Advantages Of Media Pluralism

1343 Words3 Pages

How to reach media pluralism There are two main challenges regarding the way to grasp pluralism: one is related to how measure it and upon this, what kind of regulations could and should be enhanced in order to guarantee standards that contribute to strengthen democracy. Regarding this effort, Behmer analyze, compare, and discuss some of the international attempts to measure freedom of expression. He highlights weaknesses and strengths of four international rankings (Freedom House, Reporters without Borders, and two more studies under a qualitative frame). Generally speaking, Behmer highlights methodological problems (what and how they measure, as well who do it); the NGOs’ agendas behind the scenes (especially in both Freedom House and RWB), and a libertarian understanding of freedom of expression as a negative freedom (“freedom from”) rather than a positive freedom (“freedom to”). This implies that the measurement analyzed emphasize the role of the States in freedom of expression’s problems, but omit other structural problems. Behmer’s critique de-naturalized rankings of freedom of expression and opens up ways through which to contribute to improve this debate. Despite their shortcomings, all these surveys demonstrate the international interest on the topic and also provide valuable service. So, a regional set of regulations has been built upon previous national experiences. As several authors point out that, despite the pressure in order to relax regulations on public media systems and the huge influence of technologies in reshaping media landscape as a whole an public outlets, particularly, they are still fundamental in societies in which they currently operate (Curran et al., 2014; Cushion, 2011; Benson and Powers, 2011; Czepek, Hellwig, and Nowak,

Open Document