Agile Software Development Methodologies

analytical Essay
1636 words
1636 words

The conventional software development methodologies projects have failed to overcome the problem of volatility in the present project management processes in organizations. This is because they are mostly linear and sequential, imposing a significant challenge when meeting changing user requirements. Volatility in user requirements has been a significant predicament until the discovery of agile project management methodologies such as scrum, Extreme programming, and Future driven development. Volatility originates from the urge of organizations to cope with varying technological structure and market dynamics (Cockburn, 2002). Conventional software development methods, including sequential and linear processes, cannot meet changing user requirements, but have shown their efficacy in meeting consistent requirements. These challenges have increased sophistication and inter-reliance of systems subjecting the usual methods to extinction. The concept of agile software development refers to an iterative method employed when determining the necessities of software development projects with regard to flexibility and intensified interaction. Apparently, agile software development methodologies are more advantageous than conventional methods. The supporting facts to this statement reveal why scrum and XP are increasingly emerging as preferable techniques. The main purpose of this is to discuss the criteria used to support the claim that agile software development methodologies are a superior design method. This paper affirms that agile software development methodologies are more effective than the conventional project methodologies because they are simple, iterative and incremental, resulting in efficacy in meeting changing customer requirements....

... middle of paper ...

...Some of the disadvantages that have opposed the rise to popularity of agile methodologies include insufficient requirements, paired programming in XP, evolution of agile requirements, and product testing. References Cockburn, A. (2002). The 'Secondary' of the 'Secon Agile Software development methods join the “would be” crowd. Cutter IT Journal, 6-12. Favaro, J. (2002). The 'Secondary' of the 'S Managing Requirements for Business Value. IEEE Software, 56. Highsmith, J. & Co., Ltd. (2002). The 'Secondary' of the 'Se Agile software development ecosystems. New York: Addison-Wesley Professional. Palmer, S., & Felsing, J. (2002). The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary A practical guide to Feature-Driven Development. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2002). Agile Software Development with Scrum. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

In this essay, the author

  • Argues that agile software development methodologies are more effective than conventional methods because they are simple, iterative and incremental, resulting to efficacy in meeting changing customer requirements.
  • Cites cockburn, a., "agile software development methods join the "would be" crowd."
  • Explains that extreme programming is essential in improving software development projects in five key ways including communication, feedback, respect, courage, and communication.
Continue ReadingCheck Writing Quality

Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!

  • Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!
Continue Reading