Should Smoking Be Public Places?

1013 Words5 Pages
The use of tobacco products has been exposed as the reason for numerous medical complications such as cancer to non-smokers and smokers who breathe in tobacco smoke. Taking into account cigarettes adversely affect public health, putting a ban on smoking in public places is an appropriate action for governments, and other establishments presenting services to the public. Cigarettes can cause harm to the wellbeing of non-smokers unbeknownst to them, they involuntarily breath in smoke respired by smokers. Several nations have created laws that prohibit smoking in communal locations because of its impact on second-hand smokers particularly juveniles. Even though many disputes have been presented in opposition or endorsement of public smoking, prohibiting the use of this tobacco product is the most suitable strategy. Claim and Background The escalation of the public smoking debate in the international community has sparked the curiosity of different societal groups, and how they perceive this drug. Sizable warning signs prohibit smoking in specified locations such as hospitals, schools, entertainment locales, public transports and offices are on the rise principally in the United States and Europe. These locations are frequently used by citizens daily and tend to be unavoidable. It is typical to locate assigned smoking sections in cities where smokers patronize. This inclination was not exemplified two decades ago because there was inadequate research on the various threats secondhand smoke presented. In Great Britain, smoking is sealed off, workplaces and enclosed public locations where prohibited since 1 July 2007. Scotland has also submitted similar legislation in March 2006, North Ireland on 30 April 2007 and Wales 3 April... ... middle of paper ... ... of tobacco smoke to experience the effects of second-hand smoke. Common Ground It is established that tobacco products cannot be rendered illegal because of its legality in almost every major country on the planet. Hence, the restriction of tobacco use should be accomplish using methods that are the least intrusive on individual freedoms, these changes should also not infringe on non-smokers rights. Conclusion Public tobacco use ought to be proscribed because passive smokers are apt to breathing in smoke involuntarily. Smokers must empathize with non-smokers and realize that many individuals would prefer not to inhale tobacco smoke and respect this by utilizing designated areas as to not negatively affect non-smokers. The defiance of uncaring smokers of the ramifications of smoking should not make them oblivious to the hazards that they put on nonsmokers.
Open Document