Adams Car Dealership Argument Analysis

724 Words2 Pages

The promotional campaign by Cable Communications Corporation argues that all business would benefit from advertising with the cable television company in the form of increased profitability. As evidence to back up this assertion, the promotional campaign notes the experience of the Adams Cars Dealership, a recent advertiser with Cable Communication Corporation. Over the last 30 days, Adams Cars has seen a 15% increase in sales over the previous month. The argument as it now stands is unconvincing because it is missing evidence that would make the argument more well reasoned. It also suffers from poorly defined vocabulary, which makes the argument less easy to understand.

The argument PRESUPPOSES that the example of the Adams Car Dealership …show more content…

The first piece of such vocabulary is the word "recently".From just this word, it is impossible to tell when the advertising began. If Adams' advertising began three months ago, it would be very impressive that sales increased 15% between month two and month three of the advertising campaign. Why would there not have been a boost before the most recent month? If the promotional campaign told business owner exactly when Adams began advertising, the owners would have a better ability to evaluate the argument's conclusion. The author should also clarify the phrase "increase your profits". The promotional campaign's argument gives no details on the fees associated with advertising with Cable Communications.If Adams Cars had to develop an ad and pay large sums to Cable Communications to run the ad, the total cost of advertising with the cable company vey well may have exceeded the addtional profits derived from increased sales. Without additonal information in this regard, business owners cannot possibly evaluate the argument's …show more content…

The argument presupposes that the 15% increase in sales at Adams Car Dealership is a direct result of the recent advertising campaign with Cable Communications Corporation. It could be that the dealership had announced a sale for this month or that the previous month's sales were seasonably low- for example sales in March might always be better than sales in February due to some exogenous factor. Im order to better believe that Adams benefited from the advertisigng campaign with Cable Communications, business owners need evidence that there was not some other factor causing the 15% increase. Perhaps evidence could be shown comparing the last 30 days of sales with the same period in the previous year, or the last time the dealership was running the same

Open Document