The Battle of Leuctra, one of the most influential and significant battles in ancient Greek history, occurred during the summer of 371 BC. This battle not only influenced Greece for many years to come but also eastern European history in the fourth century BC. Prior to Leuctra, the city-state of Sparta was the most dominant and powerful force in the Peloponnese and the rest of Greece. However, as a result of the conflict, the course of history would change forever. Sparta’s defeat at the Battle of Leuctra ended its power in Greece because as a result of the loss, its military, political, and social dominance was shattered forever and was never recovered for the rest of its history leading to its new position as a second-rate power among the Greek city-states.
Sparta’s military dominance was shattered after the Battle of Leuctra as a result of it losing many Spartiatai in the battle, significantly weakening its military strength. One of the reasons that this was important triumph for the Thebans was that Sparta’s force of Spartiatai, its full citizen soldiers, was declining at an alarming rate. The city was only able to send seven hundred full citizen troops to the conflict; in the aftermath of the battle, less than half returned, bringing the total manpower below one thousand (Strassler, 362). Another important reason is that the shattering of Sparta’s aura of military invincibility caused the oppressed revolt against Spartan rule and help end its dominance in the region (Strassler, 258).As a result of all this, the city was invaded for the first time in 370 BC when the Thebans and her allies decided to invade Laconia as a result of the apparent vulnerability of Sparta.
The fighting tactics of Sparta were being successfully cou...
... middle of paper ...
...ttle led Sparta to being reduced to just a local power that would never play an important role in Greek affairs. This moment in time in history is of great importance and needs to be understood and appreciated in order understand the history that followed the battle.
Works Cited
Campbell, J.B., and Tritle, Lawrence A. THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF WARFARE IN THE CLASSICAL WORLD. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. Print
Cawkwell, G.L. “The Decline of Sparta.” The Classical Quarterly 33 (1983): 385-400. jstor.org. Web. 15 May 2014.
Devine, A.M. “A Study in Tactical Terminology.” Phoenix 37 (1983): 201-217. jstor.org. Web 15 May 2014.
Hornblower, S. “When Was Megalopolis Founded?” The Annual of the British School at Athens 85 (1990): 71-77. jstor.org. Web. 15 May 2014.
Strassler, Robert B. THE LANDMARK XENOPHON’S HELLENIKA. New York: Anchor Books, 2009. Print
Tyrtaeus poetry was designed to inspire the warriors as they went to fight for their beloved country. This work was a testament to the glory that awaited all either in life or death when they fought valiantly through the battles. He could be compared to the modern day motivational speaker. The goal was to get the guys rallied up and ready to defend their heritage. Based on the text, there is an understanding that ancient Sparta valued the heroic qualities of war. To be killed in battle was an honor. “His shining glory is never forgotten” claimed Tyrtaeus. To come home valiantly meant that all would behol...
Cameron, R. S. (2003). The army vision: The 4th AD in world war II. Military Review, 83(6), 59-68
Military History: The Definitive Visual Guide to the Objects of Warfare. New York: DK Publishing, Inc., 2012. Print.
Throughout the Ancient Greek world, there have been many wars and standoffs. However, there has been only one which changed the course of Greek history forever; the Peloponnesian War. Caused by the growing tension between Athens and Sparta, it came and left, leaving only destruction in its wake. The defeat of Athens in the Peloponnesian War caused the downfall of Greece, and the end of the Classical Age.
There is a lack of first-hand accounts of the Battle of Leuctra. Most modern scholars base their analysis on known tactics, archeological evidence, and information provided by ancient historians who wrote about the battle. While a number of ancient historians and philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, and Thucydides documented various aspects of Sparta, most modern historians rely on the writings of Xenophon and Plutarch when addressing the Battle of Leuctra. Both Xenophon and Plutarch provided similar accounts of the battle; however, there are discrepancies such as the total number of forces on each side. Due to the likelihood these ancient historians had personal biases, and given that neither had first-hand accounts of the battle, I
The causes of the Peloponnesian War proved to be too great between the tension-filled stubborn Greek city-states of Athens and Sparta. As Thucydides says in Karl Walling’s article, “Never had so many human beings been exiled, or so much human blood been shed” (4). The three phases of the war, which again, are the Archidamian war, the Sicilian Expedition and the Decelean war, show the events that followed the causes of the war, while also showing the forthcoming detrimental effects that eventually consumed both Athens and eventually Sparta effectively reshaping Greece.
The Peloponnesian War is the conflict between the pelopoponesians league led by Sparta and the Delian league, led by Athens. Much of our knowledge on the causes and events of the Peloponnesian War, depends on the Athenian Thucydides 460-400 BC, writer of the History of the Peloponessian War. He servd as an Athenian commander in Northern Greece during the early years of the war until the assembly exiled him as he lost an outpost to the enemy. During this exile, he was able to interview witnesses on both sides of the conflicted. Unlike Heredotus he concentrated on contemporary history and presented his account of the war in an annalistic framework that only occasionally diverts from chronological order. In his account, he discuses the precursors to the war, including the 30 years truce and revolutions, such as the stasis in Corcyra. When looking at wars, the primary focus is normally the fighting itself, such as what we see for World War II. However, it is important to look at the anatomy of war, meaning what effect the war has on the people who are experiencing it first hand, and the consquences that the conflict has on the rest of the world. Therefore in this essay I shall discuss, drawing directly from Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War, how the civilians reacted to the war, their involvement and socio economic factors. Furthermore, the first section of my essay shall focus on the direct effect of war on the people, regarding the plague, and violence and hopelessness that was experienced. Then I shall go on to discuss more general effects of the war and how it affected the Greek world, discussing the social and economic losses that occurred such as the cost of the war in attica, the coup d’etat that occurred in gove...
Athens and Sparta were both city-states in Classical Greece. While Athens embraced democracy, Sparta was a dictatorial fierce warrior state. Sparta was a militaristic community, Athens was a freethinking, and commerce minded city-state. Modern societies have modeled their government organizational structure and military discipline practices from lessons learned of these ancient city-states. There is much is to be praised regarding Classical Greece for their courage, their progressive thinking and the birth of democracy. However, I think it is important to remember that in both cases, Athens and Sparta were able to sustain their lifestyle on the backs of countless slaves, non-citizens and women and that there is a darker and less romantic side to the past.
Helots were the original residents of the Laconian plain, the term Helots often means ‘prisoner of war’ and that is a good representation of what the Helots were, prisoners or slaves. Owned as property of the state they were assigned land that was owned by individual Spartans, they worked, lived on and made profit from the agricultural products derived from the land though a half of any harvest was directly given to the landowner. The helots produced all the food for the population of Sparta and worked incessantly to maintain the spartiate’s lifestyles, Tyrtaeus compared the helots to ‘Asses exhausted under great loads: Under painful necessity to bring their masters full half the fruit their ploughed land produced’. The tasks of the helots were generally agricultural though, when the Spartans w...
Dating back to 449 B.C., Sparta and Athens always had an alliance, but as time grew that balance slowly began to fall as one felt threatened by another. Before any sight of unsteadiness the Spartans and Athenians had a bound partnership. Beginning after their domination of the Persian war, the two states slowly became aware of one another’s growing power. More time went by, and the Spartans began to grow conscious of the other states, feeling wary and paranoid around them (Fox, 170). No state was particularly to blame for the strain on their peace treaty, nor for the war, it came as the two states developed. Eventually the two states had clashed enough and declared war. Although the Spartans gave the Athenians a chance to back down and temporarily stall war, the two states would never be equal, their allies resented one another far too much. The growing urge for power was bound to take over sooner or later. Finally, after 7 years of uneasy tension, Sparta could wait no longer and declared war against Athens (Fox, 167). Although the Athenians and Spartans lived together in peace for so long, they existed in a fragile balance that was bound to eventually lead to war.
Farris, Dale. "Shutt, Timothy B.: A History of Ancient Sparta." Library Journal 15 May 2009: 45.
The development of an empire is a change strongly emphasized in the Archeology as a radical departure from the Hellenic tradition, and consequently a major source of conflict among the Greeks. Prior to the adven...
Kaltsas, Nikos E. Athens-Sparta. New York, NY: Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation (USA) in Collaboration with the National Archaeological Museum, Athens, 2006. Print.
Williams, John. "Chapter 8." World Atlas of Weapons & War. London: Aldus, 1976. 96-111. Print.
In the year approximately 500 B.C., the Greek civilization came upon a time of peace. Because of the tranquil times, the civilization’s society had more time to focus on writing, math, astronomy, and artistic fields, as well as trade and metallurgy. Out of all the city-states of Greece, two excelled over all the rest, Sparta and Athens. Even though they were the most advanced and strong civilizations, they were bitter enemies. While Athens focused mainly on the people’s democracy and citizen rights, Sparta were ferocious and enslaved its original inhabitants, making them unable to leave