The intention of both articles is to present a stand on nuclear power. The first article states the benefits of nuclear power: “The use of nuclear power in place of other energy sources helps to keep the air clean, preserve the Earth’s climate, avoid ground-level ozone formation and prevent acid rain” (2008, Nuclear, p.64). As one can see, the intent of the first article is to describe how nuclear power is cleaner than coal-fired power plants. However, the second article has a different goal: “There are four insurmountable problems with nuclear power.” (Pope, 2009, p.64). The second article goes straight to the point stating that there are four reasons why nuclear power is bad. The two articles have clear statement of intention, which appeals to logos; however, looking into supporting details, one can find more diversity in ways that the authors appeal to logos, ethos, and pathos.
The supporting details determine if the writers are appealing to logos (facts), ethos (credibility), and pathos (emotion). In the first article, it uses pathos and ethos to de-emphasizing coal-f...
... middle of paper ...
...destruction into the mind of the reader. Between the two articles, one can see that both articles convey words that catch the reader’s eyes in imagination and feeling.
Looking at the first and second articles, one can conclude that that the first article has better supporting details than the second one, the paragraph structure is better in the second article rather than the first, and the wording is neutral in both articles. Comparing the first article to the second, one can say the first article is better because it appealed to logos and ethos to persuade the reader, whereas the second article appealed to logos and pathos flawing Pope’s argument. One can see that article two has better organization with the use of a thesis, whereas article one has scattered thoughts without a clear thesis. The words in both articles catch the reads eyes in imagination and feeling.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... Furthermore, the article suggest that reprocessing will lead to the construction of more low-level nuclear facilities (paragraph eight, ucsusa.org, 04/05/2011), which points more facilities are going to be builted unnecessarily, leading to the contamination of more land. The idea of nuclear power facilities to recycle their waste hurts the enviroment. By recycling nuclear waste, it contributes to the contamination of the planet by adding more nuclear hazard. The waste that keeps on pilling on is that of uranium and plutonium which are two substance that takes a long period of time to stop being radioactive.... [tags: energy, research, environment, terrorism]
1462 words (4.2 pages)
- Nuclear Energy in Japan Did you know only 70 miles away from Japan’s capital city Tokyo lived a “Nuclear Valley”, encompassing more than 15 nuclear power plants. This valley was bound for success and energy delivery, until in 1999 everything went south. The Tokaimura incident is one of many nuclear catastrophes in Japan making citizens unhappy [Cont. Japan]. What is Japan’s current situation in relation to nuclear energy today. The late 1990’s was a boom in Japan’s electrical output with the help of the very first Nuclear Power plant built in the Tokai area the power plant generated up to 27.7 Billion Kilowatt hours of energy in its 2 years of up-time [ inis.iaea.org].... [tags: Nuclear power, Nuclear fission, Nuclear fusion]
1204 words (3.4 pages)
- Let’s imagine that we are on a freeway. Just a few miles over the horizon lies the ultimate consumption of our planet’s fossil fuel supply. Before we reach this inevitable destination, there are several exits we can turn off of to potentially delay losing the energy sources from which we primarily rely. The names of these turn-offs are familiar: solar, nuclear, wind, and hydroelectric. While all of these have been implemented to different extents, only nuclear power provides a solid and practical solution to the looming energy crisis.... [tags: Nuclear power, Energy development, Nuclear fission]
1226 words (3.5 pages)
- The Safety of Nuclear Power When it comes to nuclear power, many people have sharply divided opinions. Some claim that it holds the potential to replace more traditional fuel sources, such as coal, in an ecologically friendly way. Others, however, claim that it is expensive and dangerous and has the power to cause mass destruction to countless people. The question remains: is nuclear power a safe and effective alternative to traditional fuel sources. What is nuclear power. According to “Nuclear Power 101” from the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), “nuclear power is an energy technology that harnesses the powerful forces that hold together the nucleus of an atom.” This energy is released b... [tags: Nuclear power, Nuclear fission]
703 words (2 pages)
- Energy is the most important produce for our survival of our society. With energy, we can have water and food, and we need energy for all our services like light, heat and power that we use. To keep stop burning the fossil fuels of coal, oil and gas which make our environment bad, the research found our energy comes from 80% burning of hydrocarbons. Global problem issues such as climate change or global warming well lead us to the extinction of many plant and animals. By Second World, War scientist explored an amazing power, new sources of power are nuclear power.... [tags: Nuclear power, Nuclear fission, Uranium]
1454 words (4.2 pages)
- Imagine for a moment that the world’s most adept minds came together and engineered a modus and a device that could produce an unfathomable amount of energy. What if this method not only outputted more energy than a mountain of coal, but it harnessed this energy utilizing the smallest forms of matter in the universe. What if this machine could propel behemoths crafted from steel while simultaneously leaving behind less of an impact on the ecosystem than crude oil. What if this process, after half a century of maturing, could lead mankind to obtaining the means of unlimited power.... [tags: Nuclear power, Nuclear fission, Uranium]
1017 words (2.9 pages)
- With the election season coming up our country current policies are being looked at by many new candidates and the one elected can change them. One of the more important issues the country has to look into is climate change and our reliance on fossil fuels. One option to help these issues that the current candidates don’t even consider is nuclear power, an excellent but not infinite clean energy source. The US has been doing experiments with nuclear power for decades but now only a few countries worldwide use it majorly.... [tags: Nuclear power, Nuclear fission, Energy security]
1714 words (4.9 pages)
- Nuclear power has been envisioned as the future of humanity, yet on April 26th 1986, the Chernobyl power station illustrated to the world of the possible devastations of nuclear power. Radioactive clouds spread across neighboring countries like Russia, Poland, Bulgaria, and ruined nearby forestry, bodies of water, and wildlife living amongst now contaminated landscape. While it may be the most cost-effective way to produce electricity, nuclear power stations hold an everlasting danger of another potential meltdown.... [tags: Chernobyl disaster, Nuclear power, Nuclear fission]
1221 words (3.5 pages)
- In recent years with the rapid development of society the natural resources in the world are being consumed at an alarming rate. As these resources reduce, people have been looking for another resource to replace them. The result by contrast with hydraulic power, wind, nuclear power and another way that the nuclear power can be proven that it is a stable and efficient energy resource. This essay will argue that nuclear power is a suitable source for energy generation. It will focus on the efficient of nuclear fuel, environmental protection and economic impacts.... [tags: Coal, Nuclear power, Energy development]
1120 words (3.2 pages)
- “Where does our power come from?”, when asked, many people would not know the answer to this question. Some might say wind, water, or solar, but the main provider of America’s power are coal plants and nuclear reactors running to keep the lights on. Unfortunately, there is no free energy, it comes with a cost to the environment and its inhabitants. So when the choice arises to change the way humanity looks at our consumption of power, why chose the way we do things. Because the time has come for us as a country and the world to make the switch from the old to the new.... [tags: Nuclear power, Coal, Chernobyl disaster]
1966 words (5.6 pages)