Rhetorical Analysis Of Nuclear Waste By Richard Muller
analytical Essay
1997 words
The article “Nuclear Waste” is an interesting perspective from Richard Muller. Muller is a very credited author and he speaks his mind about the situation where people are trying to figure out how to deal with nuclear waste around the U.S. There are many proposed ideas but Muller has a very simple and straight forward idea that he believes is the ideal decision. The essay he wrote can be interpreted in different ways but his motive for writing is very clear. Muller’s background is quite impressive because he is highly credited. When reading Muller’s essay, you notice points that supports his argument and truth about the situation around nuclear power. He brings his outlook on the situation to the audience and conveys that viewpoint convincingly. …show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how muller appeals to his audience while criticizing the government. he feels that the nuclear problem has an easy solution, which is putting it in yucca mountain.
- Analyzes how muller is a reliable source for information on the nuclear waste because of his huge credibility.
- Analyzes how muller's argument has a lot to do with the problems the us is facing. he believes there are bigger problems to deal with, such as global warming.
- Analyzes how muller questions the government's agenda towards nuclear waste. he sees it as a huge waste of time and money.
- Analyzes how the government is concerned about other elements that may make the nuclear waste in yucca mountain unsafe.
- Opines that muller's essay was well done and executed. he supported his argument with facts and formed his opinion.
- Analyzes how richard muller's article "nuclear waste" is an interesting perspective on the situation around nuclear waste around the us.
- Analyzes how muller's essay is riveting because of a balance in the rhetorical triangle.
The audience he is trying to convince while criticizing is the government. He feels as if the nuclear problem has an easy solution, which is putting it in Yucca Mountain. Muller feels as if his idea is the best idea yet and unmatched. Muller says that “waste leakage from Yucca Mountain is not a great danger” (258) While he states other issues for example in Colorado, where radioactive material is very close to some sources for drinking water. He is saying that the danger of putting the nuclear waste in Yucca Mountain is 20 times less than the danger in the Colorado River. Muller also points out how the government is making this problem with the nuclear waste such a big deal. They make it seem so dangerous, which makes the people think it is dangerous. This causes the people to worry about the danger of the nuclear waste, when in reality the danger is not great. Instead there are other problems that are more detrimental, but the government is not giving it the attention it needs. In the essay Muller writes that “Raise the standards, increase the safety, do more research, study the problem in greater depth, and in the process you will improve safety and frighten the public” (Muller 259) He says this near the end of his …show more content…
He gives facts to back it up. “The underground tunnels at Yucca Mountain are designed to hold 77,000 tons of high-level nuclear waste.” (Muller 255) It is obvious that Muller just wants people to see how insignificant the debate of nuclear waste is. He talks about greater problems as I stated about Colorado but to be more in depth about that situation Muller says “water that runs through, around, and over this radioactive rock is the source of the Colorado River, which is used for drinking water in much of the West, including Los Angeles and San Diego.” (Muller 257) There are prominent problems that need to be assisted and taken care of. Spending so much time and money on nuclear waste is just squandering
Related
- explanatory
- analytical
- argumentative
- America Needs Nuclear Powerexplanatory essay...t problem of nuclear power and it is probably the most well-managed waste in the history of the United States. This essay is not attempting to present nuclear as the perfect answer to the increased demand for power. Nuclear is not perfect, however, of the options available it comes the closest.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that nuclear energy is produced from the nuclear fission reaction of uranium absorbing a neutron after which it splits into two fragments of nearly equal mass.
- Explains that hydroelectric is good for the environment, but location specific. oil has a finite supply, high cost, and the emission of carbon dioxide.
- Explains cohen, bernard l., the nuclear energy option: an alternative for the 90s.
- Explains that nuclear power plants are a safe, clean, and reliable source of energy production. nuclear costs less and is environmentally cleaner than coal, which supplies approximately fifty percent of the power in the us.
- Explains that environmentalists argue against nuclear power on the grounds of the danger of radiation emitted by nuclear reactors and nuclear waste, and that renewables are a better, cleaner option.
- Explains that radiation is a dangerous emission, which can damage biological cells, cause cancer, or cause genetic defects in later generations.
1974 wordsRead More - Nuclear Waste Disposalexplanatory essayThis is an important issue in the United States today because many people still fear nuclear waste because of what has happened at Chernobyl. They are afraid t...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that nuclear waste is a growing concern in the united states and throughout the world.
- Explains why this issue is in hot debate in the united states. residents who live in peaceful communities don't want these dangerous and hazardous materials to end up in their communities.
- Opines that this is an important issue in the united states today because many people still fear nuclear waste because of what has happened at chernobyl.
- Explains that nuclear waste does not always cause harmful pollution into rivers or water. meentinny west, rockchapel, was raided by gardai after a two-week surveillance operation.
- Explains that the energy department has 800,000 gallons of nuclear waste stored at the idaho national engineering and environmental laboratory.
- Explains that waste can cause many problems that people are not really aware of, such as poor air quality in a nearby residential neighborhood.
- Explains that under bush's plan to store nuclear waste at yucca mountain, hundreds of thousands of gallons would have to travel through chicago on its route to nevada.
- Explains that the caribbean sea and the islands are worried about the transportation of spent nuclear fuel and waste. they believe an accident would lower tourism and decrease the fishing industries.
- States that they strongly support the idea of nuclear waste being a major hazard to the quality of human life.
- Opines that people who are in favor of nuclear waste need to wake up and realize that it is dangerous.
- States that antigua-waste caribbean worried about nuclear waste shipments. energy dept. sued over nuclear waste.
1482 wordsRead More - Nuclear Energy Essayexplanatory essayOut of options On and off, could it be that simple? Energy is there whenever we need it, so we think. It’s not as simple as turning the light switch, replacing light bulbs, and paying the electric bills. Our energy today is made mostly from coal, natural gas, oil, wind, solar, and nuclear.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that energy is there whenever we need it, so we think. with depleting natural resources, we must begin to consider what will power our future.
- Explains that the entire nuclear energy process starts with uranium. uranium is the fuel for the nuclear reactors, often harvested near coal mines.
- Explains the process of harvesting energy from atoms is complicated and has many variables. the fission process causes a chain reaction within the uranium rods releasing heat.
- Explains that many scientists and citizens are worried about the nuclear industry after the fukushima nuclear meltdown.
- Explains that after the catastrophic event at fukushima, the nuclear regulatory commission (nrc) has increased safety requirements on current and new reactors.
- Explains that nuclear waste is a highly radioactive substance that can be leaked into the environment. re-processing is an efficient way to dispose of the used uranium, but it is expensive and many countries have not yet adapted to it.
- Explains that scientists have been trying to find new ways to process or resolve the issue of nuclear waste. they suggest interim storage facilities in regional areas around the world, where counties can ship their waste to a facility that will be safe and allow access for further research.
- Explains that the cost of running a nuclear reactor is extremely high, causing many concerns in the industry and for the companies running it.
- Explains that economics decides what society needs and determines if nuclear reactors play a role. the u.s. has spent billions investing in nuclear power plants but due to tight regulation and concerns with this type of energy, only five of those projects have broken ground.
- Explains that nuclear reactors are unpredictable. they can last over 25 years or meltdown within 2 years. the three mile island 2 reactor melt down is another case of unreliability.
- Opines that nuclear energy isn't needed in our society, and that the rising prices of natural gas and coal have many turning to a different source.
- Opines that nuclear energy is a complicated and opinionated matter, where many variables come into play. the meltdowns should have been avoided by upgrading old reactors and triple checking power plants.
- Opines that nuclear power has a possibility of being part of our future energy source. it will most likely be accompanied by wind, solar, and other small sustainable and renewable sources.
2004 wordsRead More - Ethos, Pathos and Nuclear Energyanalytical essayEthos, Pathos and Nuclear Energy Something always curious and provoking happens in science writing. Gwyneth Cravens is an author of five novels and many publications, and one who studies a topic in great detail. She creates an enormous work about nuclear energy for the last decade. Cravens’s research in her last published book titled Power to Save the World: The Truth About Nuclear Energy has led her to do an about-face on the issue. In her article “Better Energy” which was published in May 2008 in Discover magazine, she disputes and claims that nuclear energy is currently best alternative and should be considered as our future energy source.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how gwyneth cravens' research on nuclear energy has led her to do an about-face on the issue.
- Analyzes how cravens focuses on creating her ethos or credibility as a writer to support her thesis.
- Analyzes how cravens appeals to her audience with her impressive use of pathos. she creates a bond between herself and the audience by finding something in common.
- Analyzes how cravens' argument is well composed and uses ethos and pathos, but lacks some points in opposition.
- Analyzes how cravens uses her creative techniques of pathos and ethos to persuade her audience through her strong assumptions and facts of evidence from her researched work.
1278 wordsRead More - Nuclear Waste Essayanalytical essayNuclear Waste Since the dawn of civilization, all living (and some non-living) things have needed energy. When humans discovered fire, the first form of harnessed energy, it made it easier to stay warm, prepare food, make weapons, etc. Since then, humankind has been inventing new ways to harness energy and use it to our advantage. Now-a-days, people in most nations depend extremely heavily on fossil fuels – to work, travel, regulate temperature of homes, produce food, clothing, and furniture, as well as other power industries. Not only are these fossil fuels dominating our society and creating economic vulnerability, but they also produce waste that causes a number of social and environmental concerns.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that people depend heavily on fossil fuels to work, travel, regulate temperature of homes, produce food, clothing, and furniture, as well as other alternative sustainable energy sources.
- Explains that marie curie's discovery of radioactivity was key to discovering radioactive elements, while james chadwick discovered fission, the splitting of a nucleus into smaller fragments by bombarding it with neutrons.
- Explains that 98.3% of uranium ore is u-238 (not fissionable) and only 0.7% of u-235 (fission-able). the radioactive decay of nuclear waste emits alpha, beta, and gamma radiation.
- Explains that nuclear energy yields 2.7 million times more energy than coal per gram. nuclear waste is expensive and dangerous to dispose of because of its radioactivity.
- Argues that nuclear plants and waste storage are disproportionately sited near rural communities where the voices of residents are ignored.
- Explains the environmental impacts of nuclear waste, such as radioactive emissions, heat released into the air, and hot water. nuclear waste does not produce harmful air pollutants like ash, sulfur dioxide and greenhouse gases.
1237 wordsRead More - The Consequences of Continued Use of Nuclear Power Plants in the USAexplanatory essayOne needs to pay attention to the fact that the problems are possible not only in case of nuclear accidents. It is about the issue of the disposal nuclear waste. Increasing the amount of nuclear waste and reducing the size of the territories for their burial will make the United States face a vexed problem, because currently the elaboration of nuclear waste is not possible. The U.S. government should first promote the research aimed to find alternative ways to deal with energy shortages. Based on the fact that, despite its advantages, nuclear power might lead to catastrophic consequences of not local, but a global scale, it is necessary to seek for the solutions that will ensure minimal harm to human health and the natural balance of ecosystems.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that nuclear energy is the energy contained in the nucleus and released in nuclear reactions.
- Explains the huge energy consumption of fuel. 1 kilogram of uranium enriched to 4%, with full burn up releases energy equivalent to burning of about 100 tons of coal
- Explains the reusability of fuel (after regeneration). unlike ash and slag of fossil fuel, uranium 235 may be used a couple of times.
- Explains that nuclear power does not contribute to the greenhouse effect. nuclear power plants in europe help to avoid emissions of 700 million tons of co2.
- Opines that nuclear power is a promising target for investment despite the recent tragic events in japan and the splash of public distrust to the "peaceful atom."
- Explains that advanced industrial countries began to design and build nuclear power plants with different types of reactors.
- Explains the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy, such as the low dependence on transportation of fuels, and the fact that it does not require the construction of expensive facilities.
- Explains that nuclear power provides minimal emissions of carbon dioxide, sulfur and nitrogen oxides, which are known to be harmful to human health.
- Explains that nuclear energy has serious disadvantages, such as the disposal of radioactive nuclear waste stations.
- Concludes that nuclear energy has its merits against the background of the growth of energy consumption and reducing the amount of organic resources such as oil.
2660 wordsRead More - Nuclear Energy Essayargumentative essayFor decades, the world has been struggling about determining whether or not to utilize nuclear energy. From 1985, when American Cold War fears stifled nuclear technology applications for power, to 2011, when the Japanese Fukishima nuclear incident resulted in many anti-nuclear sentiments, emphasis has never been placed on the potential benefits that nuclear energy poses. These sentiments include the ideas that nuclear power poses numerous threats to people and the environment, including consequences of uranium mining, processing and transport, nuclear weapons proliferation or sabotage, and of radioactive nuclear waste; reactors, due to their complexities, are more likely to fail and cause disasters.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the world has been struggling about determining whether or not to utilize nuclear energy. from 1985, when american cold war fears stifled nuclear technology applications for power, to 2011, the japanese fukishima nuclear incident resulted in many anti-nuclear sentiments.
- Explains that nuclear power is a sustainable energy source that reduces carbon emissions, produces virtually no air pollution, and increases energy security.
- Compares the benefits of nuclear energy with other energy sources to see why it is an attractive option.
- Explains that fossil fuel plants require enormous amounts of coal and other fuels. hydroelectric dams are suspect to environmental change, and wind turbines produce electricity. nuclear energy provides reliability and efficiency.
- Opines that meeting energy demands can only be done once the general populous stops fearing nuclear prospects. the potential hazard of both nuclear waste and radiation from generating electricity with nuclear power is unwarranted.
- Explains that there have been three major nuclear disasters in the history of the technology: the chernobyl incident, the fukishima disaster, and the three mile incident.
- Explains that nuclear power plants cannot be used to create nuclear weapons due to varying processes of nuclear material enrichment.
- Explains that nuclear waste is unjustly seen as harmful because of a flawed understanding of radioactivity.
- Explains that nuclear waste is dangerous because of radiation, which is energy in wave form, or electromagnetic waves that travel through space.
- Explains that although nuclear reactors are not common worldwide, infrastructure exists to support them. nuclear power plants can power large areas for extended periods.
- Explains that nuclear energy is the only energy solution that is responsible for its own waste.
- Argues that the nuclear model is misguided because it does not take into account other radioactive metals and references relative rarity.
- Explains that nuclear energy, besides electricity production, is used in other constructive methods, such as medicine, desalination, and space missions.
- Concludes that nuclear energy is a reliable and powerful energy source that can spearhead energy reform in an effective, high energy density method.
2404 wordsRead More - Nuclear Energyanalytical essayMany people argue that the main problem with nuclear power plants is the radioactive waste it leaves behind which have no use. ‘A typical nuclear power plant in a year generates 20 metric tons of used nuclear fuel. The nuclear industry generates a total of about 2,300 metric tons of used fuel per year’ (‘Nuclear Waste: Amounts and On-Site Storage’). There are mainly two types of radioactive wastes, low-level waste and high level waste. Low level wastes are ordinary items that come in contact with some radiation and are generated anywhere radioisotopes are used or produced such as a hospital. High level waste is the actual spent fuel, or the residual waste from reprocessing spent fuel. It takes ten of thousands of year for this for this waste to decay and be harmless to the environment, so it needs professional han...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that energy consumption has become a necessity and an important part of our daily life in the past 10 years. since nuclear energy has emerged, it is the forerunner for alternative energy sources.
- Argues that the main problem with nuclear power plants is the radioactive waste it leaves behind which have no use. the advantages of using nuclear energy outweigh its disadvantages.
- Explains that the world is becoming a very dangerous place with number of countries owning nuclear weapons increasing.
- Explains that working in nuclear plants is a huge risk from many aspects. high radiation doses can destroy body functions and lead to death within 60 days.
- Explains that nuclear energy is a double-edged sword that needs to be used with utmost care. if it falls in the wrong hands, it may lead to wars and disasters.
1102 wordsRead More - Future of Nuclear Energy in Americaexplanatory essayNuclear Energy has many proponents and much opposition. Many of the groups that oppose nuclear power have legitimate concerns, mainly with the dangers of nuclear material in relation with human health concerns and environmental troubles that are risked by allowing nuclear power plants to increase in number. Yet, many of these opposition groups have made outspoken and radical claims about the “hidden” motives of why nuclear power is promoted and subsidized by our federal government. For example, The Nuclear Information and Resource Service claim that the federal government has the intention of committing genocide against Native Americans because uranium mining is predominantly done on reservations. Another cry out by nuclear power opponents is the constant reliving of the few nuclear mishaps that occurred decades ago, at Chernobyl or Three Mile Island. No doubt, past accidents have happened worldwide and are important reminders to not play around with nuclear material, but technology has improved as well, a fact opponents fail to consider. Many of these organizations feel that other sources should be used to supply America’s energy needs. These types of statements tag many opponents to nuclear energy as misinformed, out of touch with scientific facts, or just closed minded to the whole concept of nuclear power. On the other hand, the proponents of nuclear energy like President Bush see it as cheap, and environmentally friendly. As a result, President Bush passed the Comprehensive Energy Bill in 2005 that would increase production of all types of energy, including nuclear, by giving subsidies and tax breaks to nuclear power producers. Keeping safe America’s capabilities for generating electric power by way of nuclear e...
In this essay, the author
- Opines that nuclear energy has many proponents and many opposition groups, mainly with the dangers of nuclear material in relation to human health concerns.
- Explains the purpose of the paper, which is to show that policies are enacted for the issue of nuclear power in america and the negative and positive by-product that it creates.
- Explains that uranium is the main fuel for creating heat for nuclear power plants.
- Explains that america needs energy to sustain itself and there are many dynamics that affect the price of electricity.
- Explains that total production has increased every year for the past seven years and will continue to increase to meet consumer demand. they have forecast america's energy needs in table ii up to the year 2020 using the simple regression approach dunn mentions.
- Explains that half of our electricity is derived from coal. the downside to this is that coal will eventually be depleted and the external costs like global warming are higher than using nuclear fuel.
- Explains that energy costs are not included in consumer utility or gas bills, nor are they paid for by the companies that produce or sell the energy.
- Explains that uranium is the major fuel source for nuclear power plants, and the ocean's seawater has over 4 billion tons.
- Opines that if uranium prices increase substantially more firms would form and increase mine technology as well.
- Opines that the benefits of nuclear energy are real, while the risks are mostly hypothetical. the events at three mile island were serious, but redundant safety measures built into the reactor worked.
- Explains that despite the melted fuel, the integrity of the reactor vessel was maintained and the containment building confined radioactive material as designed.
- Explains that the small amount of radiation released into the atmosphere was equal to about one x-ray per person for those living within 10 miles of the plant.
- Explains that the maximum dose received by any individual was equal to what the average u.s. resident experiences as normal background radiation each year.
- Explains that since the three mie island incident in 1979, there have not been any new nuclear power plants licensed in america. future technology will make better safeguards for contamination possibilities.
- Explains that nuclear waste is dangerous, and states that the department of energy has developed and maintained an underground storage facility to ensure safe long-term storage.
- Explains that the department of energy's mission is to manage and dispose of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel in a manner that protects health, safety, and the environment.
- Explains that the department of energy has engineered for a plausible outcome, that is, an outcome likely if policy makers don't intervene to redirect the course of events.
- Explains that the nuclear information and resource service has eleven reasons why nuclear power should not be utilized.
- Explains that nuclear power is too expensive and risky to attract commercial investors. even with vast government subsidies, it is difficult to get proper financing and insurance.
- Analyzes how william dunn's analogy with the so-called "hydrogen economy" can be made with nuclear energy.
- Explains that america has the biggest and most diverse economy in the world, with low unemployment and a high standard of living. nuclear power plants do not increase the predicament of global warming.
4380 wordsRead More - The United States Government and Out Landanalytical essayThe United States government is known to give its citizens great advise with much care and concern. With this being known, many people come to the conclusion that United States citizens can faith in the government when it comes to making crucial decisions. Terry Tempest Williams is not one of these people. In “The Clan of the One-Breasted Women”, Williams gives her views on the government conducting nuclear tests in Utah. In contrast, in “America’s Energy Plan in Action: Bearing Witness,” an article Williams contributed to Orion magazine and OrionOnline, Williams speaks on issues containing actions of the government drilling for oil and natural gases. This is also conducted in Utah. Both of these articles share a common topic and tone. These two pieces both focus around major concerns for the Earth and how the government will is helping to destroy it for things like nuclear testing and drilling for oil and gases.
In this essay, the author
- Compares the views of terry tempest williams in "the clan of the one-breasted women" and "america's energy plan in action: bearing witness."
- Analyzes how williams, in "the clan of the one-breasted women," dreams about protesting against nuclear testing in utah. she claims that the government tested atomic bombs from 1951 to 1962.
- Opines that williams uses effective persuasion in her piece. she starts by telling the audience about how all the females in the family suffer from breast cancer.
- Analyzes how the irene allen v. the united states of america case infuriated williams. it started off fairly pleasing but ended in ruin.
- Analyzes how williams ends "the clan of one-breasted women" with the telling of her dream. she dreamt that women from everywhere came together to talk, sing, and dance, somewhat like prayer rituals.
- Analyzes how terry tempest williams' "the clan of one-breasted women" and "america's energy plan in action: bearing witness" are strong pieces against government action.
- Analyzes how williams is sarcastic and doesn't waste time. she states that access appears to be no problem for companies to come and drill wherever they want. this is an obvious blow towards congress.
- Analyzes how williams describes the process of drilling in "clan of the one-breasted women," using words that get to the audience's emotions.
- Analyzes how williams shows sarcasm again when she talks about her conversation with a manager from the bureau of land management.
- Analyzes how williams' two pieces have a similar topic and style. she uses an emotional tone to capture the audiences' attention and gives the facts.
1475 wordsRead More