3

687 Words2 Pages

Training the Intelligence Team
At all unit levels, especially strategic, the Army requires highly trained intelligence soldiers that are knowledgeable in all intelligence disciplines. The flattened access to the Intelligence Enterprise requires all intelligence soldiers to be trained and knowledgeable on all facets of the intelligence cycle. To produce knowledgeable and well rounded intelligence soldiers, the institutional training base must reflect and provide a multi-disciplined intelligence training environment based on what works.
Leader development and soldier training have not kept pace with improvements in the ability to support the commander with intelligence. Most importantly, DCGS-A training is intelligence training and not just systems training. The DCGS-A provides an opportunity to implement and push intelligence training to a new level of situational awareness for the GCC. Individual proficiency coupled with a structured collective training plan and increased operational activity will allow the IE to develop its leaders. The development of the intelligence analyst has to stay abreast of advances in doctrine, organization, technology, to include incorporation of ground up ideas and fixes. Important to effective training and leader development is being able to leverage access to the intelligence enterprise and multi-disciplined intelligence data. By training to access the data through DCGS-A and apply it to the Military Decision Making Process (MDMP), TIG/MIBs in support of GAF and GRF can better enable situational understanding and drive military operations.
The institutional training on DCGS-A provides the foundation to improve intelligence training across the Army. The US Army Intelligence Center of Excell...

... middle of paper ...

...nd TTPs that best support the RAF, while positioning organic assets and posturing to support expeditionary operations and GRF partnerships. This will require GCCs to enforce the MIB transformation in order to meet and provide the intelligence support necessary to meet the expectations of the Army and Joint Force. As both the TIB and MIB adjust to the changes in theater and strategic support relationships, federation of intelligence resources must focus on land, sea, air, space and cyber requirements. Furthering collaboration with the GRF, advancing analytics and shared training opportunities will enable the Army’s ability to react to regionally aligned contingencies. The theater MIBs continue developing new and innovative approaches to regional aligned force integration; finding greater efficiencies in federated analytics and structured requirements management.

Open Document