Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay causes of global financial crisis of 2008
Causes and impacts of financial crisis 2008
How Internal and External Factors Affect Organizational Change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay causes of global financial crisis of 2008
Why do organizations change? With time goes by, rapid development of science and technology had led us to a world full of competitions. Change and stay alert to keep up with the current trend is essential asset to survive in this aggressive global economy. As the framework indicated by Pettigrew, there are two key context factors makes a great deal of effects on the reason for companies to change. Those are outer context and Inner context. Outer context could refer to the surrounding environment around the firm and the global economics status, etc. Inner context could be downsizing, restructuring the Gestalt, or the problem with coherent design archetype. Under the stress of the outer and inner context, forces or triggers will bring out the revolution. Change can be seen in a short term way and also in a long term way. Short term change could be a sudden, discontinuous and frame-breaking rupture which has an impact on the whole organisation, or new forms of management ad structure of the firm itself, or the breakthrough created by the major innovations or even can refers to the impact of new product and new market opportunities. Normally, financial crisis will be an initiative as a trigger to revolution. At first of the revolution, there would probably already has small changes in normal management and structure. As a long term way to apply the change, change agents are needed to do an ongoing, continuous and gradual progression or give some simpler initiatives such as improvements to existing products and product range.
Van de Ven, A.H. and Poole, M.S. (1995) defined “Change” as a type of event, which is an empirical observation of difference in form, quality, or stat over time in an organisational entity. The entity may be an ...
... middle of paper ...
...n many discrepancies and imbalances. Thus, a major stimulus is required to prompt a revolution and an important note of caution in interpreting the findings is focus has been on significant general tendencies and not a condition that holds for all historical sequences. The findings represent significant tendencies in the sample and the study has given a small insight into the dynamics of adjustment among the organisations.
Bibliography
Hedberg, B., Nystrom, P., & Starbuck, W. Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organisation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21, 41-65.
Miller, D and Friesen, P (1980) ‘Momentum and revolution in organisational adaptation’, Academy of Management Journal, 23/4: 591-614
Van de Ven, A.H. and Poole, M.S. (1995) ‘Explaining development and change in organizations’ Academy of Management Review, 20/3, 510-40
S, Rawat 2001, Organisational Change and Forces Prompting Change, Academic Paper Review, Shovoong viewed on 2nd April 2011, on http://imgs.shvoongstatic.com/images/2011/_v_070420111027/scp.PNG">
Change is something that must continually happen within an organization for them to be successful and become complacent. Organizations must continue to evolve and promote learning throughout as a priority to everyone. A culture must be fostered that all employees buy into, such as the culture at Facebook or Google. People must want to work where they are and enjoy what they do to not resist change as it occurs. Change in organizations is inevitable and it happens whether people want it to or not. People will get hired, fired, promoted, and rewarded for different things over the course of time. These are changes that must happen to foster a reputable organization.
Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (June 2010). Managing organizational change: A philosophies of change approach. Journal of Change Management 10(2), 135–154.
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Judge Jr., W. Q. (2013, February). Focusing on Organizational Change. Retrieved November 8, 2017, from VitalSource: Retrieved from https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/#/books/MBS1549164/cfi/160!/4/4@0.00:39.5
Kotter, JP 1995, Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. In Harvard Business Review on Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Change is a fundamental element of individuals, groups and all sorts of organizations. As it is the case for individuals, groups and societies, where change is a continuous process, composed of an indefinite amount of smaller sub-changes that vary in effect and length, and is affected by all sorts of aspects and events, many of which cyclic are anticipated ones. It is also the case for organizations, where change occurs repeatedly during the life cycle of organizations. Yet change in organizations is not as anticipated nor as predictable, with unexpected internal and external variables and political forces that can further complicate the management of change (Andriopoulos, C. and P. Dawson, 2009), which is by itself, the focus of many scholars in their pursuit to shed light on and facilitate the change process (Kotter 1996; Levin 1947; et al).
Change is important to the survival of an organization and according to history there are many examples in which organizations are no longer in business due to the failure of change. In order for an organization to be successful at change, the employees must have understanding of the change because the resistance that is presented by the employees is due to the fear of the unknown. The employees’ resistance to change depends on how they comprehend it and how well they are prepared to handle it (Hamric, Spross, and Hanson, 2005).
Change may be initiated in different theories, which provide a framework to explain and guide the change process (Katz, 2007). There are two basic types of change theory, namely personal or organisational, which
Reasons for change can be down to adopting new corporate strategies, structures, process and technology to assist organisations handle internal and external environmental conditions effectively (Goksoy, 2015). However, merely adopting change cannot drastically drive through change so organisations need to go through reconstructive change to realign the organisations objectives (Green, 2007). Although change can be introduced in these drastic fashions it can also be emergent within an organisation due
...ople for stability. In this todays modernised world, change has become inevitable and there is no doubt that change has to occur in order to survive and achieve success through a number of ways such as focusing on internal strengths, exploiting external forces and making potential threats into opportunities. In the long run, there are clearly more benefits rather than disadvantages because change does not have to be met with negativity. It needs to be embraced through cooperation between managers and employees, clear organisational culture and rewards that improve performance that are not based on tightly structured procedures. Ultimately, overcoming the difficulties of organisational change shows how management systems and people rewarded for stability is not just black and white but is shades of grey and how it is approached will determine its success or failure.
If organizations are too stable and nothing changes, then the system dies; and organizational change has a failure rate of about 80% or even more' (Burnes, 2005). As Burnes (2005) puts it, change is an elusive creature. Change is difficult to initiate, cope with, and achieve but not impossible. Royal Mail is a classic case of organizational change.
Cummings, T. G. (2008). Organizational Development Diagnosis. Handbook of organization development (pp. 137-147). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
...ess of the organizations inclination to change; the staffs skills and competency; magnitude of revolution capability and decision-making strategy. This change must be pertinent to the organizations objectives and to its members; opportunities for the members of the organization to make informed and prudent choices for a prudent decision-making.
One of the first scholars to describe the process of organizational change was Lewin (1974). He described change as a three-stage process that consists of unfreezing, moving and freezing stage. During the unfreezing stage the organizations become motivated to change by some event or objective. The moving stage is like implementation when the organization actually makes the necessary change. Furthermore the freezing stage is reached when the change becomes permanent. Organizational change has also...