A jurisdiction is defined as “the sphere of a court’s legal authority to hear and decide cases” (Bianco & Canon, 2015). This is important because people would want to bring a case to the court that would be most suitable to their case. For example, if you were filing a case for harassment in the workplace, you would go to the state or federal court. This is can be decided on which court would provide you with more protection. There are, however, two types of jurisdiction. The first one being appellate jurisdiction and the second being original jurisdiction. Appellate jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear appeals from lower courts and change or uphold the decision. Original jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to handle a case first. In the case of the United States Supreme Court, the authority to hear disputes between two states would be an example of original jurisdiction. It is important to note that it is not limited to just the Supreme Court. They may assign cases to the lower court, if they deem it to be necessary.
There are many examples of court cases but these four stand out the most. The first would be Marbury v Madison in 1803. The Constitutional principle involved was the separation of powers. The judiciary. The decision of this case was important because established the Supreme Court’s right of judicial review. It also strengthened t...
... middle of paper ...
...ever, for this to be possible, Congress would first need to be backed up by two-thirds of both houses in order to override the expected presidential veto (Bianco & Canon, 2015).
The president is limited when it comes to congressional powers. Congress has the power of impeachment, power of the purse and is also limited by legislation. Furthermore, Congress has the power to override a veto. Also, the president is limited by judicial review, public opinion, as well as attention from the media.
An executive power does not necessarily grant the president too much power. As mentioned above, an executive power is not a law. It is just a directive as to how the executive branch should execute the law. The president has very limited power and it is purposefully set up this way. A president’s right to veto could also be overturned if the Congress disagrees with his decision.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The court system is the place aura of unlawful acts or affirmed law violations are made. The real parts of the court 's methodology are the prosecutor, the barrier attorney, the judge and the jury. To begin with I will clarify all the more as to the prosecutor. The prosecutor has three principle undertakings: to research criminal acts, to choose whether or not to impel legitimate processes and to show up in court. The prosecutor examines law violations together with the police. He or she might have contact with the individual associated with the wrongdoing, the victimized person and witnesses, and have close contact with the police.... [tags: Law, Criminal law, Jury, Court]
1110 words (3.2 pages)
- R. v. Williams,  1 S.C.R. 1128 Criminal Law and Supreme Court; McLachlin J. Facts An aboriginal by the name of Victor Daniel Williams, was charged in the year 1993 with the robbery of a pizza parlour. He was elected a trial by judge and jury where he pleaded not guilty to the crime. His defence was one of mistaken identity. Nevertheless the jury convicted him of robbery . At his first trial, Williams applied to question potential jurors for racial bias under s.... [tags: Jury, Court, Supreme Court of the United States]
751 words (2.1 pages)
- ... This is the part where I found was very crowded and chaotic due to everyone was shouting their answers, and standing up everywhere. My classmates and I all stood in the room until the very last juror was left. This is the point in which everyone was lost and then asked a security officer to help us find the room where the jurors have gone to dispute there civil lawsuit. Civil lawsuits is when an individual known as a plaintiff initiates this lawsuit against the other individual known as the defendant.... [tags: Plaintiff, Court, Lawyer, Pleading]
860 words (2.5 pages)
- Plea bargaining is a tool used in the court system for the benefit and detriment of the accused for numerous reasons. Additionally, the Crown will use plea bargaining for their benefit as well. For the purposes of this paper I intend to focus on the benefits and risks for an accused person to accept a plea bargain. Plea bargaining is an agreement between the Crown and the defendant in a criminal case. The Crown gives the accused an opportunity to plead guilty to a lesser charge for a lighter sentence or; to the same charge with a lighter sentence than the maximum sentence the Crown would have sought in a trial setting.... [tags: Crime, Criminal law, Court, Law]
1079 words (3.1 pages)
- Fear of Victims Most of the time people wonder why the victim fear to testify in court of law, and people also imagine what might happen to victim that testify in the court, but to find out the answer, we must first look at the definition of a victim. A victim is a person who has been attacked, injured, robbed, or killed by someone else (Mariam Webster). The victim may be a witness and have to give evidence. More generally, research made it obvious that victims don’t want to testify in court because they fear what may happen to them or their loved ones before, during or after witnessing.... [tags: testify, victims, evidence, court]
754 words (2.2 pages)
- ... Some alternatives are payment plans or community service. “These courts have original and exclusive jurisdiction over violations of city ordinances and, within the city limits, have a concurrent jurisdiction with Justice of the Peace courts over class C misdemeanor criminal cases where the punishment of conviction is by small fine only” (About Texas Courts). The next court that is also involved with criminal cases, of which are considered class C misdemeanors, is the Justice of the Peace court.... [tags: Court, Appeal, Law, Appellate court]
704 words (2 pages)
- CRIME AND CRIMINAL PROCESS COURT REPORT Kathryn Murray Within the criminal justice system, there’s been longstanding emphasis on judicial dispassion, in which the judge adopts a detached, unemotional demeanor to support their positional authority. As such, the courts have adopted a widespread belief that this behavior is the best means of demonstrating impartiality. Although judicial dispassion remains the dominant form of judgecraft, many question the effectiveness of this disengaged form of delivering justice.... [tags: Judge, Court, Law, Court systems]
1151 words (3.3 pages)
- Ms. Bouvia immediately appealed the decision of the trial court, which was summarily heard by the California Appellate court. She then filed a peremptory writ of mandate seeking the removal of the nasogastric tube inserted against her will without consent by physicians. The peremptory writ of mandate is a formal written command from a court of superior jurisdiction to the lower court to change the order or the decision of the lower court. The Court of appeals of California ordered the trial court to enter new order to grant Bouvia’s request for the “(1) removal of the nasogastric tube from her body, (2) prohibiting any and all of the real parties in interest from replacing or aiding in repl... [tags: Appeal, Law, Trial court, Medicine]
1448 words (4.1 pages)
- In a governmental context, it can be argued that a court system that does not present a unified position when dealing with legislative and executive branch entities is not, in fact, an equal branch of government. The court system, as a whole, and the Supreme Court itself, in most cases where it is involved, want and need to speak in one voice, with a unified message. This, however, is not always the reality that we see. There are sometimes cases where the justices cannot agree on the outcome. Although the outcome favored by the majority always prevails, the dissenting sometimes choose to voice their disagreement in a public opinion in order to advocate for a different policy they themselves... [tags: Law, Appeal, Court, Court systems]
1238 words (3.5 pages)
- Contempt is generally defined as an act of disobedience to an order of a court, or an act of disrespect of a court. A client's failure to comply with a restraining order, a visitation order or an injunction in any kind of action may result in a finding of contempt of court, no matter the intention. The court has the power to punish neglection, violation of duty, or any other misconduct. Also a non-payment of a sum of money, ordered by the court to be paid can lead to contempt of court. Another type of contempt is whether the contempt charged is civil or criminal in nature.... [tags: essays research papers]
499 words (1.4 pages)