Macbeth: Villain or Victim of Circumstances?

1000 Words2 Pages

Many directors, actors, and audience members have different opinions regarding to the titular character of William Shakespeare’s Macbeth. Harold Bloom, author of Bloom’s Guides: Macbeth, states his belief that “Macbeth is a villain, indeed a monster of murderousness.” (Bloom 7). Indeed even Macbeth’s rival, Macduff, calls him a “rare monster.” (Macbeth 1.5.76-78) It is ironic then that some directors, such as Roman Polanski, allows Macbeth to be periodically dressed in white. It would have been more fitting for Macbeth to be dressed in a black (or darker) costume, like in Trevor Nun’s interpretation, or in a black and white costume, like Michael Bogdandov’s interpretation. For Macbeth loses his innocence …show more content…

For he writes, “I thought good to deliver thee…that thou might not lose the dues of rejoicing by being ignorant of what greatness is promised thee.” (1.5.10-13) His statement may have only been meant as an encouragement or a promise that the future looks bright for them. However, Lady Macbeth may have been just as envious of the throne as Macbeth and is quick to suggest to Macbeth to lose his innocence. In reference to preparing for Duncan’s arrival she suggests, “Bear welcome in your eye…Look like the innocent flower but be the serpent under it.” (1.5.75-78) Macbeth seems to brush off Lady Macbeth’s ‘command’ by commenting that they would speak …show more content…

She accuses him of, “Liv(ing like) a coward…letting ‘I dare not’ wait upon ‘I would’ like the poor cat in the adage.” (1.7.46-9) It is here that Macbeth’s innocent barrier is breached, for his response is, “If we fail?” (1.7.68) But it isn’t until he is tempted by himself that the barrier is destroyed. Take for example the dinner scene with King Duncan and company. Though Shakespeare doesn’t have much to say as to the events of the dinner, Polanski provides a piece of evidence in how Macbeth tempts himself. Malcom, who King Duncan decided to name his heir instead of Macbeth, makes Macbeth pour his drink. Macbeth may have taken this gesture as a forced submission that someone younger and inexperienced may soon be king. This could have also provoked Macbeth’s feelings of anger and envy towards King Duncan. The final straw to break Macbeth’s back though is his vision of the dagger in 2.1. It could be argued that Macbeth recognized that he was angry about how his prophecy was not yet complete, but taking any action to fulfill it on his own would be fatal. “Art thou not a fatal vision? ... Or art thou but a dagger of the mind…proceeding from a heat-oppressed brain?” (2.1.48-51) But in the end, Macbeth allows his anger and envy to consume him as the bell rings. This signifies the end of Macbeth’s white innocence as he begins to travel down a dark road of

More about Macbeth: Villain or Victim of Circumstances?

Open Document