Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Albert einstein theory of special relativity
Chapter 28: Special Relativity And Albert Einstein
Albert einstein theory of special relativity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Albert einstein theory of special relativity
In order to describe a scientific theory, it may be best to first define a scientific law. A scientific law is a set of equations or statements that describe physical phenomena or address the existence of phenomena. For example, the scientific laws of gravity proposed by Newton are sets of kinematic equations and logical expressions that describe the fact that a falling object, affected by no other forces, is affected by the force of gravity, and that that force of gravity causes an object to fall at 9.8 meters per second per second. These laws describe that gravity acts on an object, but not why gravity exists or gives reasons for gravity’s properties. A scientific theory differs from a scientific law in that a scientific theory is based …show more content…
On the contrary, scientific theories are first formed from a hypothesis that addresses a set of data or observations. If a hypothesis is demonstrated, by the data, to explain the observed phenomenon, the hypothesis may be accepted. Furthermore, if a hypothesis stands against testing across multiple experiments without failing, the hypothesis may then become theory if the body of evidence supporting the theory is well tested and broad in its support of the hypothesis. A scientific theory is far beyond a “shot in the dark” and is, instead, supported by tremendous levels of evidence and continually tested even after the theory’s …show more content…
Facts are simply observations: this rock contains high levels of iron, that wolf pack just consumed a male elk, etc. Laws are derivatives of facts such that laws are irrefutable descriptions of observations, as in the above description of Newton’s laws of gravity. While laws are important foundations upon which we construct our knowledge of that which surrounds us, theories can arguably serve a more important function because theories provide a possible and probable answer to the question of why. If we can provide an answer as to why something happens, we fundamentally know much more about that phenomenon than if there was a simple law describing what is happening. Returning to the example of general relativity, it is because of Einstein’s originally theories and the many evolved iterations of it through contemporary science that scientists thought to construct LIGO, or Laser Interferometer Gravity-wave Observatory. This station measures the minute changes in distance between stations on an x and y axis. In Einstein’s theory, it was predicted that gravity had the ability to propagate through space in the form of a wave, and that if a collision of two large enough bodies were to occur, a wave would propagate through space. On September 14, 2015, gravity waves from the collision of black holes that took place almost
Common Law vs. Political Law vs. Scientific Law Americans are no longer aware that there are two kinds of legal systems, political and scientific. America was founded on principles of scientific law. But these principles have now been submerged in today's legal system. What is taught today as law is political law. To understand the difference between a scientific legal system and a political one, it is necessary to know that scientific law developed in the absence of any legislature or Congress or Parliament whatever.
In science, a theory will refer to an explanation of an important feature of the world supported by testing and facts that have been gathered over time. It’s there scientific theories that allow scientists to make predictions about untested and unobserved concurrences in the world. The American Association for the Advancement of Science has this explanation of what a theory means to those in the science field, and it is as follows, “A scientific theory is a well substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts......Such fact supported theories are not guesses but reliable accounts of the real
Some genuinely testable theories, when found to be false, are still upheld by their admirers-for example by introducing some ad hoc auxiliary assumption, or re-interpreting the theory ad hoc in such a way that it escapes refutation. However, such a method either destroys or lowers its scientific status.” These criteria make it hard for pseudosciences such as astrology or dowsing to be considered science. There has also been large increases in the accuracy and use of technology is ensuring that there is more empirical evidence and proof that theories are being based on. Some may argue against the corrected ratio of falsified to accepted theories, but unless every theory in the history of science was to be measured that argument would be futile, and the above point would still
First, when observations are made, hypothesises are formed. To test these hypothesises scientists conduct experiments. If their hypothesis is right, it is confirmed by further experiments and validated by other scientists. After many experiments and confirmations, a theory is formed. A scientific theory is a broad and general idea or explanation provided by scientists and is related to observations and is supported by a large amount of evidence. A theory is not a fact however it is just a possible explanation. An example of a theory is the Big Bang Theory.
Theory: A general statement about some parts of the world that fit together and how they work; an explanation of how two or more facts are related
There are many definitions to theory. According to Akers (2009) “theories are tentative answers to the commonly asked questions about events and behavior” (Akers, (2009, p. 1). Theory is a set of interconnect statements that explain how two or more things are related in two casual fashions, based upon a confirmed hypotheses and established multiple times by disconnected groups of researchers.
”Theories tell how and why things work; how and why one variable is related to another. Research findings that are theory based can be place in a framework that advances science further than findings that are unconnected to formal theory.” (O'Connell, 2009, p. 33).
For instance, an entire new field of study known as "Evolutionary Psychology" is based on the premise that we can understand who we are today based on how we have evolved, and what we have evolved from. Evolution, is more or less a proven fact, analogous to gravity, it is a theory that we have used to understand countless other phenomena in the world around us. But there is no theory about how early man behaved, how he evolved, or even, what he looked like, that comes even close to being as widely accepted. In other words, this new field of study is based on science that does not yet exist, and might not ever exist, and the thinking behind it is similar to thinking behind the study of early man. Evolutionary psychologists use things we don't know about who we were then to try and understand who we are now, and anthropologists use things we don't know about who we are now to try and understand who we were then.
... a theory should be able to explain a wide variety of things, not just only what it was intended to explain.
Any hypothesis, Gould says, begins with the collection of facts. In this early stage of a theory development bad science leads nowhere, since it contains either little or contradicting evidence. On the other hand, Gould suggests, testable proposals are accepted temporarily, furthermore, new collected facts confirm a hypothesis. That is how good science works. It is self-correcting and self-developing with the flow of time: new information improves a good theory and makes it more precise. Finally, good hypotheses create logical relations to other subjects and contribute to their expansion.
12.) Theory - is a system of ideas to explain how a certain situation or event might have came about.
Does science depend upon the findings and possession of other types of knowledge for its effective running or is it directly based on scientific reasoning?
Most leading Greek intellectuals practised theoretical science. Aristotle, for example, referred to science as epistēmē, scientia in Latin. This definition “designated logically and empirically demonstrable knowledge of truth,” meaning it was a theoretical
The word theory emanated from the Greek word meaning “contemplate” It has been viewed by scholars in different ways. Theory can be defined literally as an explanation of phenomena and its associations with variables that it is attempting to predict. There are no general agreed definitions of theory because scholar’s views of what constitute theory differ based on the purpose, nature and what make up of a good theory (Gelso, 2006; Harlow, 2009; Stam, 2007, 2010; and Wacker 1998). For instance, Wacker, (1998), pointed out that a theory must have four basic criteria such as conceptual definitions, domain limitations, relationship-building, and predictions. He, also, opined that for any theory to be regarded as a good theory, it must have qualities for `good ' theory, such as “uniqueness, parsimony, conservation, generalizability, fecundity, internal consistency, empirical riskiness, and abstraction, which apply to all research methods” (p.364). Stam (2010) interpreted theory as ...
...and one cannot pull a conclusion for all people of this world by using around 30 subjects. A theory is not certain; it is just a thought that we have gathered; yet through your own experience, our surroundings we see them as convincing. Natural science theories are believable because of the proof given, yet these experiment results may also be inaccurate because of human errors or errors in the scientific equipments. A theory is a system of ideas in which we attempt to explain predict or describe something that might be believable to us. We use our emotions and reasoning for the theory’s validity. Over all, the questions whether an individual is convinced by a theory or not is based on his willingness to accept this theory, his own personal aspect and the humans trust towards it. The way a theory is described and how it is displayed is what makes it convincing.