Hamlet Allusion Analysis

1272 Words3 Pages

During the late sixteenth century, the Renaissance movement was in full swing with many scholars, musicians, and artists studying the classical period. Many European scholars looked to the Greeks and Romans for inspiration. A lot of famous works from the Renaissance were inspired by Greek and Roman art. Shakespeare was no exception; he embedded a lot of classical references into most of his plays. In fact, Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar was just a reenactment of Julius Caesar’s death. In Hamlet however, Shakespeare’s classical allusions have a deeper meaning in the play than just going along with the trend of the time. Shakespeare cleverly embedded classical allusions in the play as a tool to show us Hamlet’s opinion of other characters during …show more content…

After the King and Queen left the room, Hamlet states that his father was “So excellent a king, that was to this Hyperion to a satyr” (Hamlet, 1. 2. 139-140). Hamlet is basically saying that his father was an awesome and way better king than Claudius. The comparison makes sense since a satyr was known as the epitome of animal lust and carnal passion (Allingham). He is taking multiple jabs at his uncle Claudius in this statement alone. He first elevated his father to the level of a deity by comparing him to Hyperion. Then he lowered Claudius to the level of a lustful animal with carnal passion. This is referring to the relationship between Claudius and Gertrude, which he sees as incestuous and vile. Hamlet later says, “Frailty, thy name is woman A little month, or ere those shoes were old With which she followed my poor father’s body Like Niobe, all tears, why she, even she O God, a beast that wants discourse of reason Would have mourned longer married with my uncle” (Hamlet, 1. 2. 146-151). The allusion of Niobe refers to a woman who was turned to stone after a fit of weeping …show more content…

The key moment in the play is when the actor says, “On Mar’s armor, forged for proof eterne, with less remorse than Pyrrhus’ bleeding sword now falls on Priam” (Hamlet 2. 2. 430-433). Although this is somewhat confusing because Hamlet could be identifying himself with Pyrrhus the avenger or he could be identifying the victim, with his father and the killer with Claudius (Allingham). Later on, Hamlet intentionally tells the actors to skip to the line “come to Hecuba” (Hamlet 2. 2. 440). This shows how Hamlet is trying to compare the emotions of Hecuba queen of Troy to Gertrude’s emotions even though unlike the story, Gertrude didn’t witness her husband’s death (Allingham). The actor gives us vivid imagery when he says “When she saw Pyrrhus make malicious sport in mincing with his sword her husband’s libs, the instant burst of clamor that she made, Unless things mortal move them all, would have made milch the burning eyes of heaven, and passion in the gods” (Hamlet 2. 2. 452-457). Hamlet is showing how Hecuba’s grief was so great it would have made the gods in Olympus cry while Gertrude has no tears left for Hamlet’s father. Hamlet seems to be making a point that Gertrude should be more emotionally moved by his father’s death and

Open Document