Decisive Factors of Union Victory in the Civil War

856 Words2 Pages

THESIS AND KEY ARGUMENTS Success in war may seem inevitable for the side with the most military might, the higher amount of resources, and the larger industry to support war efforts; however, this is not necessarily true. Victory is most often awarded to those who are best able to organize and utilize war resources and to those who have the “willpower which provides the direction and the moral strength to continue.” In the case of the Civil War, while the North had a clear advantage in resources and manpower, triumph was not imminent. It was through their employment of those resources and manpower, and their ability to change strategies, that the Union was victorious. EVIDENCE Such a large economic disparity existed that the North had …show more content…

However, President Abraham Lincoln found he had some political advantages over the South. While Davis easily turned supporters away from him by his personality, Lincoln demonstrated that he was willing to work with anyone who supported his cause, the preservation of the Union. Through this willingness, his determination, and his ability to keep people interested in the task ahead of them, Lincoln became the “embodiment of the Union will and the key figure in the defeat of the Confederacy.” There were significant differences in the quality of military leaders and the strategies they employed in battle. Robert E. Lee employed a Napoleonic strategy very effectively - he was able to divide his force and confront his enemy successfully, even while much smaller in number. However, when it came to tactics, he was too Napoleonic. He failed to understand that the war had turned to a struggle not just between armies, but between people. He believed that the Union’s defeat would happen through victory on the battlefield and not through destroying the economy or terrorizing the …show more content…

Through the North’s abilities to effectively use and increase its manufacturing capabilities, its armies were better equipped and maintained than the South’s. The North was adaptive in its military strategies and looked outside of the battlefield for victories against the South’s economy and people. And finally, the North was able to keep the states and people unified through a president who was willing to work with his generals and politicians to maintain the soldiers’ and citizens’ morale to ensure the Union did not become

Open Document