Compare And Contrast The Low Cost And Best-Cost Provider

1869 Words4 Pages

In today’s highly competitive market there is an overabundance of companies providing consumers comparable products and services. For a company to be competitive and remain solvent within the market business owners and managers must analyze and utilize multiple strategies to maintain and increase their market share. Of the many strategies the two most commonly utilized are the low-cost and best-cost providers. To understand these two commonly utilized strategies one must review the companies that have successfully implemented them.
The strategy of a low-cost provider is to pass along negotiated price advantages to the consumer. This practice encourages the continued patronage of existing consumers while attracting consumers who are looking for ways to improve their shrinking budgets. Although the profit margins are reduced for these types of transactions, a company can make up the difference by increasing the quantity sold. Successful companies that have initiated this strategy include Walmart, Spirit Airlines and Taco Bell. While these companies are not in competing markets, they have shown that the low-cost provider strategy can be successfully applied to various consumer venues.
Out of all of the low-cost providers Walmart has …show more content…

Consumers love their Honda vehicles because the vehicle has a record of consistent performance, low maintenance, and high quality. Honda utilizes the best cost provider strategy and consumers do not seem to mind paying a little more for the quality built into the product. High mileage and older Honda trucks and cars retain their value. They have a higher resale value because of the vehicle’s reliable reputation that has been proven time and again. While Hondas are not initially low cost vehicles and are not considered a ‘higher end’ vehicle, they are considered to be a reasonably priced reliable and retainable consumer

Open Document