Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
accounting fraud and sarbanes oxley
internal control (review of literature )
literature review on internal control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: accounting fraud and sarbanes oxley
Internal controls are in place to protect entities against theft from dishonest workers and outside predators. They are also an accurate series of checks and balances and are in place to find discrepancies. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was named after Senator Paul Sarbanes and Michael Oxley. The Act has 11 titles and there are about six areas that are considered very important. (Sox, 2006) The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 made publicly traded United States companies create internal controls. The SOX act is mandatory, all companies must comply. These controls maybe costly, but they have indentified areas within companies that need to be protected. It also showed some companies areas that had unnecessary repeated practices. It has given investors a sense of confidence in companies that have complied with the SOX act. The SOX act section 404 requires that the auditor assess the company’s management of internal controls and report on it. The act requires that a company include a copy of the internal controls in the year end annual report. All financial statements must be certified by a company’s management. (Coustan, 2004) A company that announces deficiencies in its internal control will more than likely have a fall in their stock prices. Investors will not trust that company’s financial information. The investors know that the company will be hit with fines for not complying with the regulations. No honest investor wants to be involved with a company that defies the government. There are some limitations of internal controls. One is a person knowing the system. This person knows when everything is done and how it is done he or she can find a loophole and use it to his or her advantage. Another limitation is... ... middle of paper ... ...l. If a transaction is missing or the cash on hand is not adding up management should be notified. Even though internal controls do not always work, every entity that has workers should have internal controls. Internal controls protect entities from dishonest workers. Internal controls are a series of checks and balances. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was needed to gain control of accounting improprieties. Dishonest accounting has cost company employees millions of dollars in retirement funds. It has also cost investors millions of dollars. Works Cited A Guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2006). Retrieved December 16, 2009 from www.soxlaw.com Coustan, H., Leinicke, L.M., & Rexroad, W.M., Ostrosky, J.A. (2004). Sorbanes-Oxley What it means to the marketplace. Journal of Accountancy. Retrieved December 17, 2009 from www.journalofaccountancy.com
Implementing strategies to create an effective internal control environment is needed to prevent and detect controls of fraud (Murphy, 2015). Control is needed to combat fraud, enforcing employees and volunteers to do the right thing. Management must have control of the organizations operations to tackle risks when they arise (Arshad et al, 2015). According to Arshad et al (2015):
It has been a decade since the Sarbanes-Oxley Act became in effect. Obviously, the SOX Act which aimed at increasing the confidence in the US capital market really has had a profound influence on public companies and public accounting firms. However, after Enron scandal which triggered the issue of SOX Act, public company lawsuits due to fraud still emerged one after another. As such, the efficacy of the 11-year-old Act has continually been questioned by professionals and public. In addition, the controversy about the cost and benefit of Sarbanes-Oxley Act has never stopped.
Zhang, I. X. (September 01, 2007). Economic consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44, 74-115.
In 2002, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) to strengthen corporate governance and restore investor confidence. The act’s most important provision, §404, requires management and independent auditors to evaluate annually a firm’s internal financial-reporting controls. In addition, SOX tightens disclosure rules, requires management to certify the firm’s periodic reports, strengthens boards’ independence and financial-literacy requirements, and raises auditor-independence standards.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted on July 30, 2002. It was enacted by the 107th United States Congress. It is named after sponsors U.S. Senator Paul Sarbanes and U.S. Representative Michael G. Oxley. It is also known as the ‘Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act’ in the Senate and ‘Corporate and Auditing Accountability and Responsibility Act’ in the House. The main purpose of this act was to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made pursuant to the securities laws, and for other purposes. This act was enacted as a result to a number of corporate and accounting scandals including those affecting Enron, Tyco internationals, Adelphia, Peregrine Systems, and WorldCom. The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted many rules in order to implement the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
In conclusion, internal controls include separation of duties, assignment of responsibilities, third-party verification and the use of mechanical and physical controls. In and of themselves, these tactics stop and prevent much abuse of the bookkeeping and accounting systems. The addition of Sarbanes-Oxley requirements in 2002 require that a company enact internal controls and assign responsibility of the control system to executives and directors, further providing insurance that financial reporting is accurate. Without this insurance that reports are accurate, company stock will fall and investors will be lost. Even with intrinsic limitations, the positive aspects of good internal controls far outweigh the negative implications. Good internal controls equal accurate financial records and future company success.
According to PCAOB Auditing Standard 5 paragraph 2, “effective internal control over financial reporting provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes. If one or more material weaknesses exist, the company 's internal control over financial reporting cannot be considered
ensure that management is doing what it can to establish means of effective internal controls by having to report on them.
What is internal control? According to University of Phoenix, Axia College Internal Control and Cash (2009), internal control is all of the related methods and measures adopted within an organization to safeguard its assets and enhance the accuracy and reliability of its accounting records. The primary reasons for internal control are help companies protect their investments and merchandise against theft from everyone, including employees and to make sure that the accounting is done correctly and truthfully.
Summary of the Provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2004) AICPA. Retrieved November 9, 2013 http://www.aicpa.org/InterestAreas/ForensicAndValuation/Resources/FraudPreventionDetectionResponse/Pages/Summary%20of%20the%20Provisions%20of%20the%20Sarbanes-Oxley%20Act%20of%202002.aspx
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was passed by Congress to protect investors from fraudulent accounting records. The passing of the act forced strict regulations upon publicly traded companies to improve the accountability of accounting records for investors as a result of the extreme levels of malpractice that occurred in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. The implementation of the SOX Act changed the way accounting records were checked for injustices. With the act, upper level managers were required to certify financial statements for accuracy (section 302), it required management and auditors to establish internal controls along with reports on the efficiency of the costly controls (section 404), and added required outlines for electronic record keeping (section 802).
Accounts receivable can be improved by adding future growth in flow charts for invoicing. Nevertheless to say, expansion of the catering, and invoicing for business to business sales are required. In addition to this information, new collection method is added.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, also known as the SOX Act, is created in response to the series of deceptive and outright fraudulent activities of the big business in the 1990s. Sarbanes-Oxley, or SOX, is a federal law that is a complete reform of business practices. The Act points specifically at public accounting firms that take part in audits of corporations and it is passed in response to a number of corporate accounting scandals such as Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing, Tyco and Arthur Andersen. It sets new standards for the corporate management, corporate boards of directors, and public accounting firms. Almost all the scandals involved accusations of presumed “creative accounting,” or complicated
Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted following a prolonged period of corporate scandals involving large public companies from 2000 to 2002, this was to restore investors confidence in markets and close loopholes for public companies to defraud investors. This act has had a profound effect on cooperate governance in the US, it requires public companies to strengthen audit committees, perform internal controls tests, set personal liability of directors and officers for accuracy of financial statements, and strengthen disclosure. The Sarbanes-Oxley
Since the implementation of SOX, companies are required to establish effective and efficient internal controls in order to be in compliance with the SEC requirements (Jahmani & Dowling, 2015, p. 129). According to COSO internal control is defined as “a process, effected by an entity’s board of directors, management, and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of the following objectives: 1. Reliability of financial reporting, 2. Compliance with laws and other regulations, 3. Efficiency and effectiveness of business operations, and 4. Protection of property” (Kanagaretnam et al., 2014, p. 30 & Kapic, 2013, p. 63). Additionally, Kapic notes internal controls contain policy and procedures that assist the company and management with smooth operations of all daily business