Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on organizational change management
Concept of organizational change
Organizational change model
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on organizational change management
3.6 Step Six: Create Short-term Wins
Organisational change is not a short-term process, it requires great amount of patience to feel the process of change. Challenge is to cope with uncertain behaviours that can result in the failure of entire process. If organisation targets low-cost and short-term it can create short-term wins. Conspicuous performance improvement changes the mind-set of people. During the change process, NADRA gave more emphasis on short-term corporate goals. Initially more focus was given to the software development and software integration; later on the focus has expanded to provide technology solutions to other countries. Now NADRA is offering wide range of solutions for domestic as well as international market including Multi- Biometric e-Passport, Automated Border Control, Integrated Solution for Multi-Biometric Identity Cards, Vehicle Monitoring and Identification System, Electronic Point of Sale System, Facial Access Control System, RFID Driving License, Machine Readable Seafarer Identity Document, Biometric Identification & Payment Solutions etc. NADRA has become the Asian leader for providing identity-based multi-biometric technology solutions.
3.7 Step Seven: Consolidate Improvements
Organisations should avoid celebrating premature victory as it often derails the on going thrust and drive. In order to see the change successfully implemented, organisations should definitely keep track of small. Learning is an on going process and organisations should keep learning about new developments, even after implementing the change. If the organisation stop the process of learning and does not rediscover itself over the period of time, then it can never become a self sustain organisation. NADRA has always ke...
... middle of paper ...
... efficiently managed to transform itself in a successful database and registration organisation of Pakistan. Organisational change can be a slow and daunting process. Longer-term success is never guaranteed but adapting to change and sustaining it over the period of time can surely take the organisation to the new heights of success. NADRA has not only implemented the organisational change efficiently but it has also proven that with great vision, transformational leadership, clear mission, and persistence any organisation can accomplish change effectively. This case has underlined the major elements that have resulted in outstanding success of NADRA. Even though NADRA possesses effective managerial, strategic and operational control in Pakistan but still it requires efficiency and accuracy not only to fully control identity fraud but also to increase its clientele.
Therefore, a reassessment of the controls we have in place would be necessary. Ed’s previously mentioned tasks, when completed, will lay the foundations for our revamped security system. To supplement this, we will need to rework our security policies and create an incident response plan. This will include creation of a RACI matrix so that everyone is aware what role they play in the successful implementation of this plan. As we are storing credit card data, we should also consider being PCI DSS compliant. This would require us to conduct an audit of our current systems and run it by a checklist to make sure we are up to the required standards of PCI. Furthermore, we will need to appoint a dedicated Chief Information Security Officer whose task will be to develop the company’s long term information security program which will align with the company’s
Organizational Change "The effectiveness of organizational change is greatest when a firm’s strategy is consistent with environmental conditions and there is internal consistency." (D A Nadler, 2003:204) The only thing that is constant in this world is change and this is widely acknowledged by many in the world, may it be a corporation or a social forum or a governmental body. What comes in this world has to experience change in the light of environmental elements and pressures and influences, internal or external. The study of organizational behavior gives that environmental factors are the political, legal, economic, demographic, technological, social and societal. While these are the external environmental factors that are and cannot be counted among the controllable factors for an organization, they do in fact influence organizational structure, policies and strategies. In turn, the internal environment of the organization, that is very much controlled by the management of the organization and comprises of the top to bottom managerial levels, the staff, the employees, the board of directors, the owners etc. this internal environment, is to a great extent the result of external environmental factors, the change of which results in the direct impact on the internal environment of the organization. As such in lieu of external environmental factors; change agents with in the organization tend to accept the change in their external factors and tries to bring about a compatible change within the internal environment of the organization. The effectiveness of the change that is being brought about with in the organization as a result of the changing external environmental forces is best when, as described by Nadler, the internal facto...
Organizational changes are constant in both the public and private sector. Some changes are small and easily managed and others are large scale vision changes. With organization-wide changes, such as a redirection in the organizations vision, strong creative leaders are needed to ensure the vision is sold to the employees and that the change is implemented smoothly. The Virginia Department of Corrections (VADOC) has recently changed visions to strengthen the way we create long term public safety. This change in mission and vision statements was a smooth process but has not been implemented without its share of issues.
Management and leadership are viewed as two different perspectives in the business environment. As described by Dr. Warren Bennis ‘Managers are people who do things right, while leaders are people who do the right thing’, this means that managers do things by the set rules and follow company policy, while leaders follow their own intuition, which may in turn be of more benefit to the company.
Organizational change is a very big risk for organizations. The process of change can be very difficult for employees as well as the leaders implementing the changes. The changes are usually planned to improve the company. However, sometimes change can destroy a company when things don’t go as planned. From a change in management to a change in the company structure, or way of doing daily task, organizations must carefully execute the process of change and use change strategies that will ensure success.
Change is actually one of the things in life that can never be avoided, no matter how hard we try; it is the one constant in life. When it comes to organizations however, change can often be difficult, if not impossible, depending on a number of factors including employee receptiveness. There have been many studies completed on the cause of resistance to change. In Coch and French’s research study (1948) they asked two important questions surrounding resistance, “(1) Why do people resist change so strongly? and (2) What can be done to overcome this resistance?” Most change program experts will certainly name resistance to change as one of the largest obstructions to successfully executing change programs.
In order to lead and be successful you have to be willing to embrace change. Myatt (2012) explained that “leadership demands fluidity, which requires the willingness to recognize the need for change, and finally, the ability to lead change”. Change needs to be recognized in every organization. Organizations must undergo change to subsist. Each area of an organization needs to be assessed to lead change properly. Lastly, the change process must be managed. It is demanding that change agents are arranged for success and not failure by providing them with the proper tools, talent, resources, responsibility and authority necessary for the job (Myatt, 2012).
Miller, D and Friesen, P (1980) ‘Momentum and revolution in organisational adaptation’, Academy of Management Journal, 23/4: 591-614
The Strengths and Limitations of a Rational, Strategic Approach to Organisational Change Introduction Following the brief introduction of a model-ideal conceptualisation of Organisational Goal-Directed-Activity, and the definition within the perspective defined by this model of such terms like 'rational (organisational) action system', 'strategy', and 'organisational change', the first part of this essay presents a non-evaluative summary of a selection of distinct approaches to organisational change. Various approaches to strategy are similarly addressed in an attempt to register and explore some of the links that have been identified by a number of authors between positions on strategy reviewed and corresponding approaches to organisational change. The second part, bypassing the rather common practice of partitioning the set of organisational change approaches into largely non-overlapping rational and nonrational, strategic and nonstrategic, subsets, identifies a number of distinct Rational and/or Strategic Modes, associates them with the approaches to organisational change reviewed in the first part, and attempts an integrated appraisal of the distinctive strengths and limitations such diverse Modes confer to the approaches to change that invoke and utilise them. 1. A Model-Ideal Conceptualisation of Organisational Goal-Directed-Activity, Rationality, Strategicality, and Organisational Change When planned and goal-directed, fully rational organisational action, like any other ideal form of goal-directed-action, relies on activity generated by the decomposition of a goal-structure, a term that has been defin... ...
The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used
The goal of organizational change management is to create a prosperous work environment through strategic change and applying those changes through the people side of management. Organizational change management is a branch of handling the outcome and strategies of new business processes, changes in organizational structure or cultural changes within a company. There are multiple components in understanding the techniques and goals of Organizational change management. The first part discussed will be on setting goals for an organization as it can be a complex process because if aimed too high, the goals will most likely not be attained and performance will deteriorate.
In the article “Working to Transform Your Organization”, the issue of tackling an organization’s needed changes amongst a bureaucratic national system is a difficult one. Fortunately, they become very attainable if certain steps are taken. These outlined concepts when combined with an opportune situation yield a positive result, it seems, when associations are no longer relevant or efficient. The Department of Defense, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the Veteran Health Administration were all examined. It was determined within their case studies that eight common lessons emerged among them. These lessons are proven that when implemented, they have the opportunity to make the pertinent modifications to bring the largest organizations in line with their purpose. These ideas could be used on an organization such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, otherwise known as the NAACP.
Robbins et al. (2011, p. 186), states ‘Change is an organizational reality and affects every part of a manager’s job’. Today’s wave of change primarily created by economic condition so change is now such a constant feature of organization life (Goodman, E. 2011, p.243). Organizations need to be changed at one point or another in structure, technology or people. These changes are defined as organizational change (Robbins et al. 2011, p.18). Organizational change is important because changes can increase effectiveness and efficiency, the innovation of products, services as well as dealing with changes in external and internal forces (Goodman, E. 2011, p.243). However, ‘the bottom line is that organizational change is difficult because management systems are design and people are rewarded for stability’ (Lawler, E.E. & Worley, C.G. 2006, p.11).
The article “Organizational Change management” is majorly based on addressing and evaluating different literatures and views related to the organizational functions in terms of change management and the impact of behavioral changes and psychological contract within employee and employer on the proper execution and success of change management. The illustration of organizational change management has highlighted different approaches adopted and executed by number of organizations. The rapid changes in economical and political factors of external business environment as well as the introduction of complex and globalized business practices has influenced a number of businesses to accept the practice of continuous change management in terms of coping up with the competitive environment.
Organisations as machines, political systems, organisms, and flux and transformation are particularly common assumptions that are often used by managers, writers and consultants to make sense of how organizational change works. In reality most organizations use combinations of approaches to tackle change and not just one of the above, however these provide useful insights into the process of organizational change (Cameron and Green, 2012). This essay will try to make sense out of these assumptions to understand what organisational change is. By doing so, insights will be drawn on how organizational change can be managed and led.