In order to lead and be successful you have to be willing to embrace change. Myatt (2012) explained that “leadership demands fluidity, which requires the willingness to recognize the need for change, and finally, the ability to lead change”. Change needs to be recognized in every organization. Organizations must undergo change to subsist. Each area of an organization needs to be assessed to lead change properly. Lastly, the change process must be managed. It is demanding that change agents are arranged for success and not failure by providing them with the proper tools, talent, resources, responsibility and authority necessary for the job (Myatt, 2012). Podmoroff (n.d.) describes “When you manage change effectively, you can move your organization into the new "business as usual" state swiftly, and you'll find that other people are quick to accept change”. Change management is frequently directed by a powerful change management model; this provides people with a foundation that can be used to comprehend the process and what is expected of them (Connelly, n.d.). Kurt Lewin’s theory...
A solid theoretical foundation is required to lead and manage change. For efficient and effective change to take place it must be intentional. Leadership set the tone and the direction of an organization allowing it or hindering it to change and adapt. Leader can use tactics and skills to create an organic change environment with the right change models and interventions when the organization is most ready for change.
In today’s ever changing world people must adapt to change. If an organization wants to be successful or remain successful they must embrace change. This book helps us identify why people succeed and or fail at large scale change. A lot of companies have a problem with integrating change, The Heart of Change, outlines ways a company can integrate change. The text book Ivanceich’s Organizational Behavior and Kotter and Cohen’s The Heart of Change outlines how change can be a good thing within an organization. The Heart of Change introduces its readers to eight steps the authors feel are important in introducing a large scale organizational change. Today’s organizations have to deal with leadership change, change in the economy,
Change is inevitable and bound to happen in all aspects of life including business. Although change is important in an organization, it can also be seen as a strength and weakness. Effective leadership is about mastering change. One must be willing to change in order to grow and be successful. This paper will compare and contrast Kotter and Kurt Lewin step in their change management models. Furthermore, it will elaborate on the concepts and explain whether these methods can be used at the same time. In addition, this paper will include a Christian worldview of the information discussed and how it relates to the change management models.
Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. (2010). Managing organizational change: a philosophies of change approach. Journal of Change Management, 10(2), 135-154.
To manage change and for the development of organization understanding the definition of change is very important. “Change is a very complex phenomenon involving a multiplicity of man’s motivation in both micro and macro systems and that man gets satisfied with his equilibrium and is resistant to changing his status quo.” (Lippitt,
The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used
Graetz, F., & Smith, A. C. T. (June 2010). Managing organizational change: A philosophies of change approach. Journal of Change Management 10(2), 135–154.
“Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail” is an article written by John P. Kotter in the Harvard Business Review, which outlines eight critical factors to help leaders successfully transform a business. Since leading requires the ability to influence other people to reach a goal, the leadership needs to take steps to cope with a new, more challenging global market environment. Kotter emphasizes the mistakes corporations make when implementing change and why those efforts create failure; therefore, it is essential that leaders learn to apply change effectively in order for it to be beneficial in the long-term (Kotter).
The most important factor critical to the success of organizational changes especially with mergers, reengineering, and downsizing is communication. Management must be open and changes must be communicated with everyone within an organization to avoid criticism. Communication should be well-thought out and the intended audience must be taken into separate considerations. This will lessen frustration caused by feelings of not being in control. All members in the organization would want to be a part of organizational change rather than feeling like a bystander or even worse, a victim. Other factors that can affect communication are the language used as well as the gender and emotions of the individuals as well as existing power structures.
According to Dawson (1994) organisational change therefore refers to any alteration in activities or tasks. It is a modification or transformation of the organisations structure, processes, or goals. It may involve minor changes in procedures and or operations or transformational changes brought about by rapid expansion into international markets, mergers, or major restructuring. McLagan (2002) claims that “the phenomenon of change has become a central management issue in modern organisations and whilst it has always been an issue, creating, sustaining and managing change continues to be a challenge in today’s society” (p. 28). Change is also expensive, onerous, and has an intellectually demanding effect. These effects are experienced as organisations try to implement complex, unprecedented, organisation wide proposals such as reengineering, diversity interventions, globalisation, installing quality and productivity programmes, or entering into intricate agreements, mergers and acquisitions. According to Paton and McCalman, (2001) change is therefore an inseparable part of organisations, and it will certainly “not disappear or dissipate” (p. 5). Organisations no longer have a choice: they are pressured to change or else face their possible downfall moreover the rate of organisational change is clearly accelerating today. The content of organisational change refers to the particular areas of transformation that are being examined. According to Walsham, (1993) the organisation may be seeking to change technology, products, systems, manpower, geographical positioning, or corporate culture. The process of organisational change refers to the actions, reactions, and interactions from various interested parties in an attempt to move the ...
Palmer, Ian, Richard Dunford, and Gib Akin. Managing organizational change: a multiple perspectives approach. 2nd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2009. Print.
Combinations of different experiences and education have developed a variety of assumptions about how an organisation works. The use of metaphors when describing organisation movements and change is an important way in which we express these assumptions (Cameron and Green, 2012). Gareth Morgan’s (1986) work on organizational metaphors is good for understanding the different assumptions and beliefs about change that exists. He identifies eight organizational metaphors; machines, organisms, brains, cultures, political systems, psychic prisons and flux and transformation (Morgan, 1986).
Pierce et al (2002) states that the movement by an organisation to a future and preferred state from its current state is referred to as organisational change. According to Catalyst (2012), “Organisational change refers to strategies for change management and the means by which organisations can most effectively implement and sustain efforts to create inclusive workplaces.”
The goal of organizational change management is to create a prosperous work environment through strategic change and applying those changes through the people side of management. Organizational change management is a branch of handling the outcome and strategies of new business processes, changes in organizational structure or cultural changes within a company. There are multiple components in understanding the techniques and goals of Organizational change management. The first part discussed will be on setting goals for an organization as it can be a complex process because if aimed too high, the goals will most likely not be attained and performance will deteriorate.
The idea of change is the most constant factor in business today and organisational change therefore plays a crucial role in this highly dynamic environment. It is defined as a company that is going through a transformation and is in a progressive step towards improving their existing capabilities. Organisational change is important as managers need to continue to commit and deliver today but must also think of changes that lie ahead tomorrow. This is a difficult task because management systems are design, and people are rewarded for stability. These two main factors will be discussed with reasons as to why organisational change is necessary for survival, but on the other hand why it is difficult to accomplish.