Handmaid's Tale Vs The Hunger Games Analysis

3331 Words7 Pages

ISU
Compare and Contrast Essay
The Handmaid’s Tale vs. The Hunger Games
ENG 4U0
Ms. Woloshin
Salma Desai

A dystopian text often consists of a society that is based on a utopian ideal of a “perfect” society. Despite being a fictitious setting, the more realistic a dystopian text seems, the more disturbing it is for the audience. The novel The Handmaid’s Tale, written by Margaret Atwood, takes place in the Republic of Gilead that was formerly the state of Massachusetts. Massachusetts has been reformed to a place where puritan traditions and beliefs are the only customs allowed. Gilead and its totalitarian government oppress women to the extent where rape is a norm in their society. The novel The Hunger Games, written by Suzanne Collins, is about a contest held in the country of Panem, where twelve teenagers are forced to fight one another until only one survives the battle. The people of Panem are mandated in watching this contest, as a reminder of the previous uprising that was stopped by their totalitarian government called the Capitol. Atwood depicts Gilead in a way where it is almost possible for the society in Gilead to …show more content…

In a dystopian society, this totalitarian state is a dictatorship, mandating everyone under its ruling to obey them, and making selfish decisions that disregard the freedom and/or happiness of any of their citizens. In The Handmaid’s Tale, the government allows little to no room for anyone to rebel. The rebellion seen in this novel is so minimal that in present-day it would not be considered a major act of rebellion. The government in The Handmaid’s Tale is so controlling that they have given the Handmaids assigned phrases and/or responses for conversing. For example, when Offred meets Ofglen for the first time, their conversation is very passive, and they use all the right

Open Document