Unicameral and Bicameral Legislatures

2146 Words5 Pages

Explain the differences in between unicameral and bicameral legislatures. What are their virtues and vices?
Introduction
For years, countries have had different legislatures bicameral and unicameral. The features of each legislatures are distinct from one another. It even accounts to various vices and virtues. Both legislatures exist in various countries in the world. The reason to which varies in each place. Legislatures are essential for a society to perform politically well. However, the political structure of every nations varies thus, there exist no simple generalization. The structural arrangements of different legislatures are distinct in relation to their number of chambers available. (Danziger, J. N. (1996))
Unicameralism
Smaller nations and most parliaments follow unicameralism which consists of a single chamber. For example, New Zealand, Nordic countries such as Denmark, Iceland and Finland are unicamerals as well. [Arter 1984, 16-22 and Damgard 1992 ](Patterson, S. C., & Mughan, A. (1999) 3). This is most likely due to the fact that balance of political conflict is prevalent in smaller countries. Thus, it’s relatively more efficient to solve political issues thereby choosing unicameralism. (Mahler, Gregory S. 2008) Examples of unicameralism can be found in China, South Korea, Greece, Israel, Kenya and New Zealand. (Danziger, J. N. (1996)) (163)
Legislatures have changed bicameralism to unicameralism. For example, the elimination of upper chambers in Denmark. China is also a very large unicameral assembly through the national people’s congress.
Formation/composition of the houses, underlying reasons
Unicameral is one house which undergoes all the legislative procedures by one house only. On the other hand, bicamerali...

... middle of paper ...

...ralism.pdf
Testa,C. (2009) Bicameralism and Corruption. Royal Holloway University of London and STICERD (LSE). http://personal.rhul.ac.uk/ulte/108/papers/TestaEERfebruary182009finaldraft.pdf
Taylor, H. (1910). The constitutional crisis in Great Britain: Bicameral system should be retained with House of Lords reorganized on an elective basis. Concord, N.H: Rumford Press. 6th edition http://library.hku.hk/search~S6?/X(bicameral)&searchscope=6&Da=&Db=&m=b&SORT=D/X(bicameral)&searchscope=6&Da=&Db=&m=b&SORT=D&SUBKEY=(bicameral)/1%2C3%2C3%2CB/frameset&FF=X(bicameral)&searchscope=6&Da=&Db=&m=b&SORT=D&2%2C2%2C Van, B. S. D., & University of Pittsburgh. (1995). Post-passage politics: Bicameral resolution in Congress. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 6th edition http://digital.library.pitt.edu/cgi-bin/t/text/text idx?idno=31735057897302;view=toc;c=pittpress

Show More
Related

  • Similarities Between The Constitution And California Constitution

    1210 Words  | 3 Pages

    Starting in the legislative branch, some minor differences include the federal bicameral legislature containing the Senate and the House of Representatives (U.S. Const. art. I, § 2&3), whereas ...

    Read More

  • Parliamentary Sovereignty and Jackson v. Attorney General

    1950 Words  | 4 Pages

    Cases on the foundations of a constitutional order, such as parliamentary sovereignty, tend to be rare in any event. But what makes R (Jackson) v. Attorney General [2005] U.K.HL. 56; [2006] 1 A.C. 262 a significant case, is the dicta regarding constitutional issues mentioned by the judges in relation to parliamentary sovereignty. The discussions of the central issues in the case are in many ways constitutionally orthodox, treating the primary concerns as that of statutory interpretation and adopting a literal interpretation of the 1911 Act. By contrast, the discussion of the wider issues suggest that the judiciary may have support for what could be classed as unorthodox opinions on the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty. The concept of parliamentary sovereignty is to be considered as a mere ideology in the eyes of the legislature, as the modern day practical sovereign parliament is far from that of the theory.

    Read More

  • Three Branches of the Texas Government

    1619 Words  | 4 Pages

    Our Legislative Branch has two chambers or as some will call it bicameral. The chambers consist of the Senate and the House of Representatives just like the National Legislative Branch. In our Senate we currently have a total of 31 members and there are 150 members in the House of Representatives. Senators hold their seat for 4 years and their election years are spread out while the House of Representatives are elected for two-year terms. In our Texas Legislature we have a few authority figures. “The Texas Constitution provides that the lieutenant governor shall serve as president of the senate, the presiding officer of that body. The lieutenant governor is elected statewide by voters of Texas and is the second-highest ranking officer of the executive branch of government”. (Texas Medical Associaton) In the House of Representatives we have a Speaker of the House who is chosen in each time a new legislature starts by its own members. “The speaker maintains order during floor debate, recognizing legislators who wish to speak and ruling on procedural matters.” (Joe Straus Speaker) There are also many committees who act as important gatekeepers and shape the proposed legislation. (University of Texas at Austin). The main pu...

    Read More

  • External Factors In Congress

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    These desires interact with one another in different ways, giving rise to the need for different strategies employed by members of House and Senate. When members' reelection needs and personal policy preferences are similar within the party and differ substantially between parties, as we see in a highly polarized Congress, it makes sense for them to organize their parties and endow their leaders with the resources necessary to facilitate the achievement of their goals. Scholars have argued that the contemporary parties are elaborately organized so as to facilitate joint action toward collective goals, while also providing members with much-prized opportunities to participate in the legislative process. An increased reliance over the past three decades on special rules in the House to achieve legislative goals rather than compromise and negotiation has become the norm, rather than the

    Read More

  • The Structure Of Congress And Affects It Has On Its Policy Making Role

    969 Words  | 2 Pages

    Contrasts in the lawmaking methodology utilized as a part of the House and Senate reflect the distinctive size of the two chambers and individual terms of its parts. In the House, the dominant part gathering is inflexibly in control, stacking advisory groups with lion 's share party parts, and utilizing principles to seek after enactment supported by its parts. In the Senate, singular parts are better ready to hold up the procedure, which prompts lower similarity costs, however higher exchange costs. The complication of the lawmaking procedure gives rivals different chances to murder a bill, making a solid predisposition for the present state of affairs.

    Read More

  • Political Gridlock And Dysfunction Essay

    1601 Words  | 4 Pages

    Political gridlock and dysfunction is a central aspect of studying Congress because it determines a huge part of how they function and their general effectiveness. When it comes to the political landscape in the United States, law-making and legislation ultimately comes down to what the Senate and the House of Representatives vote on and how they vote. Gridlock has been studied for years because of how it has changed the political landscape, essentially from the beginning. The Jacksonian Era in the mid 1800’s shifted the way that political parties operated, and from then on a two-party system has been a critical part of American politics. The winner-take-all format of elections in the United States, along with the increasing importance of political parties, has forced a two-party system into being and prevented a third party from being able to get their feet off the ground for more than one or two elections.

    Read More

  • The US Constitution

    1697 Words  | 4 Pages

    In comparison to the American System of government, other nations such as Britain, France, Canada, and Mexico are quite similar. The British Parliamentary system does not have two houses of the legislature; however it has the upper house called the House of Lords, which were comprised of Britain as in dukes, earls, viscounts, barons, and bishops.

    Read More

  • The Difference Between The Constitution And The Articles Of Confederation

    1121 Words  | 3 Pages

    way they are set up, the articles is unicameral legislature which refers to as congress. The

    Read More

  • Parliamentary Sovereignty

    1481 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the most influential and celebrated scholars of British consistutional law , Professor A.V Dicey, once declared parliamentary soverignity as “the dominant feature of our political insitutions” . This inital account of parliamentray soverginity involved two fundamental components, fistly :that the Queen-in-Parliament the “right to make or unmake any law whatever” and that secondly “no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament.” . However this Diceyian notion though an established principle of our constitution now lies uneasy amongst a myriad of contemporary challenges such as our membership of the European Union, the Human Rights Act and a spread of law making authority known as ‘Devolution’. In this essay I shall set out to assess the impact of each of these challenges upon the immutability of the traditional concept of parliamentary sovereignty in the British constitution.

    Read More

  • UK's Constitution: The Rule of Law and Parliamentary Sovereignty

    1681 Words  | 4 Pages

    ... idea of Parliamentary Sovereignty: The Controlling Factor of Legality in the British Constitution’ (2008) OJLS 709.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Presidential Power

    1184 Words  | 3 Pages

    As seen quite often in the Obama administration, legislation gets stuck and lost in Congress due to the polarization of the parties in recent years. In Obama’s case, he has frequently threatened to go around the House and Senate if they could not reach an agreement or would shoot down his plans. Cato’s Pilon points out, however, that the hurdles of Congress are no mistake. Pilot states that the framer’s of the Constitution knew what they were doing, and this was intended to keep the checks and balances as well as accountability to the public (Lyons,

    Read More

  • Should Senate Be Abolished Research Paper

    1935 Words  | 4 Pages

    This essay will examine the question as to whether the senate should be abolished or retained. It will draw upon the main values of Australian Public Law to suggest that … In section I, the essay will cover the background and role of the Senate. Section II covers an explanation on the unicameral parliament as an alternative. In section III the Senate’s implications on a representative and responsible government is examined.

    Read More

  • Proportional Representation Vs. Single-Member Districts Summary

    552 Words  | 2 Pages

    Essentials of Comparative Politics defines a single-member district as “an electoral district with one seat,” (P. A-22) and a proportional representation system as “an electoral system in which political parties compete in multimember districts; voters choose between parties, and the seats in the district are awarded proportionally according to the results of the vote.” (P. A-21) The Unites States and Canada are two countries that operate under a single-member district system. In these two countries, each

    Read More

  • Bicameralism In Australia

    951 Words  | 2 Pages

    William Heller (1997, 486) argued that through a bicameral system, the government is forced to add more spending to the budget than normal in order to pass through the two houses. This then increases the government’s budget deficit. Through a unicameral system, the number of members are fewer and the process is more direct causing an elimination of the legislative duplication and redundancy. However, the money that can be saved by reducing the amount of staff and bill duplication is invaluable compared to the ineffectiveness of legislation from a unicameral government. A bicameral government upholds the effectiveness of legislative making and ensuring that the little details of bills can be amended by going through the two houses.

    Read More

  • Parliamentary and Presidential Systems of Government

    2408 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout history there has been progression on how the government has been organized and, alternatively, its position, and role in the public sphere. Two dominant, different government systems have emerged in North American politics, the presidential and parliamentary systems, in America and Canada respectively. These neighbouring systems have components, which are different but also share some commonalities; these key characteristics propose several strengths and weaknesses among them.

    Read More

More about Unicameral and Bicameral Legislatures

Open Document