Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argumentative essay on privacy
Argumentative essay on privacy
Argumentative essay on privacy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argumentative essay on privacy
Personal Privacy…The topic I have chosen for my Research Paper, is a subject of extensive views and implications. I have done my research on the Web and gathered Web Resources and Databases to provide me with an ample amount of data to process into information that will enlighten the reader on this subject. I believe, however, the term ‘Privacy’, indicates the right of individuals to be free to enjoy life in peace and serenity. According to, ‘The New American Webster Handy College Dictionary, Third Edition’, ‘personal’ means: ‘one’s own, private’, and ‘private’ means, ‘state of being alone or private’. I hope to compare the legal aspect to the moral/legal issues.
Key words: Privacy, Personal, rights, Government, Corporations, Constitution, Bill of Rights.
PERSONAL PRIVACY LEGAL OF MORAL
I will attempt to present three (3) Important Findings I have encountered in the research of my paper. My first being that there is no explicit right to privacy in the U.S. Constitution. “The U.S. Constitution contains no express right to privacy. ‘The Bill of Rights’, however, reflects the concerns of James Madison and the framers for protecting specific aspects of privacy…” (The Right of Privacy: Is it Protected by the Constitution? Pg.1). It is obvious to me that the original framers needed additional conditions for the U.S. Constitution.
My next finding flows from the question about the right to privacy being supported by moral or ethical issues. There are, however, just as many issues supporting this point as there are issues against it. (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), (2002),(2013), pg.1: “There are several skeptical and critical accounts of privacy. According to one well known argument there is no right to privacy and there is...
... middle of paper ...
...ture, Identity and Information privacy in the age of digital government. Online Information Review, 33(3), 405-421. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14684520910969871
Rubel, A. (2011). The Particularized Judgment account of privacy. Res Publica, 17(3), 275-290. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11158-011-9160-4
The New York Times – The Opinion Pages (Feb 6, 2011) http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02d/07/opinion/07mon3.html?_r=0 Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1st pub. Tue May14, 2002; Substantive revision Fri Aug 9, 2013 http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/privacy/ ConsumerReports.org (September 2009) http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/money/consumer-protection/big- brother-is-watching...
The Right of Privacy: Is it Protected by the Constitution? Exploring Constitutional Conflicts.
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/righttoprivacy.html
The word “privacy” has a different meaning in our society than it did in previous times. You can put on Privacy settings on Facebook, twitter, or any social media sights, however, nothing is truly personal and without others being able to view your information. You can get to know a person’s personal life simply by typing in their name in google. In the chronicle review, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide,'" published on May 15th 2011, Professor Daniel J. Solove argues that the issue of privacy affects more than just individuals hiding a wrong. The nothing-to-hide argument pervades discussions about privacy. Solove starts talking about this argument right away in the article and discusses how the nothing-to-hide
SALAMUCHA, AGNIESZKA. Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy, Spring2009, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p166-168, 3p
But not only is it difficult to prove that corporations are more efficient with their privacy than individuals are, this also circles back to the policy’s affect on individual autonomy. And I believe it is necessary for Posner to consider the implications of his argument for humanity: an ethics argument that does not propose the betterment of society is unlikely to lead to better laws. For although Posner could use his claim that “history does not teach that privacy is a precondition to creativity or individuality” to argue against privacy’s relation to autonomy, it is inevitable that his policy would impact society for good or bad (Posner 407). Posner needs to address the effect by presenting contemporary evidence to support the view that privacy is unimportant to human emotion and individuality since his historical argument is irrelevant. Early philosophers such as Aristotle recognized the important “distinction between the public sphere of political action and the private sphere associated with family and domestic life,” and so while privacy may not have looked the same in these past societies, it nevertheless did exist (DeCew). Since cultures and social conditions have changed dramatically since Aristotle’s time, it is difficult to make a relevant comparison between privacy then and
Many Americans feel the right to privacy is within the Constitution that the founding fathers wrote. This has not always been the case. Many scholars have claimed that the authors of Constitution protected the right to privacy within the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court initially acknowledged protection under the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause for personal privacy and freedom from government intrusions into marriage, reproduction, and child rearing in the 1920’s, during the Lochner era (Obrien 2011). They then went on to explore the idea further.
American Philosophical Quarterly 21, no. 3 (1984): 227-36.
Privacy (Pri-va-cy) n.1.the state or condition of being free from being observed or disturbed by other people. Americans fear that technological progress will destroy the concept of privy. The first known use of wiretap was in 1948. It’s no secret that the government watches individuals on a daily bases. According to the constitution, the Fourth Amendment serves to protect the people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. Unreasonable is the word that tips the balance On one side is the intrusion on individuals’ Fourth Amendment rights and the other side is legitimate government interests, such as public safety. What we consider reasonable by law, the government might not think so. The word ‘privacy’ seems to be non-existent today in the 21st century; the use and advances of technology have deprived us of our privacy and given the government the authority to wiretap and or intervene in our lives. Our natural rights we’ve strived for since the foundation of this nation are being slashed down left to right when we let the government do as they wish. The government should not be given the authority to intervene without a reasonable cause and or consent of the individual
Wittgenstein, Ludwig; G. E. M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte (eds. and trans.). Philosophical Investigations. 4th edition, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. Print.
When we mention the word ‘privacy’, we mean that there is something very personal about ourselves. Something that we think others are not supposed to know, or, we do not want them to. Nevertheless, why is it so? Why are people so reluctant to let others know about them entirely? This is because either they are afraid of people doing them harm or they are scared that people may treat them differently after their secrets are known. Without privacy, the democratic system that we know would not exist. Privacy is one of the fundamental values on which our country was established. Moreover, with the internet gaining such popularity, privacy has become a thing of the past. People have come to accept that strangers can view personal information about them on social networking sites such as Facebook, and companies and the government are constantly viewing a person’s activity online for a variety of reasons. From sending email, applying for a job, or even using the telephone, Americans right to privacy is in danger. Personal and professional information is being stored, link, transferred, shared, and even sold. Various websites, the government and its agencies, and hospitals are infringing our privacy without our permission or knowledge.
The word “privacy” did not grow up with us throughout history, as it was already a cultural concept by our founding fathers. This term was later solidified in the nineteenth century, when the term “privacy” became a legal lexicon as Louis Brandeis (1890), former Supreme Court justice, wrote in a law review article, that, “privacy was the right to be let alone.” As previously mentioned in the introduction, the Supreme Court is the final authority on all issues between Privacy and Security. We started with the concept of our fore fathers that privacy was an agreed upon concept that became written into our legal vernacular. It is being proven that government access to individual information can intimidate the privacy that is at the very center of the association between the government and the population. The moral in...
The paper will deal with two aspects of the privacy-vs-security issue. The first one is concerned with general civil liberties, where privacy is understood to mean freedom to make personal (private) choices in our own homes, control our daily lives and decide with whom we share information that is of our concern – information about our emotions, attitudes, behavior and future decisions and events. The second aspect deals with the privacy vs. security on the internet. Since we live in a technological era, internet has become an inseparable part of our l...
The fight for privacy rights are by no means a recent conflict. In fact, there was conflict even back in the days before the revolutionary war. One of the most well-known cases took place in England, ...
As said by Eric Hughes, "Privacy is the power to selectively reveal oneself to the world. " 2 As written by Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis in 1928, the right most valued by the American people was "the right to be left alone". " 3 Previously it took a lot of equipment to monitor a person's actions, but now with technology's development and advancement all it requires is a computer. And there are many mediums which can be monitored, such as telephones, email, voice mail, and computers.4 People's rights are protected by many laws, but in private businesses there are few laws protecting an individual's rights.
"Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy." Beauvoir, Simone de []. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Apr. 2014. .
Along with Privacy and security comes the issue of terrorism, Constitutional rights, and Prisoners of War (POW). The privacy vs security debate has two sides to it. Many think that it has influenced governmental interaction with citizens. Sometimes the law focuses on the wrong interests. Just as security cameras are made for thief’s, there come along violations within a person’s workspace or personal life. Privacy emerged early on including Jewish and Roman laws safeguarding against surveillance. Once populations began to grow citizens around the world started filing complaints about noise and unlawful search and seizures. Security and Privacy become an internationally growing issue that affected the world. Security is known as a sort of Independence from danger. Privacy is a freedom from the Undesirable. “He noticed that the needle on his gas gauge was getting low and decides to pull over. As he walks into the gas station he pays for the gas with his credit card, steals a pack of cigarettes and a newspaper without the clerk knowing. B Horton proceeds out the doors and recognizes a security camera as he walks to his car. Later he is contacted and tried for theft. Some believe the camera was an invasion of his privacy but others say that Horton took from society” Webster 21) In America this was and still is a serious issue. The founders saw it coming and implanted laws against home invasions based on national security or to protect others. The fourth amendment in the Bill of Rights is one plan of action that the founding fathers implemented into the United States Constitution to give people a sense of privacy from law enforcement. Also the Fifth Amendment placed a specific procedure on how police go about arresting an individual. ...
In September 25, 1789, the First Amendment protects people’s privacy of beliefs without government intrusion. The Fourth Amendment protects one’s person and possessions from unreasonable searches and seizures. On February 1, 1886 in Boyd v. U.S. Supreme Court recognized the protection of privacy interests under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. In the 1890s, the legal concept of pr...