Empiricism and Rationalism

1014 Words3 Pages

Philosophy uses a term for empirical knowledge, “posteriori”, meaning that knowledge is “dependent upon sense experience”. (Markie, 2008, section 1.2) Yet, philosophical empiricism is defined in such an absolute way; which causes philosophical empiricism to be an inaccurate philosophical position from which to address all aspects of human life. Philosophical empiricism is defined as “the belief that all human knowledge arises from sense experience.” (Nash, 1999, page 254) Yet, medical empiricism is so far to the other extreme as to be insulting, while this empiricism is still said to be based on all sensory experience; only the scientific sensory experience is valued and counted. This form of empiricism excludes the experience of non-scientific persons. This is just one manner in which empiricism has “proved inadequate to explain many important human ideas”. (Nash, 1999, page 254) I believe that human truth is in a combination of empiricism and rationalism. Although, sensory data can inform us of the external world; yet, reason gives humanity access to equally important intangibles.

For an example, I have a twenty two year old son who was diagnosed with autism at four years of age; I would tell the physicians about my son and his behaviors, and they would dismiss the data as non-scientific empirical data. In example, I informed a physician of the type of reactions that my son had to certain foods; and requested an allergy test. After the test results came back, the physician stated that my son did not have an allergy even though he was having a food sensitivity type of reaction. The physician stated that non-scientific empirical data could not be used in treating my son, the criteria for determining allergies must appe...

... middle of paper ...

...pedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Section 1.2, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Retrieved February 11, 2011, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/rationalism-empiricism/

Nash, Ronald H., (1999). Life‘s ultimate questions: an introduction to philosophy, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49530.

Nash, Ronald H., (1999). Life‘s ultimate questions: an introduction to philosophy, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49530, page 257, note 13 quoting Hume’s Natural History of Religion in The Philosophical Works of David Hume (London, 1874-1875), 4, 309.

Nash, Ronald H., (1999). Life‘s ultimate questions: an introduction to philosophy, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49530, page 284, quoting Arthur Holmes, “ The Justification of World View Beliefs”

The Nations Bible Society, (1995), The Holy Bible: God’s Word version, Cleveland, Ohio 44130-0699

Show More
Related

  • Milgram and Zimbardo: Overpowering Situations

    1031 Words  | 3 Pages

    SALAMUCHA, AGNIESZKA. Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy, Spring2009, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p166-168, 3p

    Read More

  • What Is John Locke's Rationalism

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    John Locke (b.1632,d. 1704) was an influential British philosopher and political theorist whose philosophies and theories continue to inspire. He is often viewed as the founder of British Empiricism and one of the foundational influences of modern, liberal governments.

    Read More

  • Rationalism vs. Empiricism

    1587 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rationalism and empiricism were two philosophical schools in the 17th and 18th centuries, that were expressing opposite views on some subjects, including knowledge. While the debate between the rationalist and empiricist schools did not have any relationship to the study of psychology at the time, it has contributed greatly to facilitating the possibility of establishing the discipline of Psychology. This essay will describe the empiricist and rationalist debate, and will relate this debate to the history of psychology.

    Read More

  • Nietzsche's Argument For The Pursuit Of Knowledge

    397 Words  | 1 Pages

    Rationalism asserts truth can be known prior to experience, or a priori—only through reason. Empiricism asserts that all concepts and knowledge come a posteriori—from sense perception. Plato asserted that all knowledge is a priori, that knowledge is not possible based on anything coming from the senses. Things that come by way of sense perception are part of the world of becoming, and therefore, nothing can manifest from them other than mere opinion. True knowledge can only be gained from those things that are permanent, changeless, and eternal. Because we can only access knowledge through reason, for the pursuit of knowledge sense perception is irrelevant, and things learned through sense perception cannot properly be considered knowledge.

    Read More

  • What Are A Father's Rights Concerning an Abortion

    1066 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ernational Journal Of Applied Philosophy 21.1 (2007): 1-24. Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Feb. 2014.

    Read More

  • Essay On Ethical Way Of Knowing

    782 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Empirical way relates to the science of nursing that uses laws and theories to predict the outcome (Carper, n.d.). A simple example of this occurred when caring for a patient with an edematous, painful left lower extremity that was warm with erythema noted from mid-calf down to the ankle. To predict the care and possible outcome, the nurse uses the knowledge of science to determine possible testing and causes for these symptoms. A notification to the physician is made and an ultrasound of the left lower leg is ordered. The results of the ultrasound indicate a deep vein thrombosis and the patient

    Read More

  • The Ethics of Ambiguity

    1534 Words  | 4 Pages

    Wittgenstein, Ludwig; G. E. M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte (eds. and trans.). Philosophical Investigations. 4th edition, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. Print.

    Read More

  • Teleological Argument From Design

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    Contrasting to this we will explore the critical discussion of the argument from design found in David Hume’s (Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion).

    Read More

  • Comparing Knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy and Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning

    860 Words  | 2 Pages

    Rationalists would claim that knowledge comes from reason or ideas, while empiricists would answer that knowledge is derived from the senses or impressions. The difference between these two philosophical schools of thought, with respect to the distinction between ideas and impressions, can be examined in order to determine how these schools determine the source of knowledge. The distinguishing factor that determines the perspective on the foundation of knowledge is the concept of the divine.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of David Hume's Dialogues Of Natural Religion

    1190 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Part II of David Hume’s Dialogues of Natural Religion, Demea remarks that the debate is not about whether or not God exists, but what the essence of God is. (pg.51) Despite this conclusion in Part II, in his introduction to the Dialogues Martin Bell remarks that the question of why something operates the way it does is quite different from the question why do people believe that it operates the way it does. (pg. 11) This question, the question of where a belief originates and is it a valid argument, is much of the debate between Hume’s three characters in the Dialogues. (pg. ***)

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Philo, Demea And Cleanthes

    1331 Words  | 3 Pages

    Scottish philosopher David Hume wrote one of his famous writings, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, in 1779, which is a conversation between three individuals discussing religion and the various aspects surrounding it. The three members of the dialogue are Philo, Demea, and Cleanthes. Demea represents fideism, which means that he believes that one has to rely on faith, not reason. Philo represents skepticism and is the individual whose ideas are closest to Hume’s own personal views on religion. Cleanthes represents theological rationalism, which is the belief that one can learn about God through evidence in nature. A major topic of discussion in Hume’s Dialogues between Philo, Demea, and Cleanthes is the argument from design.

    Read More

  • Interpretive Richness of Leslie Marmon Silko's Ceremony

    1749 Words  | 4 Pages

    worldview on the grounds that “[...] western presumptions must be set aside so that they do not

    Read More

  • SELLARS AND THE "MYTH OF THE GIVEN"

    8691 Words  | 18 Pages

    Since the body of the paper will be distinctly critical, I would like to begin by paying tribute to Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind (EPM) as one of the seminal works of twentieth century philosophy. I still remember the growing excitement with which I read it when it first came out in Volume I of the Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (1956), in the Detroit Airport, of all places. (My colleague, Tamar Gendler, remarked to me that I was probably the only person there reading Wilfrid Sellars, the others, no doubt, reading best sellers.) Over the ensuing decades the excitement, though never wholly extinguished, has been adulterated by numerous second thoughts, some of which will be expounded here.

    Read More

  • Bertrand Russell and Saint Thomas Aquinas’s Arguments on God's Existence

    595 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the above essay, I analyzed Aquinas’s efficient cause argument and presented Russell’s objections to some of the claims that Aquinas made. I then showed how Russell’s objection failed based mainly on the fact that the first cause is something that is unchanging. This, in turn, supported Aquinas’s argument for the existence of God.

    Read More

  • The Compatibility of Faith and Reason

    1234 Words  | 3 Pages

    Barbour, Ian G. Religion in an Age of Science. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1990. Print. (BL 240.2 .B368 1990)

    Read More

More about Empiricism and Rationalism

Open Document