Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Topic of personality theory
Personality theories workbook case study 1
Psychology chapter 12 personality theory research and assessment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Topic of personality theory
Kurt Lewin, a German born man who left his home country during the Nazis time, came to the United States with the idea that Gestalt’s perspective could be applied to personality theory and social dynamics (Neill, J.). Lewin began with behavior, and then incorporated the idea of how people perceived the behaviors of themselves and others (Neil, J.). His differences were published in 1935 and was known as “Field Theory,” which would be something that set him apart from other theorist; in-fact he has done the complete opposite of the many before him (Book). This theory can relate to those that are from different physical and psychological environments.
Being a military wife, I have found it easy to relate to Kurt Lewin’s field theory. This theory states that a person’s behavior can be affected by their environment and personality (Book). This means that the behavior someone experiences throughout life could have been affected by how they were raised. Growing up I was from a small farm town in Oklahoma called Hugo: with an approximate population of
Although, we see how someone’s life experiences such as their psychology and physical environment can affect their personality, there has to be some kind of intertwining. I found that as I wrote this paper there were many things that came together and made it uneasy to tell which affected another greater. Was I affected by my life on the farm in a different way than those who grew up in the city? Did my parents beliefs in spanking make my life change compared to that of someone who received spankings? My answer is yes to both, but I believe these experiences could come with the same endings if paired with a similar child. Furthermore, I have to say that my life was shaped in a big way growing up on a farm close to family and there are not many people who can say their life was the
The effect of an individual 's personal experience may be one of the controlling factors of their life. In the short story “The Hand”, Yves Theriault presents the idea of the importance of an individual 's personal experience, and the effects of these experiences on their life. Yves shows how these personal experiences are important to one’s life, because it is in control of how an individual will change, and how it will develop their character and personality. This is shown by the character Géron, where one event in his life changed a personality trait that he had for most of his life. Many of my personal experiences could relate to Géron’s incident, where a small event had a large impact in my life, and how the story of our life is influenced
The personality of an individual and many other aspects of their life are integrated into their lifestyle as they grew up under the guidance of their parents. Some say that a person is born twice; once under the wings and guidance of their parents, and again when they themselves have children. In a lot of cases it is an arduous adventure, being a parent and in many ways, life changing. The difficulties that come to a parent or parents do not only arrive from the direct disturbances the offspring creates, but also knowing the fact that the way in which they act, punish, and teach will forever affect the life of that child. There are a variety of different outcomes from which the parent has had much effect on the child, some are simple as “like
Toman, Walter. Family Constellation: Its Effects on Personality and Social Behavior. Springer Publishing Co. 1992
The foundation of Adler’s human behavior theory rests in ten primary concepts with the first being holism. Holism, is essentially is the concept that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. An individual cannot view single view single manifestations of one’s psyche as independent of one another (Adlerian Grad School, 2007). A person can gain insight into them only if he or she views and integrates all manifestations as part of an indivisible whole. The second concept is social embedednes. According to Adler, all individuals are socially embedded. We decline to acknowledge an individual who remains isolated (Adlerian Grad School, 2007). We can understand one’s personality once we see him in his context. Third is teology, which is the mysterious creative power of life (Adlerian Grad School, 2007). It is expressed or expresses itself rather after a goal of mind and body cooperating together. Next is
The debate of nature vs. nurture continues today in the world of psychology. The effects of an individual’s genetics and the effects of their environment on their personality and actions is an age old debate that is still inconclusive. However, it is evident that both sides of the argument carry some form of the truth. It can be contended that the major characteristics of an individual are formed by their environment, more specifically, their past experiences. An individual’s past moulds and shapes their identity, if they do not make an effort to move on from it.
The enduring differences between individuals are an intriguing subject area in modern psychology. An interest in examining how people differ in their thinking, feeling and behaviour has developed over time. Even over 2000 years ago, Plato stated “No two persons are born exactly alike; but each differs from the other in natural endowments, one being suited for one occupation and the other for another”.
People’s “upbringing and even [people’s] culture … shape who [people] are” and their personality (Cherry). In the end, it comes back to the archaic argument of nature vs. nurture. Nowadays, most people agree that “a mixture of the two forces ultimately shape[s] [people’s] personalities” and decision making (Cherry). While genetics sets boundaries and comforts, the events that happen in adolescence add detail and shape to people’s personalities.
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2013). Theories of personality (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth.
Sigmund Freud’s theories allowed me to connect my personality with his beliefs. His theory suggests that human behavior is the result of the interactions between three parts of the brain: the id, superego, and ego (“Freudian Psychoanalytic
Hergehhahn, B. R. and Olson, M. H. (1999). An Introduction to Theories of Personality. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Feist, J., & Feist, G. (2009). Theories of Personality (7th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Throughout history, our society’s socialization, or lifelong social experiences, has been debated upon quite vigorously. It is quite evident that we all obtain certain characteristics and abilities through heredity factors, but many still argue that this is not the only explanation for how our lives are determined. The argument of nature versus nurture is still being discussed by many, although both have been seen to have an impact on our life experiences.
Personality Theories originate from the awareness that astute, intellectual theorists perceive when observing, examining and evaluating their own mental state of mind. Although theories are tested through research; human characteristics have exhibited that they can be demonstrated to contain errors. The most recent knowledge of understanding personality theories derives from a combination of components such as research on reoccurrences, culture, psychobiology, learning, traits, and social psychology. Alfred Adler titled his theory Individual Psychology with the belief that everyone is differently motivated. Fascinated with finding out what driving force motivates a person to reach their potential, and what keep them going during difficult times, Adler referred to his theory as “striving for superiority” (Friedman, H. and Schustack, (2012). Adler viewed motivation as future endeavors rather than the outcome of the past. He differed the basic concept of his personality typology from Classical Greek typology by referring to them as (1) Ruling-Dominant, (2) Getting- Leaning, (3) Avoiding and (4) Socially useful (Friedman, H. & Schustack, M., 2012).
We often wonder why we are who we are, why we think the way we think and act the way we act. Are our behaviors more influenced by the genes we were passed down, or the environment we were raised in? When attempting to discover where your behavior traits came from, you simply need to reflect on the various factors that caused you to develop into who you are today. If only people were more aware of how important something as simple as a touch from a mothers warm hands on their child could have such an impactful effect on their child’s psychological behavior in the future. Out of all the development stages I’ve went through in life so far my memory only allows me to recollect one specific stage more vividly than any other, the psychosocial development in middle childhood. I tend to recall this stage in my life more vividly because this was around the time my parents divorced and I would say that event definitely sparked a drastic change in my behavior. A major contributing factor in the psychosocial development in middle childhood is the environment you were raised in. The environment you developed in can be anything from the people in your life, the home you lived in, your mother and father’s parenting styles, and your parent’s employment and socioeconomic statuses. All these factors play a major influence on your development and potential behavior in the future. I found this to be quite interesting when looking back at how my family was structured and reviewing the type of family atmosphere my parents gave me growing up. In chapter 10 of our textbook Experience Human Development it states that “The most important influences of the family environment on children’s development come from the atmosphere in the home.” (p. 326, 2012) G...
...theories of nature and nurture as a precursor of personality may enable an individual to obtain a clear perspective of its evolution. However, in the study of personality, it is very important to understand the different theoretical approaches within its realm. It is important for the same reason that not one person is the same and neither are personalities; and for the very same reason why personality theorist’ differ when describing the concept and nature of humanity.