Drones Pros And Cons Essay

Drones in the Air

Should countries be allowed to use drones in modern countries? Since the installment of drones in warfare, the unmanned aerial combat vehicle has proven to be quite an effective tool. Nowadays, the efficiency of drones has overpowered the opposing arguments since it has more pros than cons. By defining the importance to keep military personnel safe, by providing coherent data on civilian lives, and by refuting the significance of drones to keep terrorism at bay, one will be enlightened to see that drones are the way of the future. Life could be argued to be one of the most precious things on Earth. For this very reason, why should the men and women who protect their country take unnecessary risks? As stated in Source J, " Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and their affiliates often operate in distant and environmentally unforgiving locations where it would be extremely dangerous for the United States to deploy teams of special forces to track and

However, with drones, civilian fatalities are considerably less if they are compared with other forms of warfare. According to Source J, drones create less unintended damage to people and property than traditional weapons, such as war bombs, shells, mines, mortars, because drones have technical precision to limit casualties to combatants and intended targets. With such accuracy, drones can kill one person in a room of a house and spare the lives of those who are in the other rooms. While it may be argued that drones are dangerous because they have killed an estimated 1,047 civilians, this amount is miniscule compared to WWII stats. As stated in Source J, "... roughly 8-17% of all deaths from US drones. In comparison, in World War II, civilian deaths, as a percentage of total war fatalities, are estimated at 40 to 67%. In the Korean, Vietnam, and Balkan Wars, the percentages are approximately 70%, 31%, and 45%