Advantages Of Smoking In Public Places Essay

That’s their choice, but does that give us the right to take their right to smoke away? Secondhand smoke may be harmful to everyday people, but there is plenty of other air toxics, and pollutants out there that can cause the same problem as secondhand smoking does. Smoking should be banned in scattered areas. Playgrounds are a huge one. Children are not fully developed and should not be exposed to secondhand smoke.

The best thing to do for your body is to stop smoking and to never start (Thompson 1 of 2). Smoke stays on the walls, floors, clothing and toys smoke is everywhere (HANSSEN 1 of 2). Therefore smoking should be banned in public spaces because it causes harm to the smoker's body, as well as causing unwarranted health and economic problems for the public. People smoke in many places. Buses, hospitals, libraries, restaurants, bars, banks and even some places that smoking is not allowed (Mwita 1 of 3 ).

In conclusion, smoking must be prevented in public places because it has many bad effects. Smoking might lead to diseases and cause damage our bodies, spreads bad smells in the places, and kids in the public places might learn smoking from the adults. Some people are annoyed from smoking and they get upset if they sit in smoking places. They do not want to breathe second hand smoke. As smoking in public places has negative consequences on non-smokers, it shall be prohibited in any public place.

The government in Fahrenheit 451 and the parents in our society today restrict the freedoms of the citizens to do what they want. They ban and challenge for the simple purpose of not wanting society to be transfixed on something unrealistic or unacceptable in the real world. Parents in our society are our fireman because they remove books they don’t like for their children or other students to not

Secondhand smoke is a very big danger in public places and is putting people at risk. Some people completely ignore the health risks of not just themselves, but also the people around them. The reason smoking is already illegal in places such as public restaurants is because of the toll smoking may have on the people around them. Not only should other public places be allowed to ban smoking, but they should take these issues that come along with it and get rid of it altogether. As most people already know, tobacco kills.

Although cigarette smoking is simply a matter of personal choice and not especially promoting use by any particular segment of the population, the government should ban cigarette smoking because it increases the risk of cancer and heart disease, harms the secondhand smokers, and negatively affects newborn babies. Admittedly, many would argue that cigarette smoking should not be banned because it is to take away the smoker’s liberties from them. For example, smoking bans deprive citizens of both the freedom to choose their actions and the freedom to be responsible for those actions (Lee et al.1). Moreover, “legislation banning smoking prevent individual smokers from exercising their right to smoke, these laws prevent individual organizations, workplaces and places of business from choosing whether or not to enforce rules against smoking”(1). To summarize, supporters of cigarettes smoking believe that smoking ban is an abuse of human rights of smokers.

But smoking will always affect others and the environment in bad ways. So, a person who wants to smoke can only do so by keeping himself in isolation. In conclusion, public smoking is a danger to smokers, as well as non-smokers and should be banned entirely. Enforcing laws, raising awareness, starting a petition, contacting a city, county or state official, is a few ways that will help to get this issue resolved. Second-hand smoke is a risk to everyone and public smoking allows it to reach all types of people.

Their opinion is that it is unfair to expose anyone to this danger and should be banned no matter if it violates the smoker’s freedom to choose. However, by prohibiting smoking in public areas and restricting it only to a certain place prevents smokers from fair participation in their social life. The main goal of the smoking ban is to make it socially unacceptable to smoke, which helps force smokers to quit. Medical studies have been conducted and published that show the dangers of smoking and the effects of second hand smoke. The research is very vague though and never truly shows you the exact causes.

It has been said that some feel certain areas should be off limits to smokers because of the danger it can cause to others. In my opinion even though there are certain limitations there’s always a way around it, meaning smoking in public still seems to somehow find its way of harming others. Tobacco smoke can cause strokes, heart disease and even cancer. Smoking ... ... middle of paper ... ...continine in smoke can cause infertility, so now it not only has the effect to limit one’s lifespan but also it could prevent fertility to produce life. If a mother decides to smoke while pregnant it could cause her child to become dependent on tobacco also.

Smoking in restaurants, bars and pubs should be banned in Slovakia Smoking. Annoying habit that interferes with nonsmokers and smokers themselves too often. For centuries people around the world are subject to it, regardless of age, gender or race. Some smoke because they consider it to be modern, to fit into some games and some because it calms them down. The most often we get in touch with cigarettes is in restaurants, bars and pubs, and therefore as a non-smoker I personally think, and I will show you that smoking in these areas should definitely be banned.