Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research on the impact of religion on healthcare
Ethical dilemma in religion and medicine
Islam thoughts on western medicine
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Research on the impact of religion on healthcare
Sibling Saviors and the Six Ethical Options as seen in Geisler’s Book Sibling Saviors Suppose a parent has a child suffering from a disease that is slowly killing them, such as acute promyelocytic leukemia, APL, or types of severe anemia to give a general idea. Eventually, their kidneys are going to shut down and despite years of fighting, the only way to keep that child alive is having them hooked up to machines until their organs completely give out and they die or become comatosed, in a vegetative state. All therapies, tests, treatments, and options have been exhausted. Wouldn’t a parent do anything to save their child? After discovering that neither parents nor their siblings are compatible for transfusions or organ donations, the family …show more content…
Legalism is the first characteristic one thinks of when considering the first of these three Christian perspectives on an ethical view, unqualified absolutism. Examples of this are Islam, the Pharisees and Sadducees in the New Testament, the early Christian Church, and other similar institutions. There are universal moral absolutes, laws or rules, and all of them must be obeyed. They are viewed as unwavering statutes that dictate society and life of the individual and these rules cannot be broken without punishment as retaliation. They see that all moral conflicts as superficial and also believe that moral responsibilities have no exclusions and are essential to life, as Immanuel Kant viewed. Lying and murder are seen as lethal to society and must be dealt with quickly, and one cannot lie to save someone’s life. In the case for savior siblings, should this be practiced, moral absolutes dictate that man should not impede on what God has ordained to occur, the child being sick, nor should we ‘play God’ by making a child in a petri dish in a lab. They believe that God will do one of four things for the sick child: He will deliver the parents from the ethical dilemma, God would have/will intervene on the behalf of the family, to heal the child of the sickness or let the child pass quietly, bring the family through the hardship, or He will allow the child to suffer and ultimately die because the child or parents had sinned or done some wrong to cause the disease in the first place. Savior siblings would not even be considered if the parents were to follow the unqualified absolutism philosophies and they would pray for God to heal their child or to let the child pass as peacefully as they
When viewing organ donation from a moral standpoint we come across many different views depending on the ethical theory. The controversy lies between what is the underlying value and what act is right or wrong. Deciding what is best for both parties and acting out of virtue and not selfishness is another debatable belief. Viewing Kant and Utilitarianism theories we can determine what they would have thought on organ donation. Although it seems judicious, there are professionals who seek the attention to be famous and the first to accomplish something. Although we are responsible for ourselves and our children, the motives of a professional can seem genuine when we are in desperate times which in fact are the opposite. When faced with a decision about our or our children’s life and well being we may be a little naïve. The decisions the patients who were essentially guinea pigs for the first transplants and organ donation saw no other options since they were dying anyways. Although these doctors saw this as an opportunity to be the first one to do this and be famous they also helped further our medical technology. The debate is if they did it with all good ethical reasoning. Of course they had to do it on someone and preying upon the sick and dying was their only choice. Therefore we are responsible for our own health but when it is compromised the decisions we make can also be compromised.
Even if their baby is not able to live, they want to give another baby that opportunity. They want to give another family the opportunity to see their child grow. Sometimes the parents of an anencephalic infant want to donate the infant 's organs to other babies who need healthy organs. They say that, “by donating the newborn 's organs, they feel that the pregnancy would at least have had some value: their own loss can be another family 's gain.” In the United States, about 2000 babies each year need organs, and the only suitable organs for tiny babies are those from other tiny babies. However, there are also some parents who wish to keep their baby alive. ("3. ANENCEPHALIC BABIES
Raising a child with a disability will have an impact, positive or negative, on the structure of a family system. Research concerning how various disabilities affect the family functions focuses primarily on the parents. Siblings are seldom included in the research, yet they can provide a stable, powerful developmental context for socioemotional development.
It seems that we would do everything we could to keep them fighting, and not letting them give up. But sometimes allowing them to have a “good death” is the right thing to do. A “good death” does not involve an intensive medical care in hospitals; rather, the patient’s care is in hands of his or her family that ensures “maximum consciousness and minimum pain” (Bjorklund B. R., 2011, p. 341). When it comes to arranging a hospice care for a dying patient in Ukraine, it is much easier than it is in the United States. Perhaps, my parents being doctors played an important role in fulfilling my grandfathers’ dying wishes to spend the rest of their days at home with their families. My parents did the best they could to ease the pain my grandfathers were going through. Although one of my grandfathers had a lung cancer, he refused to be tortured by the harsh treatments, like chemo, that would make him suffer the rest of his days, rather than let him enjoy what life had left for him. The thought of not trying all the methods to cure the cancer left my mother blaming herself for not trying enough. But she understood that it was the best thing she could do for him not to suffer more than he already did. Seeing a person we love suffer may lead us to decisions that are controversial with our feelings, but appear to be the right thing to
3. A parent might be required to undergo lifesaving treatment if there is a compelling state interest in protecting the welfare of a child from being deprived of his needed caretaker.
Now imagine if it were you, that needed a liver, heart, or other organ transplant. You want to live to see so much more in life, but you did not get on the list in time and there is a shortage in organ donors. You must say good bye to life, your loved ones and every thing else. This is not a good thing to imagine, yet people die everyday with this feeling.
It has been found that sibling physical abuse occurs much more frequently than abuse by parents. Sibling abuse is defined as the physical, emotional and/or sexual abuse from one sibling to the other. It is estimated that 53% of children physically abuse a sibling each year. Older siblings are much more likely to abuse the younger siblings, especially older male siblings, while younger female siblings are most likely to be victims of sibling abuse. Sibling abuse often goes undetected or slips under the radar because parents think it’s normal, or choose not to take action. A parent’s reaction is vital in sibling abuse, as it gives a chance for remediation and healing for both the perpetrator and the victim.
Can you imagine your little child needs a kidney transplant? If child gets it in time, he will live a long, happy life. Without it, your child has a short time period to live. You signed up for kidney donor waiting list; time is ticking, time is running out, you do not believe it, but it is a long line, no donor was found; at the end you are lost your child…Unfortunately, this saddest end is really common in our life.
I believe that parents are not morally justified in having a child merely to provide life saving medical treatment to another child or family member, but that this does not mean that the creation of savior siblings is morally impermissible. By having a child solely to provide life saving medical treatment, you are treating this child merely as a means rather than an end to the individual child. By having the child solely as a means to save another, you are violating this savior sibling in that you are treating them as a source of spare parts that can be used by the sickly child in order to solely promote the prolonged life of the currently sick child. This view that having a child merely as a way to provide medical treatment does not consider the multitude of other avenues that this newborn child can take, and presupposes that the child will only be used for the single purpose of providing life saving medical treatment through use of stems cells or organ donation. What this view fails to consider is that these savior siblings are valued by families for so much more than just as a human bag of good cells and organs that can be used to save the life of the original child. Instead, these savior siblings can be valued as normal children themselves, in that they can be valued in the same way that any other child who is born is valued, yet at the same time they will also be able to provide life-saving treatment to their sibling. My view runs parallel to the view held by Claudia Mills who argues that it is acceptable to have a savior sibling, yet at the same time we can not have a child for purely instrumental motives, and instead should more so value the child for the intrinsic worth that they have. Mills presents her argument by puttin...
The up-to-date medical advancement has come a long way, including making it possible for donating one’s major organs, blood, and tissues to desperate individuals needing them to sustain life. Organ donation still has problems even with the modern technology and breakthroughs. The majority of individuals need to comprehend to have a successful organ transplant it is essential to have active individuals that are willing to donate their organs. Typically, most individuals or family that consent to donate their precious organ 's desire life to continue. Their intentions are when one life is gone there is hope for another life to continue. Health care is experiencing a shortage in organ donation and the people that desperately need these organs
For instance, incest is a combination of breaking family situations which include lack of communication. In a way to understand more, I have conducted a research that I have titled Mother at the early age where I interviewed Olan Martha who lives in the city of Tabasco, Mexico and who was victim of incest. Martha relates in her testimony how at “the early age of 12 years old, she was victim of incest by her stepfather and procreated three children with him, this case occurred while the mother was living under the same house and she did not notice the constant sexual abuse, however, after the mother finds out about the abuses, she decided to break apart from her husband, while the mother was determined to take legal actions towards the abuser,
Babies clearly cannot comprehend the situation they face. A child should have the opportunity to live and fulfill the life that they have been granted. Limiting one’s life simply because it currently does not promise prosperity is an action that cannot be pardoned. The proper measures must be taken to ensure the longest life possible for children. Babies who become extremely ill at a young age deserve the opportunity to have a life. The chance that their lives may be hindered by the strain of medical attention and complications does not vindicate the choice that they should die, because there is hope for a prosperous outcome. According to Kathlyn Gay, assisted suicide “…ignores the possibility that a person’s life might be improved…” (Gay, 2016, para. 2). By eliminating the chance of proceeding any further, there is no way to know what could have resulted, and that is what makes the choice of death morally wrong. Regardless of age, it is unfair to terminate a life when one is incapable of expressing his or her aspirations on the
How would a society mature if it did not advance alongside technology? This is one of the questions impressed upon me while reading an excerpt from American poet and author Robert Bly’s book The Sibling Society. Bly defines a sibling society as a society that is filled with half-mature adults filling the void left by improper role models. They use internet and electronic entertainment as a substitution for the values and convictions that would have been imparted in them by an authoritative figure. Although we have an alarming amount of immature adults, we are not becoming a sibling society due to technology. With the use of technology, recent generations are now growing up with an awareness of the issues in the world around them, helping them
Prolonging the suffering and meaningless live by others’ wills is contradictory because it is we who receive and live our lives, and others could not feel the ways we feel (e.g. suffering and pain) and live the lives we live. Prolong the lives of terminally ill children against their own wills is no different from controlling them as puppets with wires (heavy medication and surgeries), besides what if, even though rarely, some lunatic parents or guardians favors to see the suffering of the children and purposely prolonged their lives to see more of that. This unfair and disrespectful robbery of others’ rights about their own life and death choices could not be righteous and
If they don?t receive a donation soon enough, their time will run out and they will pass away. By donating organs you are giving of your body, something that will never again by seen after death. You are making the morally correct decision to help others. It seems we are all brought up to help others and give of yourself, and what better way to do so then by donating of your organs. When you go to get your drivers licence, be sure to mark that you will donate.