The Commerce Clause: Corruption And The Pursuit Of Abortion

1125 Words3 Pages

“We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable; that all men are created equal & independent, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent & inalienable, among which are the preservation of life, & liberty, & the pursuit of happiness; …” (1760-1776). Under this phrase Americans citizens have been sheltered from tyranny and a cruel world overall. State rights are more than well protected in current constitution and the political practices from the federal government. Of the many articles in the constitution, the Commerce Clause does more than regulate domestic and international trade. This clause is undeniably balancing the judicial powers and congress itself. An example of this would be the Supreme Court case, Gonzales vs. Raich. Among a small group of medical marijuana users, Raich …show more content…

Such as abortion, more and more girls are having children out of wedlock causing the unnecessary ability to kill the child before hand. Here, the controversy is among the people rather than the actual government. Jason Ladock explains, “By all accounts, abortion appears like an awful crime. After all, abortion implies denying someone a well-deserved life. Just because the odds are not in our favor, can we deprive someone the chance to live” (Ladock)? In this case, it is appropriate for abortion to be a debatable topic rather than an actual amendment. There are strong pros and cons to this ongoing struggle. A second non-government affair, would be capital punishment where most of the American people identify this as the death penalty. Mary Cooper reports, “When a murder takes place, the community is obliged, whether it feels like it or not, to clear its throat and step up to the microphone. Every murder demands a communal response. Among possible responses, the death penalty is uniquely powerful because it is permanent and can never be retracted or overturned. . .

Open Document