Stein Mart Case Study

707 Words2 Pages

On September 22, 2015 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Stein Mart Inc. “…for materially misstating its pre-tax income due to improper valuation of inventory subject to price discounts and for having inadequate internal accounting controls.” (Press Release). Stein Mart Inc. is a national retail chain store based in Jacksonville, Florida. Stein Mart, like many retailers, reduce prices of merchandise for periodic sales or for quick inventory turnover, but Stein Mart failed to properly record the reduced merchandise in which lead to an investigation by the SEC. Material misstatements in their financial statements and weaknesses in their internal controls were found. Stein Mart classifies certain reduced prices as Perm POS …show more content…

For example, if Stein Mart continued to show 30 percent more pre-tax income than they actually have then they are deceiving investors who use the financial statements that are published each quarter or year. This false information could drive investors into making decisions, ones that are crucial to an investors success, that they would not normally make had the financial statements been presented accurately (The Role of the …show more content…

Internal controls play an important role in a company (Internal Control). A company can fail or succeed based upon their quality of internal controls. Stein Mart had low quality internal controls. As an example, “…Stein Mart’s chief financial officer, who was hired in 2009, did not learn of Stein Mart’s treatment of Perm POS markdowns until the summer of 2011.” (Press Release). One component of the COSO framework of internal control is information and communication (Internal Control). The merchandising department made the decision to perform the markdowns in the manner they did without any approval from any other department. This is a weakness in the company because multiple departments, specifically the accounting department, should have been involved in the decision (Press Release). The accounting department in an ideal situation would have been against the proposed method of markdowns because their knowledge of the consequences from performing or recording a markdown in an inappropriate manner (Press Release). Since timeliness is critical the new CFO should have become informed about the matter of markdowns much sooner. Had the internal controls of Stein Mart been more aligned with the COSO framework then the chance of such misstatement would have been less likely to have

More about Stein Mart Case Study

Open Document