to guide the actions of men in general, turns to the actions of the strong prince. Machiavelli’s higher political morality is to pursue the means to gain and hold power.

Compelling enough to sway much of the undecided colonists to agree that revolt is the necessary course of action. Paine states in the introduction to Common Sense "a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at fist a formidable outcry in defense of custom." This argument is not one of listing injustices or even reasons for revolt but it does provoke the reader to decide if his thoughts are genuine or from not thinking critically about the times and situations. Now that we my "suffer ourselves to examine the component parts of the English Constitution," the faults shall be found. Paine argues one theoretical position that could influence those loyal to the King himself.

Federalists such as Hamilton supported ratification. But Anti-Federalists, who feared that the document gave too much power to the federal government, worked to convince the states to reject it. Hamilton believed that the ratification was necessary because giving more power to the central government was essential for the nation's survival. In The Federalist Papers Hamilton sets the stage for those that would follow, entitling that "The vigor of government is essential to the security of liberty." The essay... ... middle of paper ... ...details of the new government and its different parts.

He says "We find ourselves trusting certain people who constitute our means of junction with pretty nearly the whole realm of unknowable things. Complete independence in the universe is completely unthinkable." The main idea of the book was the basis of public opinion and foreign policy will only be better formed when the basis of public opinion is overhauled. This is best summarized when Walter Lippmann said, "It is because they are compelled to act without a reliable picture of the world, that governments, schools, newspapers, and churches make small headway against the more obvious failings of democracy, against violent prejudice, apathy, preference for the curious trivial as against the dull important, and the hunger for sideshows and the three legged calves"