Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of the nineteenth-century female in literature
Women literature in america
Portrayal of women in literature in the 1800s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The primary literary strategy in Emily Dickinson’s My Life Had Stood a Loaded Gun , is a metaphor of a gun and its master which is used to represent a wife and her husband. This poem is about the objectification and lack of agency in women in the 19th century. The gun/hunter metaphor is the the argument. In the poem, the woman is literally reduced to an object which is at the disposal of the hunter/master/husband.
In this poem, a reader is faced with the challenge of identifying who the speaker is and who the gun metaphorically represents (Forman). To help solve this riddle, Angela Estes asks, “For whom in the nineteenth century would pleasure and power be problematic should they be expressed?”(XX). A female speaker is the most obvious and workable answer. If the speaker is a woman, than Estes asserts that the poem is “the plight of a speaker who is dependent on the actions of another for the release of power.” Because power and a strong will are traditionally characterized as masculine qualities, it would be difficult for a woman in the 19th century to express these characteristics without appearing as if she has lost touch with her femininity (Estes, X). Society pressures women to be passive and can look down on women who have a strong will and are powerful. Therefore, women could only express power and will in conjunction with their husband's power and will. This is symbolized by how the gun can only expresses its explosive power and its will to kill when the hunter pulls the trigger. The gun is literally unable to express itself or act on its own because it is an inanimate object. By metaphorical extension, the poem is showing us how women are forced to become like inanimate objects, discouraged from expressing their desires...
... middle of paper ...
...or the gun's sake, they are valued for what they can do. In other words, they are valued for the extrinsic or instrumental value and not for any intrinsic value. When the gun metaphorically stands for a wife, it implies that she too is only valued for her extrinsic or instrumental value and not for her intrinsic value. If the hunter only values the gun because it gives him the power to kill, than on the other side of the metaphor the husband only values the wife for what she can do for him and he does not value her for who she is.
The gun and hunter metaphor is used to represent a relationship between and husband and wife where the power dynamics are uneven. By using a metaphor where the woman is an inanimate object, it illustrates her lack of agency and objectification because she is represented by something which does not have agency and is literally an object.
In her younger ages, she used a gun for entertainment, she loved to hunt with her father. The author was educated and taught about guns, by her father because of the unsaddling event of her grandmother and mother on highway 66 when the three men that were trying to run them off the road for the large cash amount that was used for cashing payroll checks for the miners. As she got older her gun was there for protection and security. She was more assured with it that she would be able to protect herself.
Many people have heard that having a gun makes you a man, so Dave believes that purchasing a gun would help him become one. The gun represents power, masculinity, independence, and respect, which are all things that Dave wants. The idea of owning a gun is David’s outlet, a way to quickly become more powerful and manly. The feeling of having a gun in his possession was to prevent others around him from looking at him as just a little boy. With the gun, Dave felt invincible, as if no harm could come his way and as if he is on top of the
Ballard cares for his firearm just as much as his stuffed animals. Throughout the novel, other characters continuously witness the gun wrapped around him. Since he has “had that rifle from when he was just almost a boy”, it could represent more than a deadly weapon, but a family figure that decides to stay with him (57). Ballard...
The excerpt of “A Peaceful Woman Explains Why She Carries A Gun” is a personal account from Linda Hasselstrom on why she feels the need to carry a gun as well as, why other women should feel the need to own a gun. Hasselstrom uses rhetorical appeals in order to justify her means of security, however she fails due to her inability to provide a substantial amount of background knowledge.
Linda M. Hasselstrom wrote the article “A Peaceful Woman Explains Why she Carries a Gun,” she has a credible argument for carrying a gun because she has experienced many dangerous sexual assaults. Hasselstrom is a journalist who has gun ownership. The audience of this article is the women who want to protect themselves. In the article, Hasselstrom describes many sexual assaults, and she shows that women are always the victims. After that, Hasselstrom explains how she can protect herself by learning kung fu and carrying a gun.
Wright uses symbolism in the story as to which the gun that Dave wants to buy, symbolizes him being a man. He wants to feel that power, he wants to mean something, and he wants to feel strong and free. Dave Saunders was the man that was almost
The gun is the personification of the owner. In reality, the gun does not roam the woods, hunt doe, or protect its master. Without a human using it, a gun simply sits lifelessly on a shelf. It's the man who roams the woods, hunts doe, and protects himself with the gun. The poem makes it sound as if man and gun are a team. By first person person plural pronouns such as, “We roam,” “We Hunt,” “Our good Day,” in the poem makes it clear that the gun and owner share their life, spending time and doing everything together. It says that the “Owner passed” the ...
From reading a little further, the readers can catch a glimpse of the gender of the intellectual voice. “…handful of guns and recognized the absurdity of the whole night and of the simple yet confoundingly complex arrangement of hope and desire, fear and hate...” This voice speaking to us is that of an educated female. The quote “…absurdity of the whole night …” leads the reader to believe that she is a ‘thinker’, someone who continually ponders past events. Most people would not try to recall memories of the past unless an event occurred that was very memorable and/or distasteful. The narrator focuses on the tiniest of descriptions and elaborates, but speaks in a way as to let the readers know she has had a formal education. A male would rather speak of an exact number of guns, rather than comment on the amount as that of being a “handful”. A male would also not describe the events of the night with such word choices as “hope and desire”, and would no...
In his article “Our Blind Spot about Guns,” Nicholas Kristof argues for making guns safer for the people who use them by bringing up the comparison of guns to cars; “Cars don’t kill people. People kill people,” (261). Kristof’s purpose is to address the fact that guns are not as safe as they should be and are the cause of thousands of deaths each year. Although his ideas for increasing gun safety are interesting, there is a shortcoming in the comparisons he used. In order to make a stronger argument, one must use literary devices. In this case, Kristof used ethos, pathos, logos, and additional rhetorical devices.
In “Get A Knife, Get A Dog, But Get Rid Of Guns,” Molly Ivins believes in strict gun control among citizens who are not armed forces or badged members of the society. Ivins supports the Second Amendment, but takes it literally and word for word. She believes that people can get killed easier cleaning guns than knives. The author compares gun killing to automobile killings and how you have to be licensed to drive them but we do not regulate guns. Ivins does not believe that people are using guns to hunt and put food on the table, instead they are using them for harmful reasons. She thinks that guns should be left to the people that have extensive training and discipline. Ivins’ thought is that a dog should be protection enough for everyone.
In Dickinson’s “MyLife Had Stood—A Loaded Gun”, was viewed literally, thinking the poem was regarding a gun and its owner. After reading the poem over and over again the reader picks up on the emotions the writer portrays. Dickinson’s poetry carries deep emotion with her personal life and views. She uses the gun to speak out everything masculine: “Loaded Gun” (1) cruel not pleasant, “hunt the Doe” (6) kills not...
Guns are powerful weapons. They have the ability to kill, destroy, and harm whomever or whatever the bullet comes in contact with. Experts estimate that about one-third of all American households contain firearms, and that the total number of guns in circulation is at least 240 million. Approximately one-third of these are handguns,
“Here bullet” is a poem by Brian Turner in which the persona is struggling to coup with the situation in which he finds himself. In this poem the persona is able to establish the low point in which they have reached with lines such as “If a body is what you want, / Then here is bone and gristle and flesh.” (LL 1-2). This line establishes right from the onset of the poem that the persona is at wits in. The poem could leave a first time reader of it wondering how the persona reached this point. This point in which the persona is fantasying about death with lines like “Here is where I complete the word you bring/ Hissing through the air, here is where I moan” (LL 10-11).
In Emily Dickinson’s dramatic monolog “My Life had stood – a Loaded Gun,” a journey of a spiritual awakening is expressed. Dickinson writes about how a child of God is found then goes out to find other lost souls. Literary Critic Gregory Palmerino indicates “‘My Life had stood – a Loaded Gun’ maybe Dickinson’s most expansive poem if not her magnum opus, yet I do believe there is a discernible meaning – a center – to be found there. That center is her struggle with God” (84). Dickinson develops her poem using sound, symbolism, and figurative language.
Literary Analysis of Emily Dickinson's Poetry. Emily Dickinson is one of the most famous authors in American history, and a good amount of that can be attributed to her uniqueness in writing. In Emily Dickinson's poem 'Because I could not stop for Death,' she characterizes her overarching theme of Death differently than it is usually described through the poetic devices of irony, imagery, symbolism, and word choice. Emily Dickinson likes to use many different forms of poetic devices and Emily's use of irony in poems is one of the reasons they stand out in American poetry. In her poem 'Because I could not stop for Death,' she refers to 'Death' in a good way.