Normally, punishment is primarily used to correct individual behavior, but as it has been already stated, there are some lasting organizational effects. These effects can be positive or negative which largely depend on other factors, such as whether the organization has a positive or negative culture, punishment policies, and the trust factor within the organization. A study was done in 2013 by Danny Wang, Flora Gu, and Maggie Dong for the Journal of Marketing Research. The study was to measure the effects of punishment in a distribution network. This study was especially interesting because unlike the aforementioned studies, this one was in relation to a business model instead of whole societies (Dong, Gu, & Wang, 2013). The results of …show more content…
I felt during work that I just didn’t care no more. I didn’t care if I broke something. I didn’t care about anything. I just wanted to get through the day.” [until I could quit.] Another employee was told that her performance was below standard and she would not be getting an annual increase. When asked if her behavior changed she reported: “Yes, my behavior changed. I became very bitter because I felt I was treated unfairly. The negative outcome was that I did not want to work as hard for that person.” (p. …show more content…
Establishing normative procedures and rules to outline acceptable and unacceptable behavior is a key factor in preventing employee deviance (Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, 2011). Monitoring systems are commonly used to detect and prevent employee deviance. Furthermore, once they detect a problem, acting upon the offenders sends a message that monitoring is happening, and deviance will likely result in corrective action (Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, 2011). The effectiveness of these monitoring systems is proportional to the effectiveness of the subsequent punishments that are enacted on the offender. In other words, if the punishment is ineffective, then the monitoring system will also be rendered ineffective (Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, 2011). Therefore, when an employee is caught breaking company policy, it is imperative that the manager uses a fair policy of correcting the problem while sending a clear message that employee deviance will have consequences (Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, 2011). The perception of whether a punishment is considered fair or unfair is known as procedural justice (PJ) (Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, 2011). To achieve a high level of procedural justice, there must be a balance of monitoring and punishment. With too little monitoring, and heavy
The Punishment Imperative, a book based on the transition from a time when punishment was thought to be necessarily harsh to a time where reform in the prion system is needed, explains the reasons why the grand social experiment of severe punishment did not work. The authors of the book, Todd R. Clear and Natasha A. Frost, strongly argue that the previous mindset of harsh punishment has been replaced due to political shifts, firsthand evidence, and spending issues within the government. Clear and Frost successfully assert their argument throughout the book using quantitative and qualitative information spanning from government policies to the reintegration of previous convicts into society.
What would the criminal justice system be without punishment? Perhaps, the criminal justice system would not serve a function or cease to exist. Punishment is one of the main facets of the criminal justice system. It holds such significance that it even reflects the beliefs and values of a particular society. Fyodor Dostoyevsky (1821-1881) once said “The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons.” (Pollock, 2010: 315). Punishment has been around since the beginning of civilization. With its rich history, the concept of punishment has been analyzed by some of the most renowned theorists, some of which include Jeremy Bentham, Cesare Beccaria, Adolphe Quetelet and André-Michel Guerry (Pollock, 2010: 318). Once found guilty of an offense the type of punishment must be determined. There are many different rationales used to answer why it is necessary to inflict punishment. Rationales for punishment include retribution, prevention, treatment and rehabilitation. To better understand these rationales ethical systems such as utilitarianism, ethical formalism and ethics of care can be used. The general public should be knowledgeable about punishment, even more so should professionals in the criminal justice field because they are directly linked to it in some way.
In a quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of incarceration of individuals in preventing crime and especially preventing those particular individuals from repeating crime, Peter Wood concluded that several different mechanisms may in fact contribute to recidivism. Wood acknowledges the work of others in the field that have noted that statistically the experience of being incarcerated increased the likelihood that an individual will commit future criminal behavior. He continues to note the hypotheses of other researchers that such counter-intuitive statistics could be explained by "a theory of defiance" whereby after an individual receives punishment that they feel is unjust or unfair they begin to develop a sense of defiance against the system which later can turn into criminal behavior. A similar explanation is discussed, that of the development of the "gambler's fallacy" where the individual feels that being caught for the crime is a statistical oddity and that since they were recently caught they can safely continue with the crime without worry of being caught within a period of time thereafter. These previous two explanations can be directly tied to the manner in which the legal system operates as an agency of control, most notably the latter explanation; however, Wood does not discuss in depth the sociological aspects of these hypothesis.
The theory of punishment as a whole is worth investigating as well. My largest argument against the theory of punishment is that it is not a fair or just operation. The concept of punishment is a way to intentionally harm people. This is not a just way of making a case right, or making a victim heal from any crime they may have been a part of. The victim is not compensated for the damage or harm caused to them. Punishment, in the retributive theory will really only do good in that it deters people from committing crime because they are scared of the punishment- but this simply does not work as well as it should. The restitution theory does not address the issue of who is entitled to cause harm to others, or punish said criminals.
Societies have since time immemorial had to deal with wayward individuals who committed various offenses that harms the well-being of other members of the society. Within each community, there are good people and there are bad people. To promote positive overall wellbeing of the community, it is important that individuals of that particular community have systems and mechanisms in place to help deal with those who offend others and deter them from committing further offenses. Traditionally, the most common way to deal with such offenders and deter any more crime was punishment. Depending with the type of crime that an individual has committed, appropriate punishment would be meted out to them so as to make them regret their actions, deter them from committing such crimes again, and set an example to other members of the community who may think of involving themselves
Not only do inmates lose their freedom; they also lose their independence, self-worth, identity, recreational outlets and above all else their privacy. What people in general fail to realize is that everything that we have and that is around us take for granted. Anything and everything can easily be taken away from us, which is how prison security trumps everyday activities, leading all inmates into questioning their personhood. Not only are prisoners stripped of their status to call themselves human beings, prisoners also have to conform to a new type of community, and if you do not do it, you will become a victim.
For example, disciplinary punishment is used for reviewing our own actions by committing to personal change and training According to Foucault (1995), “The mechanics of training are to punish. Punish is to exercise because it produces a change and corrects an error” (180). The disciplinary power created a mechanism of control in institutions and can punish and reward in hierarchies. The penalties are used to normalize the behavior. For example, in school’s children are rewarded for their hard work and are disciplined. They are penalties when children do not do their homework. The students are able to learn from the penalties by completing all tasks on
Punishment may be used in lieu of many things. Usually when a punishment is given it is because an individual has violated a rule or law by not following the commands in which were put into place. According to The Free Dictionary, “Punishment is a penalty imposed for wrongdoing.” (thefreedictionary.com). If a child has committed an act that was disapproved by that child’s parent, their punishment may mean an early bedtime, no television, or not being able to go out to play. An adult, in their place of employment, may receive punishment a little differently. A punishment may be given if the individual violates company policies or procedure. The punishment may involve disciplinary action that may consist of a written warning, suspension, or even termination. When dealing with criminals, or alleged offenders, a punishment is given as a form of justice. The punishment may include a fine, penalty, or confinement. The punishment is usually given to fit the crime that was committed. If one has committed a crime, the result(s) of their punishment are endless.
Sigmund Freud known to be the father of Psychoanalysis , contributed a large deal of this research on the construct of the unconscious mind. Freud valued the effect that the id, ego and superego had on a pe...
Herbert Morris and Jean Hampton both view punishment as important to a healthy society. However, their views on what kind of role does punishment plays in a healthy society are vastly different. Morris believes that when one commits a crime they “owe a debt to the society and the person they wronged” and, therefore the punishment of that person is retributive, and a right for those who committed this wrong (270). Hampton, on the other hand, believes that punishment is a good for those who have strayed in the path of being morally right. Out of the two views presented, I believe that Hampton view is more plausible, and rightly places punishment as a constructive good that is better suited for society than Morris’s view.
Training police to enact broken-windows or zero-tolerance policies upon youths, who have, more than likely, only experienced areas of high-crime throughout their lives, is not the way to stop them from committing crime in their lifetime. These types of police tactics, when administered to juveniles, are more likely to skew the child’s view of themselves and their self-worth, serving to create, not only a distrust towards authority figures, but also a person who genuinely believes that they are destined to nothing more than a life of crime. Perhaps if officers were more lenient with inner-city youths, they would be more likely to see police as helpful and more likely to realize that the decisions that they make do have an effect on the outcome
There are many explanations for what punishment characterises. For Emile Durkheim, punishment was mainly an expression of social solidarity and not a form of crime control. Here, the offender attacks the social moral order by committing a crime and therefore, has to be punished, to show that this moral order still "works". Durkheim's theory suggests that punishment must be visible to everyone, and so expresses the outrage of all members of society against the challenge to their collective values. The form of punishment changes between mechanic (torture, execution) and organic (prison) solidarity because the values of society change but the idea behind punishing, the essence, stays the same - keeping the moral order intact not decreasing crime. Foucault has a different view of the role or function of punishment. For Foucault, punishment signifies political control. His theory compares the age of torture with the age of prison, concluding that the shift from the former to the latter is done due to changes in society and new strategies needed for the dominance of it by the rulers. Punishment for Foucault is a show of power first brutal and direct (torture), then organised and rational (prison). Punishment does not get more lenient because of humanitarian reasons but because the power relations in society change.
According to David Garland, punishment is a legal process where violators of the criminal law are condemned and sanctioned with specified legal categories and procedures (Garland, 1990). There are different forms and types of punishment administered for various reasons and can either be a temporary or lifelong type of punishment. Punishment can be originated as a cause from parents or teachers with misbehaving children, in the workplace or from the judicial system in which crimes are committed against the law. The main aim of punishment is to demonstrate to the public, the victim and the offender that justice is to be done, to reduce criminal activities and to deter people from wanting to commit any form of crime against the law. In other words it is a tool used to eliminate the bad in society or to deter people from committing criminal activities.
they? - do two wrongs make a right?) but why is it so important that
According to Parenting Without Punishment: A Humanist Perspective part one written by Leaon F Seltzer discusses the scientific evidence against disciplining a child physically is indisputable. In others words, corporal punishment in a child development can affect the child’s growth. Not only is beating a helpless, dependent child morally questionable, it is also repeatedly been shown to be counter-productive. However, corporal punishment leads the child to do the wrong things because its showing harmful to the child’s sense of self and can damage its inflicts on the child. In addition to that, resent surveys were given to many parents about corporal punishment and two thirds of the parents responded saying, they approve on those actions. Also,