Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature review on why organic farming is better than conventional farming
Difference between organic and conventional agriculture
Consequences of factory farms
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In life, it always seems like the best things have the worst consequences. Driving 120 mph down I-5 would be quite fun, yet doing so would likely result in a prison sentence. Similarly, I enjoy eating pizza, but this combination of cheese, sauce and pepperoni makes for a meal that, if eaten enough, could result in a visit to the doctor’s office. Lately it seems like everyone’s goal in life is to eat healthier. There are grocery stores devoted to being natural and organic and food companies are constantly coming up with healthier options for restaurants and at home. Many people are now pushing towards an entirely organic society, that is, attempting to abolish the popular factory farm system for a more home-grown approach, replacing machines with workers; chemicals with love. However, this theoretical move towards an entirely healthy society is too drastic for us at this day in age. There are already millions of people suffering from hunger all around the country, and worrying eating healthy should be the last thing on their minds. Though not exactly ideal, our food situation in this country is not as bad as it may seem. Also, as a capitalist society, we have many choices as to what we buy. This should not be limited in order to make the country potentially healthier. Both large-scale factory farms and smaller organic farms have a place in our society. It is this combination that provides the consumer with the option to buy more expensive organic foods if they have the means, or to buy potentially cheaper food products mass-produced in a factory.
Over the last century there have been numerous technological advances in the field of agriculture. Chemical herbicides and pesticides, development of hybrid plant seeds, specially engine...
... middle of paper ...
...althy people buy Ferraris and fine wines, while the less fortunate of us buy Hondas and Five Dollar Footlongs™. Both lifestyles are perfectly acceptable, and if you are happy, it does not matter what you buy. So why can’t our food be like our possessions? There is a place for both food made in a factory and food made on a field. If we all had one choice for everything, life would be boring. Health is not only determined by what you eat, but by the emotions you feel. If restrictions on farming were put in place, our physical health may increase, but our overall emotional health would decrease. The stress some people have just trying to get by in life is enough, but to have these people forced to overpay for organic food that may or may not be noticeably healthier is unneeded. It is choice that drives us. Take that away, and we are no more human than the food we eat.
Moreover, this system of mass farming leads to single crop farms, which are ecologically unsafe, and the unnatural treatment of animals (Kingsolver 14). These facts are presented to force the reader to consider their own actions when purchasing their own food because of the huge economic impact that their purchases can have. Kingsolver demonstrates this impact by stating that “every U.S. citizen ate just one meal a week (any meal) composed of locally and organically raised meats and produce, we
In recent years, it is not even necessary to turn on the news to hear about the bad reputation farming has been getting in recent years. With the media focusing on things like drugs in animals and Pink Slime, or Lean Finely Textured Beef, it is a wonder that people are eating “non-organic” foods. However, many pro-farming organizations have been trying to fight back against these slanders. Still, the battle is not without heavy competition, and a good portion of it comes from Chipotle, a fast food Mexican restaurant that claims to only use completely organic ingredients in their food. Chipotle is constantly introducing advertisements claiming to have the natural ingredients, while slandering the names of farmers everywhere.
Have you ever wondered if organic foods are actually better for you? What if organic foods are not actually healthy and are just an immense scam from food companies to take your money away from you? In the documentary, In Organic We Trust, the narrator Kip Pastor attempts to persuade the viewers that, although the food system may be flawed, organic foods are actually better to consume. Pastor’s use of pathos and logos in this documentary are extremely credible and well structured, but the ethos Pastor provided in this documentary are not as well structured as the pathos and logos. Pastor does an excellent job in structuring the film In Organic We Trust, in an attempt to send his message across to the viewers. In the documentary in order to prove that organic foods are better than regular industrialized foods, Pastor uses the three different types of arguments pathos, ethos and logos. The film starts off by Pastor introducing himself and stating why he believes organic food are better showing his pathos and ethos. Then, Pastor goes on to explain numerous misconceptions about farming and how foods are grown, therefore showing his logos. Throughout the whole film Pastor explains the truth about farming and not sugar coating anything in order to prove his message.
Michael Pollan and David Freedman are two reputable authors who have written about different types of food and why they are healthy or why they are damaging to our health. Michael Pollan wrote “Escape from the Western Diet” and David Freedman wrote “How Junk Food Can End Obesity”. Imagine Pollan’s idea of a perfect world. Everything is organic. McDonald’s is serving spinach smoothies and Walmart is supplying consumers with raw milk. The vast majority of food in this world consists of plants grown locally, because almost everyone is a farmer in order to keep up with supply and demand. How much does all this cost? What happened to all the food that is loved just because it tastes good?
In Wendell Berry’s “The Pleasures of Eating,” this farmer tells eaters how their separation from food production has turned them into “passive consumers” who know nothing about the food they eat, or their part in the agricultural process (3). They are blindsided by a food industry that does not help them understand. Berry argues that the average consumer buys available food without any questions. He states consumers that think they are distanced from agriculture because they can easily buy food, making them ignorant of cruel conditions it went through to get on the shelf. Humans have become controlled by the food industry, and regard eating as just something required for their survival. Berry wants this to change as people realize they should get an enjoyment from eating that can only come from becoming responsible for their food choices and learning more about what they eat. While describing the average consumer’s ignorance and the food industry’s deceit, he effectively uses appeals to emotion, logic, and values to persuade people to take charge, and change how they think about eating.
Steven Shapin is an expert when it comes to telling people the reality of the situation. In his, article “What Are You Buying When You Buy Organic?” Shapin exposes and explains the truth behind the word organic. He explains that our view on organic is not a reality. The small farms that we picture in our heads are really just big business in disguise and these big businesses are trying to do good by supposedly not using harmful pesticides. Which are supposed to not damage the environment but in reality they are probably not making any sort of difference. Some people care about the environment, while others are buying taste when it comes to organic food but using different pesticides are going to help the taste, only freshness tastes the best.
When we think of our national health we wonder why Americans end up obese, heart disease filled, and diabetic. Michael Pollan’s “ Escape from the Western Diet” suggest that everything we eat has been processed some food to the point where most of could not tell what went into what we ate. Pollan thinks that if America thought more about our “Western diets” of constantly modified foods and begin to shift away from it to a more home grown of mostly plant based diet it could create a more pleasing eating culture. He calls for us to “Eat food, Not too much, Mostly plants.” However, Mary Maxfield’s “Food as Thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating”, argues differently she has the point of view that people simply eat in the wrong amounts. She recommends for others to “Trust yourself. Trust your body. Meet your needs.” The skewed perception of eating will cause you all kinds of health issues, while not eating at all and going skinny will mean that you will remain healthy rather than be anorexic. Then, as Maxfield points out, “We hear go out and Cram your face with Twinkies!”(Maxfield 446) when all that was said was eating as much as you need.
By implementing new farming techniques provided with the new technological advances in machines we can see abundant harvest in even the poorest third world countries. For example, the Green Revolution has already showed admirable progress in the northern part of India ever since it took start in 1950. By 1997, northern India increased its grain production by 37 percent. This has proven that traditional farming methods are being rendered obsolete. And because by the year 2000, there will be half the land per person in developing countries as there was in 1970, we need to apply ultra-efficient methods to sustain the growing need. Not only does the Green Revolution enhances food output, it also preserves the environment.
“What are we going to eat?” is a big question that we ask ourselves three time a day. We are eating the same kinds of foods over and over again. Most of our foods come from the supermarket, but many of us do not know where the foods origins. Most people don't realize the nutrition facts behind the fact. They are just simply filling up the stomach. As Michael Pollan, the author of Omnivore’s Dilemma, states: “Industry food system is most important reasons that make people unhealthy and obesity. Yet, eating organic food are considering healthier than industry food.” I believed although industry foods have less nutrition, and bad effects on human, individual responsibilities serve as the most important factor of the obesity in United States.
Environmental advocate and cofounder of Eatingliberally.org, Kerry Trueman, in her response to Stephen Budiansky’s Math Lessons for Locavores, titled, The Myth of the Rabid Locavore, originally published in the Huffington Post, addresses the topic of different ways of purchasing food and its impact on the world. In her response, she argues that Budiansky portrayal of the Local Food Movement is very inaccurate and that individuals should be more environmentally conscious. Trueman supports her claim first by using strong diction towards different aspects of Budinsky essay, second by emphasizes the extent to which his reasoning falls flat, and lastly by explaining her own point with the use of proper timing. More specifically, she criticizes many
In today 's world, it 's become blatantly clear that agribusinesses have been unconvincing in the eyes of the consumer. Simply put, Agricultural businesses produce food that is unhealthy and cruel towards animals. we as consumers must select foods that are local/organic. Thus putting pressure on the government to take action! I’ve always been a great supporter in having a sustainable food system that promotes health and protects our environment. Going off the movie, Food Inc, many would agree It 's time to take action towards a healthy structure! There are countless ways to steer ourselves away from such hazard. We can start off simply by requesting/buying local, organic foods at the grocery stores. The latter is something I’ve been practicing/preaching
As you walk through the grocery store, your eyes get crowded with images of “organic” and “non-GMO” labeling. Many people are quick to think that organic means it is healthier and more Eco. friendly than conventional foods. Moms wonder “Should I spend the extra three dollars to ensure my child’s health and well-being?”. Unfortunately, some try to educate themselves by watching documentaries like Food Inc.. These movies demonize conventional farming with images of conveyor belt chickens, ammonia strained beef, or farmers wearing gas masks as they walk through fields. Although it is never said out right, Food Inc. gives the impression that conventional farming is the root of all our problems such as environmental, and health problems. The problem
Food production has many challenges to address: CO2 emissions, which are projected to increase by two-thirds in the next 20 years, as the global food production increases so does the number of people going hungry, with the number of urban hungry soaring. The environmental issues are not the only ones to face; politics and economic globalization take also the big part in the food world. These days agriculture and food politics has been going through many changes but mostly under the influence of its consumers; back in the days people wanted as little as safety, variety and low costs of food. Now consumers demanding way more – greater freshness, nutritional value, less synthetic chemicals, smaller carbon footprint and less harm to animals. And that’s the time when urban agriculture emerged quite rapidly delivering locally grown and healthy food. Within the political arena, there are a few still in charge of defending the conventional food industries and commercial farms to retain the upper level. Against the hopes of nutrition activists, farm animal welfare defenders, and organic food promoters, the food and agriculture sector is moving towards greater consolidation and better sustainability. Although in social and local terms, food-growing activists know their role is under attack. Caught two words in the middle, is it possible to satisfy both?
Organic food and organic farming become a pop issue in today’s society. People begin to concern which kind of food is better for their health and which farming method is better for the environment. Most mothers will select food carefully and buy foods with the organic label when they are shopping in the supermarket, because they think organic food is better for their family’s health. But what is the difference between the “organic farming” and “industrial farming”? In the definition, organic farming is a form of agriculture that “relies on techniques such as crop rotation, green manure, compost and biological pest control.” Compare with organic farming, industrial farming will use more chemicals. Is organic farming better than industrial farming? This controversial issue has aroused wide public concern and heated discussions. From my deeper research in this area, I get a new understanding of the relationship between organic farming and industrial farming. Organic farming and industrial farming both have benefits and drawbacks, the best way to produce food is combining the organic farming with the industrial farming.
“Organic” and “natural foods” are a part of a trend that is growing quickly, but how much do we consumers really know about the difference between natural food and non-organic foods? Food that is considered organic can be defined as being produced without the use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, or other artificial agents. Processed foods are defined as foods that are packaged in bags, boxes or cans. Authors like Pollan and Foer, in their essays “Escape from the Western Diet” and “Against Meat” respectively, argue that organic food and a vegetarian diet are better for humans and the environment. Contrastingly, others like Shapin, author of “What Are You Buying When You Buy Organic” believe that we are too fixated on whether or not to buy