Analysis Of Obergefell V. Hodges

700 Words2 Pages

Abstract On June 26, 2015 a divided Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples could now marry nationwide. At the time of the split ruling there were 9 supreme court justices, 5 of the justices were Republicans, and the remaining 4 were Democrats. In high profile cases it is except that the justices will vote along party lines. When the 5-4 ruling was reveled by the following statement. “It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right (Corn,2015).” written by
After Davis’ arrest the deputies in the clerk office resumed issuing marriage licenses. After 5 days in jail Nancy Davis was released and order not to interfere with the deputy’s issuance of marriage liquescence. Davis has aloud the deputies to continue issuing license but they have been altered. David removed the county name, her name and her signature, potential I am making the document invalid. There have been no reproductions for for altering the licenses. I wish someone would do punish her and not just sweep it under the rug. Even though I do not personally agree with Nancy Davis, in the United States of America she has the freedom to believe in whatever she wants to believe in. She has not once been asked to believe that a marriage is not only between a man and a woman, all the citizens of Rowan County want Davis to stop interring with what they believe. She is an elected state official governed by the Kentucky Constitution. The Kentucky Constitution is modelled after the U.S

Show More
Related

  • Case Citation: Kentucky V. King 563 US

    720 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Lexington, Kentucky a drug operation occurred at an apartment complex. Police officers of Lexington, Kentucky followed a suspected drug dealer into an apartment complex. The officers smelled marijuana outside the door of one of the apartments, as they knocked loudly the officers announced their presence. There were noises coming from the inside of the apartment; the officers believed that the noises were as the sound of destroying evidence. The officers stated that they were about to enter the apartment and kicked the apartment door in in order to save the save any evidence from being destroyed. Once the officer enters the apartment; there the respondent and others were found. The officers took the respondent and the other individuals that were in the apartment into custody. The King and the

    Read More

  • The Court Case: Mcculloch V. Maryland

    811 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the controversial court case, McCulloch v. Maryland, Chief Justice John Marshall’s verdict gave Congress the implied powers to carry out any laws they deemed to be “necessary and proper” to the state of the Union. In this 1819 court case, the state of Maryland tried to sue James McCulloch, a cashier at the Second Bank of the United States, for opening a branch in Baltimore. McCulloch refused to pay the tax and therefore the issue was brought before the courts; the decision would therefore change the way Americans viewed the Constitution to this day.

    Read More

  • Essay On Gay Rights

    1342 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the recent history of America, gay marriage has always been an issue. With the different views and morals everyone has on the subject, it makes it hard for individual states to determine what side they should be on. In 1983 a Harvard Law School student, Evan Wolfson, wrote a thesis stating the rule of marriage equality. Justices concluded that gay couples were entitled to the legal benefits of civil marriage; and most crucially in the Supreme Judicial Court in Massachusetts, whose favorable ruling, in a suit by lawyer Mary Bonauto and the Boston-based Gay and Lesbian Advocated and Defenders, led to the nation’s first bona fide same-sex marriages…” (“Gay Marriage turns 10 and Credit Should Be Spread around- The Boston Globe). On May 17, 2004 Massachusetts became the first state to legalize gay marriages. In June of 2013, California legalized gay marriages, which helped their large LGBT (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered) community. (“History and Timeline of the Freedom…”). When this finally happened, it was seen as a great achievement by Karmala Harris, a California Attorney. “This is a profound day in our country, and its just the right thing: ‘Justice is finally being served’” (“Court Gives OK for California Gay Marriages”).

    Read More

  • Bias In Gladstone's 'Great Refusal'

    1751 Words  | 4 Pages

    Orwell’s rule and Gladstone’s bias both apply to Chris Pleasance’s report about the Kim Davis. Pleasance reports that a current social issue, which Kim Davis, a country clerk, uses religious liberty to defend for herself. Undoubtedly, Kim Davis becomes a national spotlight across the nation. In the article, Pleasance points out that “since

    Read More

  • Obergefell V. Hodges: Case Analysis

    1298 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is important, of course, to note that the Supreme Court was not able to immediately create and implement desegregation policy, because the Court does face constraints in the area of local implementation. However, the Brown decision was crucial for the success of the desegregation movement, because it supported the Civil Rights Act and provided a precedent for later decisions like Green that would help to implement the ruling at the district level. The courts were thus able to make decisions in this policy area that profoundly shaped the way that civil rights policy developed in the United States, as the courts were enabled to create successful policy in the area of school desegregation because of the combined influence of federal court

    Read More

  • Texas v. Johnson Argumentative

    691 Words  | 2 Pages

    To this day, Americans have many rights and privileges. Rights stated in the United States constitution may be simple and to the point, but the rights Americans have may cause debate to whether or not something that happens in society, is completely reasonable. The Texas v. Johnson case created much debate due to a burning of the American Flag. One may say the burning of the flag was tolerable because of the rights citizens of the United States have, another may say it was not acceptable due to what the American flag symbolizes for America. (Brennan and Stevens 1). Johnson was outside of his First Amendment rights, and the burning of the American flag was unjust due to what the flag means to America.

    Read More

  • Lawrence V. Texas

    1308 Words  | 3 Pages

    The report was filed by the 41-year-old neighbor Roger David Nance and he has already been accused before for the similar complaints. The above cause to enter the house, however, was not considered to be the issue in the case hearing and Nance admitted that he provided false evidence. Position of petitioners Lawrence and Gardner were charged in the violation of the anti-sodomy Texas homosexual conduct law.... ... middle of paper ...

    Read More

  • The Fourteenth Amendment

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    Overall, the ruling in this case was a perfect interpretation of the Constitution. Despite opposition claiming that it is not addressed in the Constitution, too few rights are ever addressed in the Constitution of the United States. That is why there is a thing called Judicial Review. By utilizing judicial review, the interpreters of the law –Supreme Court, may make changes to policies and laws. Abortion, medicinal marijuana, and marriage fall under the umbrella of Equal Protection since they correspond to the rights and liberties of US citizens.

    Read More

  • Loving V Virginia Essay

    716 Words  | 2 Pages

    The U.S. has recognized marriage as a basic human right by many court cases including Loving v Virginia. Since protecting the marriage of a black-Cherokee woman and a white man, the case has also helped support the legalization of same-sex marriage in all 50 states. This is important because it creates a more united America by knocking down social constraints that disallowed the 5-10% of America identified as homosexual from being married. In the same way as blacks were not allowed to vote, gay couples were not allowed to marry. The legalization of same-sex marriage is helping bridge the split in social order of America by not outlawing same-sex couples for being “immoral” and implying the couples are less-deserving of marriage than a heterosexual relationship. The change of expanding the 14th amendment’s meaning of equal protection of rights for all citizens, in this case for marriage, is helping people treat each other as equivalent and allowing the country to take another step towards liberty and justice for

    Read More

  • Obergefell V. 28 Case Study

    701 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alito. Since the U.S. Constitution does not address same sex marriage I believe that the decision whether for or against marriage equality should have been one reserved to the state's democratic process (Obergefell Oyez). Nevertheless, since the law was passed and a clash of rights arose because of the positive verdict on marriage equality I believe that public officials like Kim Davis have sworn to execute the law, and if the law states that she must issue marriage licenses she should issue them. Indeed, she is an elected official, which prevents her from simply being fired for not complying. The right and liberties awarded to citizens of this country are not absolute; therefore public officials must adhere to the government’s decisions because ultimately the government is their employer. Limits must be placed on religious freedoms when they are in direct conflict with current law. Surprisingly I learned that only 22 states have laws that protect against discrimination based on sex orientation in the areas of employment and housing (Margolin). I argue that it is crucial for all states to issue these essential protections because of the implicit rights stated in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments supporting equality in various aspects (Roland)`. All in all I see that Americans are suffering on both ends of the spectrum and some balance needs to be met in order to best

    Read More

  • Loving v. Virginia (388 U.S. 1)

    2066 Words  | 5 Pages

    On July 11, 1958 a couple of hours after midnight, Richard Loving a white man and Mildred Loving an African American woman were awakened to the presence of three officers in their bedroom. One of the three officers demanded from Richard to identify the woman next to him. Mildred, full of fear, told the officers that she was his wife, while Richard pointed to the marriage license on the wall. The couple was then charged and later found guilty in violation of the state's anti-miscegenation statute.

    Read More

  • Elizabeth Cady Stanton's Use of Rhetorical Devices in a Women's Speech

    639 Words  | 2 Pages

    Stanton argues many valid points with significant impact. Throughout her speech, she uses many examples of logical appeals. She states, “The question is now: how shall we get possession of what rightfully belongs to us?” In this quote, Stanton is agitating the question of when women are going to get not only the rights they deserve, but also the equality they demand. She is disgracing the rules that they live under, and questioning when things will be set right. She also argues, “All white men in this country have the same rights, however they may differ in mind, body, or estate.” All white men in America at this time had freedom no matter what they owned or what their background. They could be rich, wealthy businessmen or poor country farmers, and as much as they differed in society standards, they all shared one common thing: their rights. She is making an emotional appeal to the women of the country, and exposing the anger of the unfair situation the women are stuck in. One of the key phrases she repeats is, “The right is ours.” Stanton repeats this short, yet powerful, phrase in order to get her message through. She believes and fights that all free women should be just as equal as all free men. The use of repeating this phrase helps others understand how dearly ...

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gay Rights

    1017 Words  | 3 Pages

    Being so advanced technologically, it is surprising how America is still so behind on the issue of same-sex marriage. The United States should push aside the religious argument in this debate, and truly separate its church and state as it claims to do so. From its slow beginning to the rapid increase of support in the 70’s, homosexual marriage has been a controversial debate that hopefully will end in the near future.

    Read More

  • The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)

    895 Words  | 2 Pages

    The ruling of Baehr vs. Lewin was a victory for gay rights activists, hope for other states searching for the same freedom, and disappointment for opponents of same-sex marriage. Yet this victory was short lived (until complete legalization in November 13, 2013) since the state appealed the lower court’s decis...

    Read More

  • Rights for Homosexuals

    753 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gay marriage is a hotly debated issue in today's society. Andrew Sullivan and William Bennett offer opposing views in the June 3, 1996 edition of Newsweek. Sullivan's article, “Let Gays Marry,” offers several arguments supporting the issues of same sex marriage. Bennett counters in his article, “Leave Marriage Alone,” that same sex marriages would be damaging to the sanctity of marriage. Each author presents several reasons for the positions they defend and bring up valid points to defend their opinions. William Bennett and Andrew Sullivan share a mutual respect for the values and sacredness of the bond of marriage. Their disagreements stem from who they believe should be allowed to marry.

    Read More

More about Analysis Of Obergefell V. Hodges

Open Document