Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and Disadvantages of eugenics
Eugenics and its impact
Eugenics and its impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages and Disadvantages of eugenics
Introduction Eugenics is defined as “a science that deals with the improvement (as by control of human mating) of hereditary qualities of a race or breed (1).” The principles of eugenics have been used in many different countries for various reasons. In the United States, eugenics reached its peak in the pre-World War II period. It was believed that the most efficient way to deal with social problems, such as mental illness, poverty and crime, was to inhibit reproduction among people with such characteristics. Involuntary sterilization laws were enacted in many states. The United Kingdom’s government Mental Deficiency Committee stated in a report that “birth control was the best method to eliminate the hoards (sic) of weak, unhealthy, and tainted poor children whose dependence on tax-supported welfare programs prevented the overburdened middle classes from producing more children of good quality (1).” The goals of the eugenics movement were “the 'improvement of the human stock' and the avoidance of financial drain on society (1).” Supporters argued that people could be enhanced, and thus 'improved', by genetic treatments and manipulation. They maintained that if they could select children that were not disadvantaged, then they should. Nazi Germany established numerous strong racial laws in 1933. The Nazi Hereditary Health Court was formed and approved many eugenics proposals. These became increasingly inhumane as time progressed. Therefore, euthanasia of the insane, mentally deficient, as well as others judged to be undesirable began. After the Nazis labeled these atrocities as “eugenics,” the word became associated with evil or discrimination and has been mostly replaced by more friendly terms, such as “counseling in human gen... ... middle of paper ... ...y. Reproductive BioMedicine. 19, 23-33 (2009). 16. Isabel A. Karpin, Choosing disability: preimplantation genetic diagnosis and negative enhancement. Journal of Law and Medicine. 15, 89-103 (2007). 17. Rachel Iredale, Marcus Longley, Christian Thomas, Anita Shaw, What choices should we be able to make about designer babies? A citizens’ jury of young people in South Wales. Health Expectations. 9, 207–217 (2006). 18. T. Bogdanoski, Every body is different: regulating the use (and non-use) of cosmetic surgery, body modification and reproductive genetic testing. Griffith Law Review. 2, 503-528 (2009). 19. Merryn Ekberg, Maximizing the benefits and minimizing the risks associated with prenatal genetic testing. Health, Risk & Society. 1, 67 – 81 (2007). 20. Stephen Quake, Opening the Pandora’s box of prenatal genetic testing. Nature Medicine. 17, 250-251 (2011).
The eugenics movement started in the early 1900s and was adopted by doctors and the general public during the 1920s. The movement aimed to create a better society through the monitoring of genetic traits through selective heredity. Over time, eugenics took on two different views. Supporters of positive eugenics believed in promoting childbearing by a class who was “genetically superior.” On the contrary, proponents of negative eugenics tried to monitor society’s flaws through the sterilization of the “inferior.”
Eugenics, the set of beliefs and practices which aim at improving the genetic quality of the human population played a significant role in the history and culture of United States prior to its involvement in World War Two. (Wiki) Gilman is the writer of late 19th and early 20th century and during this century which is known as progressive era, Eugenics was considered a method of preserving and improving the dominant groups in the population. The idea of Eugenics was brought up by Sir Francis Galton in America. They think that by the idea of eugenics there will be a development in a society. America also made American Breeder’s Association which later on founded the Eugenics Record office, and with certain mission and, in their mission statement, they wrote: Society must protect itself; as it claims the right to deprive the murder of his life so it may also annihilate the hideous serpent of hopelessly vicious protoplasm. Here is where appropriate legislation will aid in eugenics and creating a healthier, saner society in the
The history of harmful eugenic practices, spurring from the Nazi implementations of discrimination towards biologically inferior people has given eugenics a negative stigma (1,Kitcher, 190). Genetic testing, as Kitcher sees it through a minimalistic perspective, should be restrained to aiding future children with extremely low qualities of life (2,Kitcher, 190). He believes that genetic engineering should only be used to avoid disease and illness serving the role of creating a healthier human race. He promotes laissez-faire eugenics, a “hands off” concept that corresponds to three components of eugenic practice, discrimination, coercion and division of traits. It holds the underlying works of genetic testing, accurate information, open access, and freedom of choice. Laissez-faire eugenics promises to enhance reproductive freedom preventing early child death due to genetic disease (3,Kitcher, 198). However there are dangers in Laissez-faire that Kitcher wants to avoid. The first is the historical tendency of population control, eugenics can go from avoiding suffering, to catering to a set of social values that will cause the practice of genetics to become prejudiced, insensitive and superficial. The second is that prenatal testing will become limited to the upper class, leaving the lower class with fewer options, creating biologically driven social barriers. Furthermore the decay of disability support systems due to prenatal testing can lead to an increased pressure to eliminate those unfit for society (4,Kitcher, 214).
"Eugenics: Did the Eugenics Movement Benefit the United States?" History in Dispute. Ed. Robert J. Allison. Vol. 3: American Social and Political Movements, 1900-1945: Pursuit of Progress. Detroit: St. James Press, 2000. 17-23. Canada In Context. Web. 19 Feb. 2014.
27 May 2014. The "Nazi Eugenics" Alpha History: Nazi Germany. N.p., n.d. Web.
The Human Genome Project is the largest scientific endeavor undertaken since the Manhattan Project, and, as with the Manhattan Project, the completion of the Human Genome Project has brought to surface many moral and ethical issues concerning the use of the knowledge gained from the project. Although genetic tests for certain diseases have been available for 15 years (Ridley, 1999), the completion of the Human Genome Project will certainly lead to an exponential increase in the number of genetic tests available. Therefore, before genetic testing becomes a routine part of a visit to a doctor's office, the two main questions at the heart of the controversy surrounding genetic testing must be addressed: When should genetic testing be used? And who should have access to the results of genetic tests? As I intend to show, genetic tests should only be used for treatable diseases, and individuals should have the freedom to decide who has access to their test results.
First, the global history of the eugenics movement is contextually relevant to this study since eugenics policies provided the backbone which legitimized the prisoner medical experimentation program in Nazi Germany. In 1859, Charles Darwin published On the Origin of the Species, in which he elucidated his Theory of Evolution through natural selection. Darwin suggested that species arise and thrive through inherited variations that increase the species’ ability to compete, survive and reproduce in order to pass on favorable traits to offspring. Sociologist Herbert Spencer took Darwin’s Theory of Evolution one step further, by proposing that societies behave like organisms and also evolve through natural selection. Spencer believed that strong cultures containing individuals with genetically advantageous characteristics would eventually overpower weak cultures containing individuals with genetically disadvantageous characteristics. Spencer’s theory, later named Social Darwinism, expanded globally in the 1870’s providing the basis for a subsequent eugenics movement. As Richard Weikart of Johns Hopkins University, wrote “The eugenics movement emerged…forthrightly based on Darwinian presuppositions”2 [SHOULDN’T THIS FOOTNOTE ‘2’ BE AT END OF SENTENCE?]because it allowed for a scientific explanation to justify why the population should be controlled. Thus, scientists and nations sought to implement Spencer’s theory, and embraced eugenics as a means to create a better world. Eugenicists believed that in order to have a successful society with the more desired traits, individuals with “negative” characteristics should not be permitted to reproduce. One of the world’s first eugenics movements, the
Eugenics have been around in the United States as early as the nineteenth century. Sir Francis Galton, the cousin of Charles Darwin, believed the world would vastly improve with the use of selective breeding in individual with the most desirable traits. However, the people considered with unsatisfying traits, were sterilized without their permission. Numerous people found this method to be unethical and morally wrong. Many believed that creating the perfect human race was humorously impossible, considering everyone views ‘perfection’ in different ways. The attempt to perfect the human race by controlling reproduction with eugenics is not only unethical, but it is also stealing the unique traits that make a person who they truly are.
Although the idea of eugenics had a fairly innocent beginning idea to it, as time went by the idea was slowly planted into corrupted minds. The term “eugenics”, meaning “well-born”, was coined by a man named Sir Francis Galton. This idea came around in 1883, when Galton attained the idea based off of upper-class Britain, and how to improve humans towards that goal. Later that century, the same idea took hold in the United States, which involved actual “efforts to stop” these “negative traits” passing from generation to generation (“Introduction to”). Mainly those in the lower class, immigrants, minorities, etc. were seen as having more of a part in the negative traits, and as such they were often the ones sought after. In fact, many Americans were sterilized without consent in efforts to stop their genes from passing on. These procedures often happened when other consented medical surgeries had to take place anyway. Along with physically and mentally disabled people being sterilized, “it was[n’t]... uncommon for African American women to be sterilized” (“Introduction to”). This idea of eugenics slowly mellowed out in the U.S. around the time of World War II.
As the medical field expands, it is nearly destroying every moral thing we stand for. We need to find the moral line and stand our ground. Prenatal genetic testing is a complicated topic for several families. This procedure is arranged in order to predict the health of
In a survey of 999 people who sought genetic counseling conducted by Feighanne Hathaway, M.S., of New York University Langone Medical Center, and colleagues, “Most were eager for a wider spectrum of prenatal genetic tests -- as long as they were for disease” (Smith).
A more popular tool of eugenics was forced sterilization, employed on a raft of lost souls who, through misbehavior or misfortune fell into the hands of state governments……Louie was never more than an inch from juvenile hall or jail, as a serial troublemaker, a failing student, and a suspect Italian, he was just the sort of rogue that eugenicists wanted to cull” (Hillenbrand 11). Contrary to popular belief, the Nazi Party in Germany did not begin the practice of eugenics. The actual practice of eugenics started in California in 1909. It was spread throughout the rest of the country by the 1930s. Many of the criteria of the “unfit” were things that people couldn’t control or needed help controlling, such as
Improvements to prenatal genetic testing occurs everyday, allowing for cheaper and less invasive tests that allow parents to understand if their child will have any deadly diseases. I have compiled six resources in which I summarize, assess, analyze, and reflect to support and defend my argument about the pros and cons of prenatal genetic testing.
According to Selgelid (2014), “the eugenically-motivated Nazi program of ‘‘Racial Hygiene’’ included a sterilization program that was initially inspired by, and modelled after, the California sterilization program,” (p.5). It is evident, the barbaric practice of this type of racism has occurred all around the world at various times in history. Specifically, “the Nazis… [passed the] 1933 Law for Prevention of Defective Progeny… [and] sterilized a total of 400,000 persons” (Selgelid, 2014, p.5). The moral ineptitude of past governments and dictators has resulted in societies embracing superiority over each other. While Nazi Germany may be one of the largest scale operations to date, there have been numerous all around the world. For example, Coutts’ & McCormick’s research (1995) showed that in 1995 China passed a law requiring “premarital checkups to determine whether either partner carries "genetic diseases of a serious nature," infectious diseases (AIDS, gonorrhoea, syphilis, and leprosy), or a "relevant mental disease.”” (p.165). The popularity of eugenics has certainly died out over time, however, the massive role it played in history has heavily influenced the tenor of beliefs in current society and modern
The definition of it as a “social philosophy” is not universally accepted. The idea of Eugenics was developed by Frederick Osborn, a relative of Charles Darwin. Like his cousin, Osborn explored ideas and theories regarding how the human race as a whole could become stronger. (S4) Originally, eugenic ideas were created from the political spectrum of population control, taxation, and other government interests. The Eugenics Movement has historically become negatively associated with Nazi Germany. The Nazi’s claimed at the Nuremberg trials that the US Eugenics program was similar in many ways. This point was invalid as early research conducted by the United States was aimed at preventing the several dominant diseases of the time, including polio. Many countries have banned eugenics as a result of its early affiliation to World War II. In the 1980’s and 1990’s, new assisted reproductive technology procedures were developed such as gestational surrogacy, (3)preimplantation, and cytoplasmic transfer. However, these few advanced practices have given fear about a possible new wave of genetic violations, despite the immense medical benefits these technologies have to