Future
I believe that the majority of the problems that affect the United States today will be still be prominent problems in the future. These issues include terrorism, spying, privacy rights, and drugs and gangs. Even though these issues are at their prime now, I think they will be less burdensome, yet still a concern to the CIA and our government. Acts, drones, the national watch list.
The United States (U.S.) Congress is responsible for the management and oversight of all U.S. intelligence agencies. The U.S. Congress authorizes funds for intelligence programs (Rosenbach and Paritz¬¬, “Confrontation or Collaboration” 18). As of today, the two congressional committees responsible for intelligence oversight are the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI). The congressional committees were first established in the 1970s. Although the intelligence committees are in direct support of the intelligence communities, there have been controversies and confrontation between the two. These confrontations have affected the relationship between the two entities. From World War II (WWII) to the end of the Cold War, intelligence flaws contributed to reforms being implemented, however not all of the reforms worked. Reforms seldomly assist and most of them were disregarded. The reforms implemented, contributed significantly to the intelligence community. These reforms have shaped how the intelligence community conduct intelligence activities and contributes significantly to the policy and guidance for intelligence activities. By understanding the policy and procedures and how they came about in the intelligence community, individuals will be able to identify the important role intelligence plays in national security.
Strategic Intelligence is a critical instrument that law makers utilize to help make assessments on U.S. national/international policies. Congress proper role in Strategic Intelligence should be the following: budget management, overseeing the strategic intelligence activities and ensuring laws are being followed to protect the people of the United States. Congress depends on the Intelligence Community, for information and support. While the Intelligence agencies depends on Congress for adequate funding for their missions, projects, programs, and research.
In 1949 the Central Intelligence Act was passed. This new act ensured that the CIA would not be obligated to disclose the names and number of personnel employed nor their functions, official titles or salaries. In addition, the CIA director wo...
The United States had a birth unlike many other countries. Born of a revolution based on the values of a representative government, the United States would grow into a global superpower that is currently unrivaled. Because of its current position, the story of how the United States wrestled thirteen colonies away from Great Britain remains quite popular, both in our culture and on college campuses. The colonies defeated a better trained, better funded, professional army that was forging a global empire. Home-field advantage, the surprisingly potent Continental Army, and aid from the French are all widely noted as the tools of American victory. Yet, the above explanation is failing to mention the myriad of things that allowed for the Continental Army to be a strong fighting force. Many things contribute to victory and defeat in war, but one that has stood the test of time will endear itself to all commanders—intelligence.
In the wake of the assaults of September 11, 2001, the counterintelligence group has started to advance from a confederation to a bound together venture equipped to apply the full run of counterintelligence capacities as a powerful influence for national issues. The Counterintelligence Enhancement Act of 2002, and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 quickened this advancement and charged the National Counterintelligence Executive (NCIX) with handling this National Counterintelligence Strategy and giving the President writes about its execution. (Hood, 26-29)
Jones, J. B. (2011). THE NECESSITY OF FEDERAL INTELLIGENCE SHARING WITH SUB-FEDERAL AGENCIES. Texas Review of Law & Politics, 16(1), 175-210. Retrieved from Academic Search Complete database.
As mentioned before, it seems that intelligence and policy cannot live with and without each other (Betts, 2002). The intelligence community and policymakers need to ...
The NSA can capture more than 1 Yottabyte of data each day, but what is the NSA to start and is it abusing its power? NSA stands for National security agency, it works with the united stated government to prevent individuals from developing terrorist activity. To prevent activities such as terrorism, the NSA intercepts communications between people online which is good, but not all interceptions are illegal activates because the NSA can also intercept individuals that have no criminal background. The thing that troubles me with this type of problem is that the NSA can abuse this type of power because it needs court approvals to intercept online activity, but it doesn’t always ask for permission. Actions by the NSA can be characterized by monitoring the citizens on the internet with both legal and illegal power including fighting organizations against them.
The following open source, previously classified US government documents serve as primary evidence for this essay. A deterrence strategy is the main defense to reduce risk. Lampel and Shapira remark “…a rational actor will also practice vigilance”, or the monitoring (intelligence) of others to reduce risk “…to prevent strategic surprises before they happen” (Lampel and Shapira 2001, 599). Intelligence agencies’ strive to maintain objectivity, and knowledge of policymaker’s goals, to effectively, and clearly communicate threat estimation. Among other reasons, Lowenthal emphasizes avoiding strategic surprise is a primary reason intelligence agencies exist (Lowenthal 2012, 2). For good reason, as many modern-day examples typify the close relationship between strategic surprise and war. As Trubowitz (2012) describes war as “…the most lethal or destructive of foreign police tools…” (Trubowitz 2012, 10), and serves as a revisionist actors preferred strategy. The subsequent section examines primary, open source CIA ORE, NSA, and NSC-68 documents.