The Difference Between The Constitution And The Articles Of Confederation

1121 Words3 Pages

The Article of Confederation was approved by congress (Nov. 15, 1777) and was ratified by the states on March 1, 1781. The attempt by a new country to unite itself and form a national government. “The articles of Confederation and the Constitution” www.Historynet.org the new Constitution was rewritten in 1787 in Independence Hall. The new Constitution is unified with a lot more power. The differences between the Constitution and the Articles of confederation is the way they are set up, the articles is unicameral legislature which refers to as congress. The Constitution on the bright side established a bicameral legislature with an upper house and a lower house which is the House of Representatives(Bruns). They changed because different …show more content…

The Bill of Rights also provided safeguards for those accused of crimes. Two amendments — the right to bear arms (Second Amendment) and the right to refuse to have soldiers quartered in your home (Third Amendment) — were clearly reactions to British rule. The antifederalists were pleased by the addition of the Tenth Amendment, which declared that all powers not expressly granted to Congress were reserved to the states. “The articles of Confederation and the Constitution” www.Historynet.org Over the years the Bill of Rights has become an important core of American values. The compromise that created the Bill of Rights also defined what Americans would come to cherish above almost all else. Together with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, the Bill of Rights helps to define the American political system and the government 's relationship to its citizens. The Bill of Rights still remains active in the contemporary American life as the major element of the constitutional law. One of the new representatives from Virginia to the First Federal Congress, as established by the new Constitution, he worked tirelessly to persuade

Open Document