What Are The Differences Between Divergent And The Hunger Games

1012 Words3 Pages

Imagine a community, a seemingly perfect society, with one fatal flaw: the inhabitants lack any control over their own lives. A Utopian society claims to offer an idealized world, although, as seen in literature examples, fails to succeed.The popular young adult novels Divergent by Veronica Roth and The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins are set in so-called Utopian societies, offering different takes on the classic utopia/dystopia genre.
In Divergent, the female protagonist, Tris lives in a community with utopian goals and lofty ideals. In Tris's city, the government gives people medication, so they do not question authority. While the drugs work for many, for Tris and few others, the dose fails. Divergent groups the town up into five factions. At a young age, children are tested to see what faction they should be in. In Divergent, the people control the government but in The Hunger Games the government is run by the wealthiest people in the community, and those people do not care what happens to the other people. These individuals, considered "divergent" cannot be controlled by the government medication doses. The government seeks to control, to ensure these people do not destroy their Utopian society. For this purpose, the government's …show more content…

Tris’s love for Four is the driving plot point of Divergent. She does not care if she is not supposed to be with Four, she is going to be with him. This romantic dynamic causes Tris to risk her life multiple times for the sake of Four and their potential life together. Divergent presents a more realistic way of showing what people would do to survive, and how far people may go to protect those they love. While The Hunger Games tackles issues of control and corruption, it remains fictional, offering a virtual work and a hypothetical vision of the extremes of human

Open Document